Drugs?, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 07:44 PM by Fry2
Kind of ironic that The Salton Sea just started on Cinemax...



reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 08:26 PM by Toltec
You know here in the US there is a program called Scared Strait, in which adolescents which have acted up to an extent they seem headed to jail one day, are exposed to people in the prison system. Hard core criminals in a controlled setting are given the opportunity to show these youths what prison life is really like.

Is there such a program which exposes potential adolescent drug abusers to the consequences evident in medical stabilization units of long term user's of drugs? No and for as to why, is that such a program would be considered abusive (something I agree with).

Legalizing drugs would turn our roadways into killing fields, make access to adolescents and preadolescents as easy cigarettes are today.

A recent study on cocaine (for instance) involved placing a mouse in a cage with food, water and a liquid solution mixed with cocaine, the animal starved to death. The study was repeated over and over again with the same result.

Addiction is a fascinating phenomenon essentially, the brain is filled with many different chemicals and when drugs are used, the levels and balance the brain maintains in respect to these chemicals is altered.

The brain then in essence accepts these levels as valid, as the body is taking in substances which are making the difference. As a result the brain is fooled into believing these levels are correct and responds both psychologically and physiologically, when the body stops taking the drug what maintains the new
levels.

The more you take the more you need.

Underlying all of this is the fact that the levels which are supposed to be maintained for health, survival and proper functioning. Were the levels which existed prior to using the drug.

The analogy commonly applied with respect to "this is your brain (an egg) and this is your brain on drugs (and egg in a frying pan cooking) is more than just correct, it describes exactly what is happening.

Released this week was a study that presents clearly the up until the age of 20 the human brain is still engaged in developmental orientation. In other words an adolescent is not yet a fully developed human.

See link....
abcnews.go.com...

Any thoughts?

[Edited on 19-8-2003 by Toltec]


reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 09:04 PM by Fry2
Hi Toltec. Read many of your posts but have not engaged you yet. Nice to meet you

OK to answer some of your queries:

Is there such a program which exposes potential adolescent drug abusers to the consequences evident in medical stabilization units of long term user's of drugs? No and for as to why, is that such a program would be considered abusive (something I agree with).


Yes, there are. If you search around this site you will find the one in Jamaica. On the other hand there are the other ones that are more of a "survivor" type situation in ConUS. My father did a documentary on one back in the 70's. It worked well then and they still work now.
How do I know?
My wife is an Admin./Teacher at an "alternative" High School. Meaning: the kids that are too bad for the mainstream school.
She had a 17 year old that was doing everything under the sun until the father stepped in and shipped her to Colorado .

She came back after 2 months and was 100% clean and a good person overall. She has since graduated and is picking a university.

Point is, they do exist. ---stretching fingers----

Legalizing drugs would turn our roadways into killing fields, make access to adolescents and preadolescents as easy cigarettes are today.

I guess I need to ask...What drugs are you referring to?.
Killing fields? They already are and it has NOTHING to do with drugs. People are inherently stupid.
Marijuana should be under the same restricions as alcohol. Therefore, a bit tougher to get than cigarettes.
A recent study on cocaine (for instance) involved placing a mouse in a cage with food, water and a liquid solution mixed with cocaine, the animal starved to death. The study was repeated over and over again with the same result.


Give a rat cocaine and it just wants more, give a person cocaine and usually the same thing happens.
hmmm, I just had an idea about going to a coke party and setting up a maze with cameras. What fun!



reply posted on 20-8-2003 @ 04:35 PM by bigblakbus
in the event that drugs should become legal, as skadi put it, the monolith companies that own the rights to everything else would also own the rights to manufacturing, marketing and distributing their drugs. instead of being thrown in jail for pushing and killing, street dealers would be thrown in jail for copyright infringement, possibly. you wouldn't have crime lords kidnapping children and holding them hostage because some crack addict can't pay their dealer, that job would be taken over by credit companies and bill collectors. that's the whole point of legalizing them, take the power away from these huge drug rings. and there would be little safety warnings and dosage recommendations on the packages and everything would be carefully gauged ad regulated and consistent in the manufacturing process, therefore making them at least a little safer, so when your curious children decide to experiment, there will be a lesser chance of someone dying from an overdose the first time. as far as weed goes, that shouldn't even be a part of this discussion. and yeah, THERE'S ALREADY CRACKHEADS AND JUNKIES ON EVERY STREET CORNER, unless you live in idaho or something, or whatever, at least where i live there are. i am in california, maybe that has something to do with it. a lot of the time crackheads and junkies are on some form of welfare (not all of them, but a lot) and the public is paying them money they are supposed to use to get food and pay rent and try to get themselves back up on their feet, but instead they take the money and buy tweek or smack with it, and so the public is basically already paying out of their own pockets these huge drug leaders and crime lords that kill infants to stuff with the sh!t to get it across the borders.
simpler : YOUR TAX MONEY IS GOING TO ADDICTS WHO BUY DRUGS FROM MURDEROUS CRIMINALS, would you rather have the money go to at least our own "legal" corporate criminals, you know keep the money on our own team at least? the quality would be far better i'm sure...



reply posted on 20-8-2003 @ 09:53 PM by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
I will repeat mysefl again:

Drugs do not make your destiny, people do.

Drugs do not take your ambition, you do. Drugs did not make you take them, you CHOSE to take them. No one FORCES drugs on you. If you get into deeper and deeper, it is because you made the choice to do so.

When people quit blaming drugs and god and bad parents, and start taking responsibility for thier own actions, then maybe, human society MIGHT evolve.

Until then, I can only laugh when people think that drugs make everyone do stuff that thats the source of all thier problems. What made then take that first hit/slam/snort?

Venus, I smoke. Ciggarettes are VERY addicting. I smoke almost two packs a day. You assume too much when you dont think I understand addiction, I grew up around addicts. I am addicted, and spend money that I could spend for other things feeding my addiction. Going without smokes makes me moody, irritable, manic, and semi violent. Yet do I want smokes outlawed? No. I knew ciggatrettes were addictive when I started. My grandma died from lung cancer. My mom rots away from it. Yet I still smoke. I CHOSE to. making cigies illegal would turn me semi criminal. I enjoy smoking despite the certain slow rotting death it shall cause me. Making them illegal would not stop me. Just like making drugs illegal doesnt stop people from doing them, and only turns people criminal. The US has the tougest drug laws, yet our rate of use is sky high. Drug laws and making them illegal did not stop, and only makes people do more and more. The war on drugs, just like the war on terror, is a fraud, a joke, and unwinable. They only serve as excuses to rob people of rights and bury the constitution.

So, yes, drugs should be legal, and crime would rop quite a bit if they were legal. Again, I will say it once more: what one person wants to do to thier body is thier business, not the govs. Juts like I oppose the govornment trying to force me to stop killing my lungs, I oppose people who prevent others from following thier own vices.

And i can only laugh at your comment about reinstituting prohibition. Read the history of the 20's to see what a miserable failure making booze illegal was. Crime soared in the 20's because of illegal booze.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why my mind is closing towards Capitalism
  Posted 11 days ago with 78 member flags
Hippy Do-Gooders have Destroyed the World
  Posted 12 days ago with 23 member flags
Facts About Socialism
  Posted 3 days ago with 23 member flags
Are Liberals REALLY More Intelligent Than Conservatives?
  Posted 8 days ago with 18 member flags
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Posted 1 days ago with 16 member flags
The "Occupy are Socialists," Megathread
  Posted 12 days ago with 8 member flags
Unpopular Opinions: Say NO to Human Rights
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
This is what needs to happen: REVOLUTION!
  Posted 14 days ago with 5 member flags