It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
No nation will surpass the US in terms of missile technology, let alone aircraft technology.
Originally posted by Stealth Spy
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
No nation will surpass the US in terms of missile technology, let alone aircraft technology.
take a chill pill dude
you mean ever in the future
Originally posted by waynos
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
Dream on.......
I think he was kidding, notice the smileys. No nation will surpass the US in terms of missile technology, let alone aircraft technology.
So how come the US industry has just launched a programme to develop a missile that will match or better the Meteor then? The reason why the US is coming out with new missiles such as the AIM-120D is to maintain air-to-air supremacy for years to come, much like they did with the other versions of AMRAAM.
Oh, thats right, you think the AIM 120C is superior to the Meteor don't you.
Your blind bias is amazing dude and I have finally been drawn into doing a little more than just reading your posts and grinning
I mean, the F/A-18E being better than Typhoon remark probably cracks me up the most when the RAF themselves have stated it comes nowhere near their requirement, which the Typhoon meets fully.
Incidentally the Typhoon pilot at Waddington who told he'd go up against anything qualified that comment by adding that 'we don't need to worry about the Raptor and ,OK it might be a bit close against the latest Flankers, but nothing else out there can touch us, *shake of head* No, nothing.
I reckon he would know.
Originally posted by waynos
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
As of right now, the F-22, the F/A-18E/F, the F-15C, and the Rafale are ahead of the Typhoon.
BTW. Try telling the guys of 17 and 29 Sqns that the F-15 is better than the Typhoon, they will point you to several frustrated F-15 pilots who will tell you different.
[edit on 18-7-2005 by waynos]
Originally posted by Badger
Ah come on hockeyguy, How can you slate the Typhoon for not having a "real" record and then spout off about the F22 being superior (which I believe it most certainly would prove to be in most areas) when it has no "real" record either? Similarly, how can you claim that the F35 will be the number 2 kid on the block in 10 years time when it hasn't even seen a production model off the line? A little consistency in your argument please!
I have a hard time believing that you would find many people in the USAF who would honestly support your argument that the F15C is superior to the Typhoon. Sure the F15 remains a very capable platform,and if fought correctly is not exactly a lamb to the slaughter, but in a BVR fight it is a comparative RCS barn door coming over the horizon when put up against the EF (which itself isn't exactly small when up against an F22). WVR? I know where my money is going. General Jumper of the USAF seemed quite impressed too.
The F18??????????????? Sorry too busy laughing to type much more on that particular statement.
And personally I haven't found a thing on Strategypage that supports your assertion that is in the least bit viable. Bloody hell, you're not Gixxerking by another name are you?
I hope you don't take this as anything personal as I enjoy, and am grateful, for your contributions to these boards. Just can't agree with you on this one.
The F-15C is getting old, sure enough if you try to attack that sucker, it just isn't going to roll over on its back and die, but the USAF itself have acknoledged that the F-15C isn't at the top of the bread line any more.
The F/A-18E/F Model aircraft just didn't meet RAF requirements, thats as simple as that, no matter how much you make minor changes to the F/A-18s airframe, it is still an aircraft with a large RCS, sure you can bolt on some stealth and chance some parts of the airframe but the design itself was designed for different requirements and for a different time.
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
The F-15C is getting old, sure enough if you try to attack that sucker, it just isn't going to roll over on its back and die, but the USAF itself have acknoledged that the F-15C isn't at the top of the bread line any more.
The USAF never admitted it because it's not true. US congressmen however said that.
The F/A-18E/F Model aircraft just didn't meet RAF requirements, thats as simple as that, no matter how much you make minor changes to the F/A-18s airframe, it is still an aircraft with a large RCS, sure you can bolt on some stealth and chance some parts of the airframe but the design itself was designed for different requirements and for a different time.
You're gravely mistaken, as of right now, the Super Hornet has a smaller RCS than both the Typhoon and the Rafale, there are even further plans to make it an even smaller RCS.
www.janes.com...
As for the Super Hornet, that link you provided merely says that it has a small RCS, in no way does it say that it is smaller than the Eurofighter or Rafale. Could you provide a better link if you wish to continue to make that assumption.
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
As for the Super Hornet, that link you provided merely says that it has a small RCS, in no way does it say that it is smaller than the Eurofighter or Rafale. Could you provide a better link if you wish to continue to make that assumption.
It was in either a Jane's magazine or an AvWeekly mag, but anybody with a brain and does the right research knows that the Super Hornet has a smaller RCS than the Typhoon.
asposted by gooseuk
Again, I read a number of Military magazines, including Janes and I have yet to see mention of the respective RCS aspects of the Eurofighter/Rafale and the F/A-18E/F.
Aircraft --- RCS[dBsm] --- RCS[m2] --- RCS[ft2]
F-15 Eagle --- +26 --- 400 --- 4,305
F-4 Phantom II --- +20 --- 100 --- 1,076
B-52 Stratofortress --- +20 --- 100 --- 1,076
Su-27 --- +12 --- 15 --- 161
B-1A --- +10 --- 10 --- 108
F-16 Fighting Falcon --- +7 --- 5 --- 54
B-1B Lancer --- 0 --- 1 --- 11
F-18E/F Super Hornet --- 0 --- 1 --- 11
Rafale --- 0 --- 1 --- 11
Typhoon --- -3 --- 0.5 --- 5.5
AGM-86 ALCM --- -6 --- 0.25 --- 2.5
BGM-109 Tomahawk --- -13 --- 0.05 --- 0.5
SR-71 Blackbird --- -18 --- 0.015 --- 0.15
F-22 Raptor --- -22 --- 0.0065 --- 0.07
F-117 Nighthawk --- -25 --- 0.003 --- 0.03
B-2 Spirit --- -28 --- 0.0015 --- 0.02
AGM-129 ACM --- -30 --- 0.001 --- 0.01
Boeing Bird of Prey --- -70 --- 0.0000001 --- 0.000008
Originally posted by WestPoint23
What was that EF pilot talking about saying he doesn't even have to worry about the Raptor if he went up against he I’m pretty sure he would loose. Unless he means we don't have to worry about it being used against us.