posted on Aug, 20 2003 @ 09:07 PM
I think the replies to this thread are a perfect example of what is the biggest problem now and what will continue to be so in the years to come:
disinformation for the sake of political gain. How many people have listed overpopulation as a huge problem? too bad birth rates are not adequate to
maintain the population in the long run in most countries, and only the third world countries have true long term risk of overpopulation. Yet you hear
this constantly in all the various forms of propaganda. Close behind this example is the "global warming" farce. Sure, the climate is
changing.....thats normal. However, mankind has nothing to do with that, in the slightest. One volcano destroys more ozone and creates more greenhouse
gases than we have in the last 50 years, at the least. But boy it sure is a good political tool. Society is rampant with this complete idiocy, and I
fear it will only spread as less and less people truly educate themselves in an objective manner. I mean, the people on this site are those who seek
information, yet over half as still misinformed.....so where does that leave the majority group, the mindless sheople of the world? Its a scary
thought.
that being said, beyond the misinformation bit....this risk is tied to the first, but that of a destabilization of global relations, most likely
through a fundamentalist movement or power grab in a key country, ie US, UK, China, etc. The highest risk of this seems to me to be in the US, at the
time being.
If those things dont get us, I think the problem of extra-terrestrial life will be the next best bet for causing things to go to hell. For one, once
the truth comes out, as I think it must, in time, whatever lies behind the "alien" phenomenon is going to cause a great deal of unrest, fear, and
anger on a global scale. Whether you think it is an extra-terrestial source, or of a terrestrial source, the truth coming out about either is sure to
cause great unrest, and if the truth should be the existence of aliens, then be prepared for some massive shifts in the world, as well as a very high
risk of many countries turning to a police state to maintain control. I dont see a pretty picture for the next hundred years, however you slice it.
Fourth, lets see....well, I think fourth is going to be largely immaterial beside the first three, because #1 has set the stage and will continue to
set the stage until #2 or #3 brings chaos. But, should both of those storms be weathered, or slow in coming, I think #4 will be the attempts of
mankind to control every aspect of nature. Be it genetic manipuation, weather control, or something else entirely, mankind will bring down a great
crisis on itself, if the unrest and chaos of #2 or #3 dont cut it short. The danger is grave, and the potential cost to innocent lives far eclipses
any war.
Fifth, I would rank the risk of a third world war. While I think the odds are signifigant, I think the risks of paradigm changes in the global society
are not as severe. Any effects of a world war would be localized, and would be over shortly after the war is over. Even the risk of the misuse of
nuclear weapons or chemical weapons is not as bad as some alternatives. Terrible, and hopefully they will never occur, but still, I think this world
has seem more gruesome wars than we will ever truly realize, and yet we have, and will continue to, survive the horrors of warfare.
But thats just what I think....