posted on Jul, 9 2005 @ 12:30 AM
at last im down to the last post. sadly india got involved
must have been due to the iq
its great that we can speculate who will win if one attacks first or the other but the fact is that both sides will lose. and as we all know japans
military is a self defence force (per their constituition) so fat chance of them attacking first.
oh just for the record, i have direct relatives in both nations so my views arent based on nationalistic sentiments.
ok...so china will attack japan if it develops nuclear capability, hmmm...
1) ive heard china say a lot of things the last couple of years (read taiwan) and it gets boring after a while...if they really want taiwan so badly,
make the first move and lets see but again when it comes to crunch time its the real men who make the decisions and they know what theyre doing (the
2) its nice that we can safely deduce who will win a conflict by quoting how many of what type of fighter planes they have or whatever but lets
consider what would prevent china from going to war with japan or any other nation. im not saying they shouldnt go to war, iraq is getting a little
stale so a new one will be refreshing lol
3) and finally...china is saying it can have nuclear arsenal but its perceived enemies cant? damn...it ll be great if you can force all your foes to
fight you with chopsticks when you have swords...but yea i understand that a few ktons of warheads going off will affect the innocent sunbathers in
bondi or st kilda.
if you ask me...nations can have all the nuclear arsenal they want provided they relocate a son or daughter of the person who will make the call to
launch at each and every city thats a perceived target...and if they still take the shot and win...the people should kick the # out of him afters