It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Website that carried al-Qaida claim has connections to Bush family

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 04:15 PM
link   
The website which claimed responsibilities for the attacks in London is run in Houston, Texas.

prisonplanet.com...

It was posted on an Arabic website, al-qal3ah.com, which is registered by Qalaah Qalaah in Abu Dhabi and hosted by a server in Houston, Texas.
But two Israeli groups devoted to exposing the network of jihadist sites claim that it is connected to the London-based Saudi dissident Saad al-Faqih. Mr Faqih, who is based in Willesden, north-west London, and runs the Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia (Mira), was designated by the US treasury last December as a supporter of al-Qaida. The UK Treasury followed suit by freezing Mr Faqih's assets.

The server in Houston has intriguing connections. Everyone's Internet was founded by brothers Robert and Roy Marsh in 1998 and by 2002 had an income of more than $30m (now about £17m).

Renowned for his charitable work, Roy Marsh counts among his friends President George Bush's former sister-in-law, Sharon Bush, and the president's navy secretary.

I wonder what this means. The Bush family involved in yet another conspiracy??

[edit on 7-9-2005 by CPYKOmega]




posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 09:14 PM
link   


Renowned for his charitable work, Roy Marsh counts among his friends President George Bush's former sister-in-law, Sharon Bush, and the president's navy secretary.

I wonder what this means. The Bush family involved in yet another conspiracy??


Is this the Bush connection you are referring to? I'm far from a Bush supporter, but even I would say that's a pretty far streach to link it to bush.



posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 09:16 PM
link   
I do not like dubya...didn't vote for the rat....but it means nothing and this is just sadly silly!



posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 09:25 PM
link   
Surprise, surprise, prisonplanet distorts the truth again.

This time they reprint the article, but change the headline to fit their agenda.


Prisonplanet article headline:
Website that carried al-Qaida claim has connections to Bush family

prisonplanet.com...


Source article headline:
UK-based dissident denies link to website that carried al-Qaida claim

www.guardian.co.uk...


A rich guy in texas who knows Bush's former sister-in-law is hardly a connection to the Bush family.

Roy Marsh also said this:


We support the uncensored flow of information and ideas over the internet and do not actively monitor subscriber activity under normal circumstances.


He owns the servers not the content.

Yet more proof that prisonplanet.com is a bad source.



posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 09:26 PM
link   
Before we start crying conspiracy...
__________________________
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Six degrees of separation is the theory that anyone on the planet can be connected to any other person on the planet through a chain of acquaintances that has no more than five intermediaries. The theory was first proposed in 1929 by the Hungarian writer Frigyes Karinthy in a short story called "Chains".
Wikky
___________________________




posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 09:28 PM
link   
Even if Bush owned this himself, it doesn't mean anything. It's an ISP which is no more responsible for what's posted on its servers than your ISP is for what you do online... :shk:



posted on Jul, 10 2005 @ 02:12 AM
link   
A Desperate Attempt To Prove What?

So let me get this straight.

A friend of Bush's former sister-in-law runs an ISP that, along with about $30 million in other business which includes hosting a bunch of porno websites, also hosts a website that two Israeli groups claim is connected to a guy that may be connected to Al Qaeda?

And this somehow establishes “The Bush family involved in yet another conspiracy??”

Even if everything in the article is true, what does it mean? Not a damn thing.

For a conspiracy to exist, it has to make sense.

This doesn't.

I try to keep an open mind, but this is just sad.



posted on Jul, 10 2005 @ 03:47 AM
link   
This reminds me of a forward I got once ages ago talking about how you could take any actor in Hollywood and somehow connect him/her to Kevin Bacon. I forget what it was based on, but was rather amusing.

Needless to say, this is about as much of a stretch as that was.



posted on Jul, 10 2005 @ 04:29 AM
link   
Well seeing as there are nothing but ridicules revolved around this thread I will just be quiet on this issue.





posted on Jul, 10 2005 @ 04:25 PM
link   
Don't take it personally; nobody was trying to flame you. It was the idea that we have a problem with.


Btw, you mentioned that

It was posted on an Arabic website, al-qal3ah.com,

and that site is in arabic. Can you read arabic, or do you have another link that has an English translation?



posted on Jul, 10 2005 @ 04:40 PM
link   
The Target Of My Ire


Originally posted by CPYKOmega
Well seeing as there are nothing but ridicules revolved around this thread I will just be quiet on this issue.

Hey I'm not knocking you at all. Despite the fact that I think the article is utterly ludicrous, this is the sort of thing we talk about on ATS, and I see nothing wrong with posting it here.

Having hopefully made that clear, I really don't think you should take it personally when ATSers expose the utter silliness of articles like these.

The problem with this story is that even if it's 100% true, it's 100% pointless.

Please don't take that the wrong way.



posted on Jul, 10 2005 @ 04:58 PM
link   
Yes, after re-reading the article it doesn't really matter. As pointed out earlier it doesn't matter where the ISP is it is up to the individual to produce the content of the website. I'm only human.


Rit

posted on Jul, 10 2005 @ 08:06 PM
link   
This Al Quada threat was posted here on ATS months before the London attacks .

And I am pretty sure it was a part of a British research paper that someone did. Someone here invented "The Secret Organization of Al Quada in Europe" as saying "That was what they would probably call thesmelves if there was an attack on EUrope".

And the London attacks were to me, a staged attack by the MI-6. A hollywood show.

[edit on 10-7-2005 by Rit]



posted on Jul, 10 2005 @ 11:00 PM
link   
I don't think anything that was said was directed at you at all CPYK.

But rather at a site that has an amazingly lengthy history of distorting facts in order to further a very specific political agenda.

EV1 hosts over 300,000 domains according to their own "About Us" section.

I don't see how in the world a self respecting author could pen an article like that claiming that it's obvious that Bush is involved because one of the 300,000 hosted domains is a terrorist and one of the owners of EV1 is pals with someone who used to be related to Bush.

Surely you can see that the author of the article was desperately grasping here.

But really, don't take it personally, none of that was directed at you, you didn't write the article.

The article is certainly fair discussion on ATS, which is what you did, but you have to expect that something written like that is going to get negative attention.


Rit

posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 12:15 AM
link   
If you backtrack Bin Laden to 1300BC you will find out that Bin Laden and Bush are brothers.




No but anyone can put up a webpage on a US service provider. Doesnt mean any affiliation. Maybe they did it on purpose.



[edit on 11-7-2005 by Rit]



posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 02:46 AM
link   
Rit you crack me up with your utterly useless attempt at humour. Yes I was being quasi facetious. No need to apologize Sir.





posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 05:21 AM
link   
hey im sure the info is 100% legit; as far as i know alex doesnt make up articles

but...he is taking things outta context here a little bit
its circumstancial evidence

its a very loose connection the say the least

dont get me wrong; im pretty convinced that the govt is up to no good; and i think the possibility they created this whole thing is very reasonable

but i also think we need to stick to direct inconsistancys
circumstancial evidence is just that, circumstancial

i would tend to agree with most posters here that this particular information is outta context

i dont think alex intentionally twists things
i do think in this case he did jump to conclusions due to loose connection thru circumstance
it wouldnt hold up in court u know?

regaurdless; alex is still a good guy in my book and i like him alot


but that dont mean i believe everything he says without questioning it haha
i question everyone including myself
am i questioning myself?
yup just did



posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 04:17 PM
link   
Read this if YOU REALY care about the U.S.A. rense.com...



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join