It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Moon Landing!

page: 1

log in


posted on Jul, 8 2005 @ 11:47 PM
sorry if this is the wrong forum guys but couldnt think of anywhere else to put it, but aren't we forgetting one of the most important conspiracys of all time! the landings were fake and filmed in area 51 film studio. any ideas or new theorys about this massive lie welcome

posted on Jul, 8 2005 @ 11:56 PM
This should be moved to chit chat. mods, anyone.

I'll ask you, the same way I've asked all the other nuts that think we didn't land on the moon. Do you believe in the airplanes that are up in the sky, or is that just magic too.

posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 12:01 AM
This has been disccussed to Death Here on ATS. Do a Search for past threads. You'll find tons of information.

posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 12:06 AM
I agree. I have seen shuttles take off with my own eyes when I lived in Florida, and my grandparents lived only 40 miles from the cape in the 60s. It was all about the cold war space race. We may not have been the the first ones in space, but we upped the stakes at Kennedy's command, and landed on the moon. I saw something on the history channel about this today around 3:00, and it all looked pretty freakin realistic to me. You have to remember, we didn't have the complicated special effects for film that exist today. Why lie, the landing zones have been photographed, and evidence has been documented. They didn't have photoshop or computer effects to add to film in those times. It was as real as the lightning in the sky, or do some people still think that is a product of mythical gods? If you want to debunk something, try debunking the "psychics" who don't buy lottery tickets. (that would only make sense, right?)

posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 12:11 AM
CSM, I'm not trying to be rude, so please don't take it that way. But, please, I don't know about anyone else, but I am so sick and tired about hearing about, "yes, the moon landings were real", "no, they were a hoax". They were filmed at Universal Studios or somewhere in Hollywood, now, at Area 51. But why is it that the satellite pictures returns photos of the moon's surface with an American Flag on it.

You see, our government is probably capable of pulling off just about anything. Also, if you have ever gone to the movies, you have probably noticed that although the movie may be interesting, there are things that happen in most of them that just are not physically possible. Yet, in the movies, anything that they want appears to be perfectly real.

Unless you were a high up key person in NASA at the time, or are Niel Armstrong, you don't know one way or the other, neither do I, no one will probably ever know for sure. So, why can't the subject just be dropped. Sure, let's chuckle over it every now and again, wonder occasionally about it. But, why go to such great lengths (I don't just mean you), to either prove or disprove it. As far as I know, real or not, no one was killed, there was not a senseless war over it with immense loss of life and limb.

You didn't go, I didn't go, no one at ATS went (most likely). So, either we watched a really good movie, or we watched a real life event. I realize that this is a conspiracy site, and I wouldn't be here if I didn't like to discuss conspiracies. But this one has been dragged through the mud over and over, with no proof on either side. And this particular subject was not deadly, it was harmless, really. And it's driving me crazy hearing about it over and over again.

Let it go..........Maybe one day there will be a passenger shuttle to the moon in our lifetime. Probably not.

It is more likely that NASA or some excited scientist will shoot some missile at it and blow it to smithereens before we ever find out the truth. So......
let's just leave the moon be for as long as it will be. It is comforting to look at, it gently moves the tides, and with the advancing technology of man, it's longevity is not too predictable. O.K?

posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 12:19 AM

Originally posted by venom79x
...and it all looked pretty freakin realistic to me. You have to remember, we didn't have the complicated special effects for film that exist today. They didn't have photoshop or computer effects to add to film in those times.

I'd suggest you look at the production date of this little diddy by Stanley Kubrick...

EDIT: Mod edit of OVERSIZED image, made into a direct link.

[edit on 9-7-2005 by Seekerof]


posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 12:32 AM
First, as has been pointed out. This has been discussed and debunked to death. Check out the "Space Exploration" section for further topics on this subject.

Originally posted by twitchy
I'd suggest you look at the production date of this little diddy by Stanley Kubrick...

2001? I own it on DVD, good movie. But it sure doesn't look real though. Good for it's time, but doesn't hold up today, yet the NASA Moon footage and photos do, in my opinion.

posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 11:13 AM
Debunked beyond debunking.
Topic and Discussion Index for HAARP and the MOON LANDING

Over 20 past ATS topics on or related to the Moon landing.


posted on Jul, 10 2005 @ 07:30 PM
I know we're trying to end this discussion so I'll make it quick. I just want to point out a couple of things about the landings:

1. With all of the spying technology the Soviets had, they could have heard and known what was going on and if they had had any doubt about the authenticity of the moon landingn they would have come out trying to disprove it. Rather, they remained quiet and their space program slowly died (as far as landing on the moon).

2. At the time of the landing, NASA employed over 4,000 people. Over the course of almost 40 years, if the landing was infact falsified, at least one of the people would have come forward I'm sure. It would be a lot easier to fly a craft to the moon and back then to keep a sharade like this up for 40 years and involving 4,000 people.

posted on Jul, 10 2005 @ 07:33 PM
Closed due to dozens of identical topics.

Please see as mentioned by Seekerof.

new topics

top topics


log in