It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Americas Settlement Theory Challenged (moved from ATSNN)

page: 1

log in


posted on Jul, 6 2005 @ 03:36 AM
The prevailing theory of when and how the first Americans arrived has long been the so-called "Clovis First" theory which states that the first Americans crossed over a land bridge along the Aleutian islands chain thought to have existed near the end of the Pleistocene period (about 11,500 years ago). According to this theory, the first Americans walked from Asia to the New World and then spread out across first North America and then Central and South America. Any evidence to the contrary has been questioned and for the most part discarded as inconclusive or questionable. New evidence from Mexico however poses a serious challenge to this theory.

Full story at
WILL A FOOTPRINT REWRITE THE HISTORY BOOKS?, July 05 Scientists have unearthed human footprints in central Mexico which they claim are around 40,000 years old, shattering previous theories on how humans first colonised the Americas. An international team of geoarchaeologists, led by Dr Silvia Gonzalez from Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU), who discovered the footprints in an abandoned quarry in September 2003, have subjected them to a number of dating techniques. These include Uranium series dating carried out on animal bones from the site by Dr Alistair Pike of Bristol University’s Department of Archaeology and Anthropology.

The researchers analysed 269 footprints, both animal and human, found close to the Cerro Toluquilla volcano in the Valsequillo Basin, near the city of Puebla, 130 km southeast of Mexico City.

The footprints were preserved as trace fossils in volcanic ash along what was once the shoreline of an ancient volcanic lake. Climate variations and the eruption of the Cerro Toluquilla volcano caused lake levels to rise and fall, exposing the Xalnene volcanic ash layer. Early Americans walked across this new shoreline, leaving behind footprints that soon became covered in more ash and lake sediments. The trails became submerged when the water levels rose again, preserving the footprints.

Today, the Xalnene ash, now as hard as concrete, is used locally as a building material. Dr Gonzalez and her research team were able to see the footprints without carrying out any excavation as quarry workers had already removed between 2 – 3 metres of lake sediments that had been deposited on top of the volcanic ash.

The footprints were mapped and scanned using laser technology and reproduced as 3-d images and models at the University of Bournemouth. Approximately 60 per cent of the prints were found to be human, with 36 per cent of the human prints classified as children’s because of their size. Several short trails of footprints are visible in some parts of the quarry and it is estimated that the adult humans were between 117 and 190 cm tall.

We were working with the team from LJMU and Oxford on a project dating human remains in Mexico when the footprints were discovered. Dating footprints presented a bigger challenge than the bones we were dating, so we assembled a team of experts, including scientists from The Open University in the UK and the Australian National University.

“We had to visit the site several times to hunt for bones, teeth, shells, peat, volcanic lava, quartz rich sediments and other materials suitable for dating. It took us nearly two years, but we really wanted to be sure we got the dating right, especially since such an early date will radically change our understanding of the peopling of The Americas.”

The results of this extensive dating programme indicate that the human and animal footprints preserved in the upper part of the Xalnene Ash are older than 40,000 years, thus posing serious challenges to considered wisdom on the settlement of the continent

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.

Previous finds in Brazil and elsewhere indicating humans were here at least 35,000 years ago have largely been swept under the rug due to a lack of conclusive dating evidence. Adherents of the "Clovis First Model" have been very outspoken in their defense of the land bridge theory and have thus far beaten back all attempts to supplant it. It therefore comes as no surprise that the researchers in Mexico have exhaustively pursued every means possible to date their findings conclusively.

The academic controversy concerning the peopling of the Americas has been raging for around 50-60 years now and it is high time that textbooks about the subject get changed to reflect all the evidence available, not just that favoring the Clovis First Model.

Related News Links:

[edit on 6-7-2005 by Astronomer68]


log in