 |
|
Topic started on 18-8-2003 @ 06:46 AM by Nans DESMICHELS
|
British Broacasting Corporation (Or company) : A communist network ?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 06:49 AM by infinite
|
hmmmm.....i really don't know if they are. I haven't seen anything to say that they're a communist network.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 06:56 AM by Vindicator
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 10:41 AM by CiderGood_HeadacheBad
|
Whatever makes you think that?!
The BBC has always stayed well within the boundaries of good taste and is quite conservative in this way. The news coverage is neutral and
un-editorial.
If anything, the BBC comes across as centrist, as far as politics are concerned.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 10:50 AM by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
|
Other than being publically funded by hideous TV taxes, it seems pretty neutral to me. No hammers, sickles, or calls to kill the rich and redistribute
the wealth.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 10:59 AM by Springer
|
The network that brought us the genius of Monty Python's Flying Circus a commie institution?! NEVER!
P...
m...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 11:47 AM by infinite
|
I will only believe this about the BBC when i see the teletubies turn to communist and when tinky winky becomes the new stalin
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 03:17 PM by Freddie
|
No, silly the BBC is the Baghdad Brodcasting Corporation.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 03:23 PM by Zzub
|
In what way is it a commie network? Please explain.
*fumes*
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 03:26 PM by Freddie
|
The BBC is exactly like NPR and PBS in America. Left-wing mouths supported by the respective governments.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-8-2003 @ 02:07 PM by Zzub
|
Come on then, explain why the BBC is a commie broadcast?
Or are you going to veto this post?
[Edited on 19-8-2003 by Zzub]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-8-2003 @ 10:35 AM by Estragon
|
Nans, you've overdone the Pernod. The BBC is the March of God through history: the finest organisation in the world and England's gift to benighted
non-cricket-players.
It's new, it's old-fashioned, it's improved, it's traditional.
Scarcely a bed-fellow of governments: hence the Blair-Kelly unpleasantness or for that matter the Falklands-Thatcher unpleasantness 20 years ago.
It is a bureaucracy "run" by Oxbridge hacks and government toads but the journalists are the best. It is -emphatically -the only international
"medium" that is pretty much trusted outside the white man's world.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-8-2003 @ 10:40 AM by Estragon
|
Not that Estragon has anything against "Oxbridge hacks and government toads " of course, he is one of the former and if the price were right he'd
fancy being one of the latter.
Seriously, Nans: warts and all, the Beeb (World Service Radio, I stress, not the UK TV or the dubious world TV service) is the best: and I could
bore posters with many a tale of Estragon's journey's among the heathen peasantry where the only source of any information that was trusted was the
World Service.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-8-2003 @ 10:50 AM by Estragon
|
And how did this thread get into a forum designed explicitly to cater for the descendants (some of them, at least) those who abandoned the virtues of
rule from Westminster, pronouncing "herb" correctly, complete ignorance of baseball, driving on the right side of the road, coining words such as
"copacetic",and of correct spelling!!??
Something about PBS, perhaps?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |