It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WissNX01
Will another war solve all our problems? I don't think so.
It will if our enemies are dead.
Originally posted by xman_in_blackx
To say that Al Qaeda doesn't exist is to say that Salafism and takfirs do not exist either. You might as well stick your head in the sand and click your heels three times and say "there's no place like Mecca... there's no place like Mecca."
Stop blaming Al-Qaeda on the London Bombings!
Originally posted by SportyMB
Stop blaming Bush, America and Apple pie and for all the worlds problems.
Originally posted by hardbodyactiv
Ok. I've had enough of this crap. I was listening to Talk Sport (Britain's most listened to radio station)as this happened and was alerted to the first attack that was described as a possible derailment or explosion on a London Underground train. Then the power grid suffered a total shutdown, which was undetermined at the immediate time but was attributed to and associated with the train. Then things went crazy and there was reports of more explosions from Edgware Road, Russell Square and so on.
Yes, obviously there was immediate speculation from the presenters of the show that this may be due to a terrorist act but during my viewing of Sky News at the same time, the Police were quick to quash this as a potential and that this was no more than speculation.
It was only when this latest incarnation of Al Quaeda took responsibility via the web-site that the media speculation was acknowledged by the Police.
Originally posted by 0951
Perhaps this was just one radio station reporting on events ?
I was at work. I and others sat on the BBC news website.
The initial reports, (at maybe the stage of the 2nd bomb) were of a power surge. By maybe the third, or certainly the fourth tho' a link with terrorism was being made and headlining the story, and this theme matured quickly to become the cause on the next update (replacing the power surge idea).
On the subject of AQ - does it actually matter if they exist as an entity, or as an idea ? and pretty much open to anyone to claim allegiance to. so is claiming it's 'AQ' really that significant a question?
Originally posted by websurfer
"stick your head in the sand" --> lol, maybe you should do that more often, If your convinced your right, I want to know why exactly you are participating in this thread.
there is something fishy behind Al-Qaeda
remember the train bombing in spain?? there wasn't nearly as much uproar about that as there is about the london bombing..........why? i geuss it is only 'tragic' when americians and british die
Originally posted by eudaimonia
Originally posted by WissNX01
Yeah, its all about Bush and Blair wanting this for thier war on terror.
Yes, it is.
Its all about the Jews and thier secret plan to take over the world. Oh heavens NO!, dont blame proven terrorists or Al Qaeda!, for Islam is a peaceful religion and Al Qaeda is a humanitarian group!!
Now you're being dramatic and you're not taking this seriously at all. This is not a joke wiss. Maybe you should do a bit more research on the existance of Al-Qaeda first before you reject everything I say.
Bull crap! Al Qaeda and the Taliban oppressed and destroyed the people and country of Afganistan. They have been responsible for bombing anything, everything, and everyone under the sun. They use children to strap bombs to, and march them off to blow up other MUSLIMS up. Oh, lets not forget the train bombing is Spain, the USS Cole, or that little insignifigant event of 9-11. Lets ignore the fact that these peaceful people like to chop off heads and put it on the internet. Heck, now they are capturing thier own people and knocking them off.
Yeah, lets just keep blaming Bush and Blair.
Really? Funny how you mentioned 9/11. Blair and Bush's War in Iraq approval numbers has been dropping considerably. More than 65% disapprove the War on Iraq in Britain. Americans are coming very close to that number. Get the picture?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by jsobecky
Considering the fact that Bush's poll numbers have been tanking,
Totally untrue. You want to see poor ratings, look at Chirac's.
YEP. Chirac is VERY unpopular. Hey .. and didn't he just dis'
Britain?? Complain about their food and everything? Say they were
'the worst next to Denmark (or whatever)'. And he is very upset that
Paris didn't get the Olympics, but London did. That interrupts his plan
to try to make France the center of the world and relevant. Yep ...
musta' been Chirac. Heck, why not? The anti-bush folks use that
kind of logic to 'make a case' against Bush all the time.
For those who just looooooooove to say 'Bush did it' ... they guy is
a lame duck president who no longer cares if he is 'popular' or not.
He can't run again. To claim that he had the bombs set off in London ...
well ... that is just silly.
Here is a novel idea ... place the blame where it belongs .. on the
radical muslim terrorists.
Originally posted by Gazrok
I think it's important to point out how the media is pushing this idea to the american public that the London Bombings is related to a terrorist organization called Al-Qaeda.
How is it blaming someone when just such a group CLAIMS responsibility?
Sure, you could point to some grand conspiracy of a false site, false group, etc. but even the media keeps repeating OVER AND OVER that this claim is still not confirmed.
Al-Qaeda does exist, and so does Bin Laden. However, they aren't the only terrorist organization in the world either. Also, any organization could call themselves "Al-Qaeda" and not necessarily even be linked to the actual group, just as every organization with "Jihad" in the name....isn't necessarily part of one entity.