This topic is in the Political Ideology discussion forum.  (rss)


Democrats are Commies


<<  1    2    3  >>



reply posted on 15-8-2003 @ 06:59 PM by chebob


CiderGood is right. Communism doesn't work because the greedy won't compromise and aren't prepared to be "on par" with the poor. It's the biggest tragedy to happen to mankind......a Doctrine that want's nothing but good for all, cannot work because there are too many people who only want the "good" to be in their hands.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-8-2003 @ 07:03 PM by JediMaster


I don't like Communism. They are godless,they want incoem equality which is stupid. I'm sticking with capitalism where I can make alot of money.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-8-2003 @ 07:11 PM by chebob



Originally posted by JediMaster
I don't like Communism. They are godless


Hey, thats labelling!! I'd love to see Communism working, but I'm FAR from Godless!! Communists are only Godless if you consider God to be a facist dictator (like most Anti-God people think), but God is not just another form of government.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-8-2003 @ 07:31 PM by uNBaLaNCeD

This party stuff............

..........look how much like a wedge it works.
Do you think this is an accident?.It works exactly like it was meant to,it drives everyone apart,so they argue and fight,never being able to work together to get something done,arguing about which 'party 'can do the right thing or do it better.

Fact is there aren't two parties,just one party with two names,Same agenda.

This thing the politicians have done is working perfectly.

all rights reserved without prejudice U.C.C.1-207



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-8-2003 @ 11:59 PM by PolskieWojsko


Ahh hell I'm having a shot.

Oh yeah Socialism all the way.

Na Zdrowie!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-8-2003 @ 09:11 AM by CiderGood_HeadacheBad



Originally posted by hellfireburns
I think there should be no competing parties because it brings the worst in Politians; who will do any thing to win a election..I think what would make sense would be a single party that served the people, but of course that would never happen because our government is corrupted


In a one party state, how would you change your government if they were not acting with the nation's best interests at heart? What do you do if they start to abuse their power, which they inevitably would?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-8-2003 @ 09:30 AM by uNBaLaNCeD

That's a hard question.......

,but it is obviously what the politicians are expecting to happen,the patriot act was written with dissenters in mind,anyone knows that there are no real terrorists here,there is no real threat,the only real threat is how terrified the citizenry get dancing around on the end of the media puppet string.

The politicians are feeling terrorised,and transfering it onto us as a way to distract us.people are catching onto their bull$hit,unless of course they profit from their bull$hit policies.

it looks to me like the terror-ism,was used to write laws to keep some from making too much noise about what we all know is wrong here.

I really have no idea exactly what should be done,and if I really spoke my mind I would ...........

They ARE abusing their power.

it is a one party system.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-8-2003 @ 09:47 AM by uNBaLaNCeD

See.

Whe the goin gets rough,the politicians scurry into a hole.
www.cuttingedge.org...
let em fight their own wars,let em be accountable for their neglect.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 01:05 AM by xaos

I like cheese too Thorfinn

Okay, Dark Assasin is outnumbered and heavily beaten.

*Xaos' moral princible kicks in and he decides to help the underdog.*

First of all how can you disbelieve the statement that "All Democrats are Commies." And,... Oh, screw it. That position is totally undefensible. I mean of all the positions you could have stated this would have to be th worst. Even "Tom Daschle is a flaming homosexual faggot" could be supported with a little help from photoshop.

I would take time to write a lengthy rebuttal to DA's thesis, but that has been done already. The only serious thing I shall say is that Democrats are just as big supporters of big buisness as Republicans.

XASO



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 01:20 AM by jagdflieger


Democrats, Republicans. What is the difference. You have the Federal Reserve Party of the Left, then you have the Federal Reserve Party of the Right. Either way, it is still the Federal Reserve Party.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 03:19 PM by uNBaLaNCeD

Jagd..

It is amazing how simple it really is,the truth is buried under a whole bunch of other crap,too many people pay too much attention to the unimportant distractions and never stumble upon the truth of it all.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 03:32 PM by banjoechef



Originally posted by DarkAssassin
Sorry about earlier this is my first time at a forum and after reading a few posts I decided to put more thought into my posts. Let me begin explaing my assumptions.

1. Alot of the Dummycrats I met hate money,they hate having money,they hate tax cuts were you get some of your money back. Who would pass up $400 dollars a kid,back?


it's because you don't need money when your the ass richest country in the world and your makin money like crazy, and why wouldn't they hate tax cuts they want the monye they don't want you to ahve it do u think your in a free country what with your curfews and all


2. Alot of the Dummycrats I met have no morals,they support abortion,the ACLU,they want religion taken out of our lives. According to the ACLU and the Dummycrats I can't pray or wear a shirt that says "Jesus Loves You".


no they aren't trying to take religion from your lives theya re trying to take it from the government and from the economy and education and such because theya re trying to keep all the different religions happy and not piss off all those who i guess u would call heathens seeing as they don't practse your religion which u seemt o think is THE religion if a country should be run by it's ideals


3. They want to goverment to control the economy and they want the goverment to piss away our taxpayer dollars into usless crap. Who realy gives a damn about gay Indians?


lol the government doesn't alreayd piss away your taxmoney into .... military??? lol yes thoise gay human indians don't deserve to live well whatsoever, they should have to do it all by themselves with their lack of resources and huge inpayable international debts.

i think i'm done now



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 03:33 PM by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf


Democraps are Commies..that makes Repugnants .....Nazis! And world war 2 was fought between the commies and nazis.heres an idea:

World War 2 real re enactment!

Well get all the republicans, politicians and party members, arm them. Well do the same for the dems.then we will throw them in some place, like, montana....to re enact the whole war and blast each other into oblivion! How abotu that! Then they can argue, fight, and kill each other like naizs and commies are supposed to do, and the rest of us, now lacking the two dominant parties, will have to chose other.........for once, we might actually get someone in who isnt part of the conspiracy, if were lucky!

Let the fighting commence!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 03:44 PM by banjoechef


i'm pro-marxism but only because i believe in living not working, anyways all the stupid monkey politicians are all form the same place, they say they'll do different things but the same # will always happen, all the ones who try to do different stuff get killed, it's true with all world leaeders, jfk, even pope whats his name, paul the first i think it was, got killed cuz he was gonna move the mafia men in the papal bank to lower positions so there hows ur christianity fer morality eh, also you posted earlier about why would you want to post a link to a slanted website, why would u develope your ideals from a slanted website? also the only way to prove you opinion is to give something slanted towards your opinion, if someone wants to see the other side which any open minded halfsheep would do, they can find it themselves, but prove yourslef my boy prove yourself!!!!

gosh i'm on a rant today lol forgive me if i've wronged you oh supermods this unsupported opinion just really bugged me



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-8-2003 @ 03:50 PM by CiderGood_HeadacheBad



Originally posted by banjoechef
...also you posted earlier about why would you want to post a link to a slanted website, why would u develope your ideals from a slanted website? also the only way to prove you opinion is to give something slanted towards your opinion, if someone wants to see the other side which any open minded halfsheep would do, they can find it themselves, but prove yourslef my boy prove yourself!!!!

gosh i'm on a rant today lol forgive me if i've wronged you oh supermods this unsupported opinion just really bugged me


I think we all knew that his claims were a little unfounded in the first place, and they have in the course of the thread been countered and disproved. In my mind if he doesn't have any sources of evidence to back himself up to begin with, he's lost the debate.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-8-2003 @ 05:53 PM by KrazyIvan



Originally posted by Gazrok
Well, I'm a rather conservative democrat.... You're making a ton of assumptions here, Dark.... I'm totally against handouts to those not willing to get up off their lazy asses and get a job. And, I can see the value of tax cuts to the rich to stimulate economic growth... But I also feel religion has no place in government. I also believe in a woman's right to choose. And I believe that there are some areas government should have more control, and some less.

Lumping all democrats together is a false arguement at best....


ok how about most democrates then?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-8-2003 @ 07:45 PM by Greyhaven


When you break it right down: (the extremes)

Republican: Put controll back into the hands of the people and let the government controll only things that they NEED to... like National Defense and such.

Democrat: Give the government controll of everything you don't want to be bothered with. Welfare, social security, banning and controlling substances, etc...

It's curious that anyone on this site would want the government more in controll of their lives than they already are. Perhaps some people need to rethink exactly what they are voting for and the consequences of having those people in our government.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3  >>







Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:




























ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , , , ,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.006 seconds
Page processed in 0.113 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread