It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
- who by all accounts was supposed to win.
London, Jun. 21 - A 49-year-old former commander in Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards catapulted to super-politician status by the unexpected results of Friday’s presidential elections in Iran found himself at the centre of a growing controversy over allegations of vote fraud, his own shadowy past, and speculations over a crafty scheme by the top leaders of the clerical regime to lure voters to the polling booths.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the mayor of Tehran, was almost ignored by the domestic and international media until the last few days of the presidential campaign, and was widely expected to be among the five candidates who would be eliminated in the first round.
But Ahmadinejad, who belongs to the ultra-conservative camp within the theocratic regime, had something which placed him ahead of the other candidates: the nationwide powerful machinery of the Revolutionary Guards and the paramilitary Bassij, as well as the active blessing and support of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
“In the last week of the campaign, the Supreme Leader decided that Ahmadinejad represented the best chance among his favoured candidates in the race, who also included [former police chief Mohammad-Baqer] Qalibaf and [former state broadcasting chief Ali] Larijani”, an influential Tehran businessman with close ties to the ultra-conservative faction said.
“Khamenei instructed his son Mojtaba and his security chief Hojjatol-Islam Hejazi to devote all the resources of the Revolutionary Guards and other agencies controlled by the Supreme Leader’s office to ensure that Ahmadinejad would reach the second round”, he said.
Some observers remain sceptical as to whether Ahmadinejad is a genuine candidate who is being backed by Ayatollah Khamenei and his ultra-conservative faction to emerge as Iran’s next president, or whether he is being used as a “monster” to scare people into voting for “the lesser evil”, namely ex-President Ayatollah Ali-Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani.
“If you look at the way the Khamenei-Rafsanjani duo worked together throughout the 1990s, it wouldn’t be beyond them to be using Ahmadinejad as a demonic candidate to rally people around Rafsanjani”, said Simon Bailey of the London-based Gulf Intelligence Monitor.
“Here are two men who have been rivals since the early days of the Islamic revolution, yet each one knows that he needs the other one to keep the regime on its feet”, Bailey added.
Hossein Shaheen, a Paris-based analyst, agreed. “Khamenei didn’t want Rafsanjani to be the next President. But as the old saying goes, if you can’t stop them, join them. Both men have a vested interest in raising voter turnout, which would be critical for the continuity of their regime under highly sensitive domestic and international circumstances. A high turnout would enable them to thumb their noses at [United States President George W.] Bush. They can always settle their own accounts later”, he said.
What has strengthened speculation that Ahmadinejad is being used as a tool for scaring young people and women to rush to the polling stations in the runoff that will be held next Friday are a series of extremely unpopular statements by the former Tehran mayor and his close associates since his unexpected success in the first round.
Addressing a nationwide television audience, Ahmadinejad’s chief spokesman said last night that the kafiya (a popular headdress worn by men in Arab countries) must become the national headdress in Iran. Ahmadinejad himself said in an interview on Sunday that one of his top priorities will be “to implement sexual segregation in public transport systems and educational institutes”.
“These are suicidal statements for a presidential candidate in a country where the support of women and young people is essential to win,” Bailey said. “Ahmadinejad is certainly a radical Islamists, but we saw him in the municipal elections two years ago. He is not as dumb as he is acting right now”.
Originally posted by AWingAndASigh:
Based on the evidence, I think it's not unlikely that he could have been involved in the hostage taking. However, the picture this thread is about is not the man the hostages are talking about when they say the president-elect was one of their captors.
Thx for the links.
Originally posted by AWingAndASigh
Thx for the links.
You're very welcome.
It's why we're here - Deny Ignorance!
Originally posted by spacedoubt
Based on the same evidence. I believe the guy in the old photo,
is now the "elected leader" of Iran.
Now just by looking at the photos it is clear that the terrorist shown in the first image is not the President, the President as a student looks nothing like this man. Also notice that the most defining feature is the nose in these profile shots, and the nose of the President is totally different to the nose of the terrorist. Therefore, and the BBC concurs, the man in the AP photo is NOT the President.
i think it is part of Bush's plan to invade Iran.
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
Remember that people do lose some of there height after a certain age.