 |
|
Topic started on 6-7-2005 @ 01:47 AM by warthog911
|
WOW the tsunami really did disturbed the earth's rotation
here is the link livescience.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2005 @ 01:50 AM by Figher Master FIN
|
Oh, nice... now I can surf on ATS one second longer...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2005 @ 01:50 AM by Joshm2u
|
whooppie. 1 second wow. i have probbaly wasted more than 2 seconds of ur life, just by u reading this.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2005 @ 04:20 AM by UofCinLA
|
FYI - said nothing about Tsunami in that link....
Leap seconds get added as needed via drag from moon, internal flows and mass increases. This isn't a static ball of dirt - we get a bunch of space
debris adding to our mass every second of every day....
Maybe it's HAARP..??
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2005 @ 06:01 AM by amb1063
|
wowieeeeeeeeeeee
1 whole extra second????? WHAT can i do with all this spare time!!  
angie
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2005 @ 10:18 AM by cmdrkeenkid
|
This is really nothing too uncommon. You can see in the article that there have been 23 leap seconds in the past 35 years.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2005 @ 08:14 PM by Shadow88
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-7-2005 @ 02:13 PM by Gazrok
|
Maybe it's HAARP..?? 
That's a good way to get smacked, hehe...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-7-2005 @ 02:32 AM by WissNX01
|
Its not just because of the tsunami. The Earth rotates on an axis, and orbits the sun. Gravity might be a constant, but outside forces are known to
slow the planets orbit and rotation. Adding a second has been suggested before the tsunami.
Even so, there is no way to prevent an earthquake from happening. Bitching about an extra second seem pointless to me.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 03:24 PM by Dmitriy
|
Yep, just in the right places the earth gets occasional tugs there and tugs there, it for the most part evens out. In the article, it said the moon
was our biggest factor.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 04:21 PM by bpletcj
|
So what day will have the extra second added to it.
Will it be December 31st at 11:59 and 61 seconds.
Then the ball might not drop at the right time, thats no way to start of the new year.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 04:48 PM by MaskedAvatar
|
Originally posted by bpletcj
So what day will have the extra second added to it.

I also came to enquire on this extremely relevant question. I'd prefer to save my second till I need it in late October.
I find it difficult to conceive that our years are exactly 365.25 earth rotations long, and that 23 leap seconds in 35 years have fixed the
accumulating errors of the Gregorian calendar period. But my astronomical observation is not steeped in enough astronomy to prove this.
"The International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service in Paris keeps track of time by measuring the Earth's rotation, which varies, and by
an atomic clock, which is unwavering. When a difference in the two clocks shows up, the IERS adds or subtracts a second to the year."
To which I say, what BS. This is a conspiracy, literally.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 05:19 PM by Amorymeltzer
|
First off, the tsunami did nothing but damage and kill. The earthquake did a lot.
Second, bpletcj, it'd be 11:59:60.
Thirdly, MaskedAvatar, I believe it's closer to 365.2425, which is why we don't have a leap century every 400 years.
It's a common thing. They update it all the time in Bulletin C. That thing basically
details it all right there. You can find all you'll ever want to know about it through that site.
Fascinating read. How sad is it that I've had it bookmarked for a months?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-7-2005 @ 09:54 PM by shadowstriker
|
1 sec. is that all. what can 1 sec do for us or do to hurt.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-7-2005 @ 04:06 PM by bpletcj
|
Second, bpletcj, it'd be 11:59:60.
: 
Good point, I guess thats like counting the year zero between 1 B.C. and 1 A.D.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Edited to get rid of italics
[edit on 15-7-2005 by bpletcj]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-7-2005 @ 07:18 PM by Amorymeltzer
|
Well, one second adds up over millenia. But, far more more importantly, it means we're being correct. And that is worth quite a lot.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-7-2005 @ 06:33 AM by num1
|
Originally posted by Joshm2u
whooppie. 1 second wow. i have probbaly wasted more than 2 seconds of ur life, just by u reading this. 
haha yeah..i go with that..same feeling
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |