|
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 02:04 PM by Odium
|
Originally posted by Riwka
Ok - You mean we should build the security fence more quickly.
That is true.
But this topic is of last week's terror attacks against London - this is not linked the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Rebekka
No I don't.
I think you(country) should agree to go along with the guidelines set out by the International Community in 1947 (Resolution 181) or they should be
invaded and the rule should be forced upon them.
The wall should be pulled down.
The Israeli war criminals should be brought to justice.
Can't have one rule for one (Iraq) and one for another (Israel), the World won't work that way.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 02:14 PM by infinite
|
Originally posted by Odium
I think you(country) should agree to go along with the guidelines set out by the International Community in 1947 (Resolution 181) or they should be
invaded and the rule should be forced upon them.
America backs Israel,
America would defend Israel if she is invaded
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 02:21 PM by subz
|
Originally posted by infinite
America backs Israel,
America would defend Israel if she is invaded
America also backs alot of countries. If, for example, the British/Australians invaded Israel and restored the Israeli nation to a lawful setting, I
doubt the Americans would retaliate against Britain and Australia.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 02:25 PM by mpeake
|
Don't know if this has been posted yet, but CNN is reporting that the
bomb suspects are British citizens.
"Particularly with the shock of knowing that those that have perpetrated this were actually born and brought up in this country, I think it is
particularly important we recognize the worldwide dimension of this," Blair said.
"I would ask for the same measured and calm response from the country that has characterized it since last Thursday," Blair told the House of
Commons.
"This is a small group of extremists. Not one who can be ignored, but neither should it define Muslims in Britain who are overwhelmingly law-abiding,
decent members of our society," he said Wednesday.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 02:25 PM by Riwka
|
Originally posted by Odium
I think you(country) should agree to go along with the guidelines set out by the International Community in 1947 (Resolution 181) or they should be
invaded and the rule should be forced upon them.
Can't have one rule for one (Iraq) and one for another (Israel), the World won't work that way.
You are running offtopic..... but here is something old - which I think is new for you:
There's no comparison between Iraq's refusal to comply with UN security council resolutions and Israel's refusal to do so
WHY?
The UN distinguishes between two sorts of Security Council resolution. Those passed under
Chapter Six deal with the peaceful resolution of disputes and entitle the council to make non-binding recommendations.
Those under
Chapter Seven give the council broad powers to take action, including warlike action, to deal with “threats to the peace, breaches of
the peace, or acts of aggression”.
Resolutions under Chapter Seven, binding on all UN members, were used against Iraq.
None of the resolutions relating to the Israeli-Arab conflict comes under Chapter Seven
- and put it simply:
It is impossible to break non-binding recommendations
Rebekka
[edit on 13-7-2005 by Riwka]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 02:27 PM by infinite
|
Originally posted by mpeake
Don't know if this has been posted yet, but CNN is reporting that the
bomb suspects are British citizens.
Yeah
its been posted, The police stated that 5pm yesterday
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 02:31 PM by subz
|
Riwka, that is solely because the United States veto's anything even resembling resolutions that fall under the chapter 7 definition!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 02:38 PM by mpeake
|
Originally posted by infinite
Originally posted by mpeake
Don't know if this has been posted yet, but CNN is reporting that the
bomb suspects are British citizens.
Yeah
its been posted, The police stated that 5pm yesterday
Thanks! I didn't feel like going back thru all the previous pages to check
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 02:40 PM by infinite
|
Originally posted by subz
Riwka, that is solely because the United States veto's anything even resembling resolutions that fall under the chapter 7 definition!
Well said
Completely true subz
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 02:59 PM by Riwka
|
Well .......
G'd bless America
But:
It was the Arab world which rejected 1947 resolution 181 and started the first war against Israel ......
BTW: ......Do You know "the history of Israel in a nutshell"?
They declared war.
We won.
Let's eat.
...ok - could we go back to the topic now?
Rebekka
[edit on 13-7-2005 by Riwka]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 03:43 PM by Odium
|
No they did not at all.
Irgun did not disarm, which broke U.N. Resolution 181.
They attacked.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 03:55 PM by intrepid
|
Topic guys. The arguement that is flying around now isn't even in the right part of the world. Don't make me Mapquest how far it is between the UK
and Israel.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-7-2005 @ 01:21 AM by Seraphim_Serpente
|
Quote: "Topic guys. The argument that is flying around now isn't even in the right part of the world. Don't make me Mapquest how far it is between
the UK and Israel."
That is NOT the Point! "GLOBAL JIHAD". "GLOBAL" War on Terror! Yes they ARE trying to turn London & New York & Washington into the INSANITY that
is going on in "Israel/Palestine"! That IS the Point!
Scotland Yard just announced the Identities of the 4 "SUICIDE Bombers" (Drum Roll Please): (Dis-Enfranchised Moslem) British Citizens of Pakistani
Decent! This is what is called a “Sleeper Cell” that was Activated! This is not a MOVIE kids – this is REALLY HAPPENING!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-7-2005 @ 07:16 AM by infinite
|
Lindsey Germail is 4th bomb suspect. (female name) 4th bomber was a Jamacian-born Briton
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-7-2005 @ 07:51 AM by CTID56092
|
Lindsay I think. Definitely male, Afro Caribbean. Had been renting the house in Aylesbury for 3 months with his female partner
(BBC Radio)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-7-2005 @ 07:54 AM by infinite
|
Originally posted by CTID56092
Lindsay I think. Definitely male, Afro Caribbean. Had been renting the house in Aylesbury for 3 months with his female partner
(BBC Radio)
Thanks for that
ill check the news stations in a bit
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 14-7-2005 @ 01:26 PM by infinite
|
im glad a date has been put on this thread,
i got chills everytime i read the title
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-7-2005 @ 01:30 PM by Odium
|
Anyone know if he was a Muslim as well?
I've yet to hear anything on that.
It'll indeed be a slap in the fact to a lot of people if he isn't.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-7-2005 @ 01:35 PM by infinite
|
i think he is a muslim, im not sure....
the details of him are unknown to the media, i believe
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-7-2005 @ 04:09 PM by Odium
|
I'm really shocked...
That guy, Lindsey Germaine (which should/would be Germaine) first, from my understanding lives where I used to and where my folks still have a house,
Aylesbury. I will look into it and find out if he visited the Mosque in that area.
I am really shocked by that.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |