It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Stealth Spy
IMO the US has the capacity to strike China without getting struck itself. China is only a mid grade power as yet and its air force and navy are no match for even a quarter of the respective forces.
Besides China is not Russia and neither has Russia's tech level or its level of weaponry.
China has just 30 low-tech ICBM's and the US is sufficiently prepared to fend off those. Check out the US's anti-missile systems
The US cannot survive a Russian attack but can take a Chinese nuke attack with ease.
If the US attacks a nuclear country like China it will not be the end of the world but the end of China with an unscratched USA.
If the US strikes first with all its delivery systems and all its force it might finish China's air, ground and sea defences within a week.
China will be defeated before it can think of a retaliation.
Why do you think the US is the worlds larger spender of defence for over a decade by faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar ?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Oh and by the way, great job quoting an article that only went up to 1998 Chinawhite. The Aegis THAAD project has moved WAY ahead in that time ais capable of bringing down incomeing warheads. The ABL has fired, and is mounted in the plane and is starting to fly. The missile defense tests in Kwajelin aren't going as well, but they've had successful hits during tests.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
All I have to say about not being able to shoot down ballistic missiles is this.
USS Lake Eerie CG70. Four shootdowns of incoming ballistic missiles, 1 miss due to a software failure in the missile. I live less than 200 miles from the test range they were shooting at. Trust me, I know this fact well, as Lake Eerie is homeported 10 miles away from where I live.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Actually it's 2001, my mistake. "In December 2001" But again, do you have ANY idea how much things change in 4 years? And what does an article talking about how we spent money have to do with shooting down missiles? If you read it it says the 100 missiles woudn't stand a chance against hundreds of incoming RUSSIAN warheads. It mentions ABL, and the interceptor that they are testing in Kwajelin, but not THAAD, which is very succesful. 80% so far, against an INBOUND warhead. That means that 8 out of 10 targets would survive, and that's only going to go up as they work out any bugs in the system. So what exactly does this have to do with not being able to shoot down an ICBM? ABL will do the job, THAAD will do the job, and if they can work out the bugs, the other system (I can't remember what they call it) will do the job too.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
THAAD? It's a simple software upgrade to the AEGIS system. You plug a disk in so that the radar will track the faster ICBM warhead on the way down. Lake Eerie uses the same missile to hit them that ALL the Aegis cruisers are switching to.
ABL is in flight testing, and is getting ready to do the first airborne shot. The first is flying, the second is being modded, the third and fourth are almost completed if they aren't already.
Flight phases
The following flight phases can be distinguished:
* boost phase - 3 to 4 minutes (for a solid rocket shorter than for a liquid-propellant rocket); altitude at the end of this phase is 150 -200 km, typical burn-out speed is 7 km/s
* midcourse phase - ca. 25 minutes - suborbital flight in an elliptic orbit, i.e. the orbit is part of an ellipse with vertical major axis; the apogee (halfway the midcourse phase) is at an altitude of typically ca. 1200 km; the semi-major axis is between one half of the radius of the Earth and the radius; the projection of the orbit on the Earth's surface is a great circle - the missile may release a few independent warheads, a large number of decoys, and chaff
* re-entry phase (starting at an altitude of 100 km) - 2 minutes
Originally posted by Zaphod58
THAAD? It's a simple software upgrade to the AEGIS system. You plug a disk in so that the radar will track the faster ICBM warhead on the way down. Lake Eerie uses the same missile to hit them that ALL the Aegis cruisers are switching to.
ABL is in flight testing, and is getting ready to do the first airborne shot. The first is flying, the second is being modded, the third and fourth are almost completed if they aren't already.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Originally posted by ulshadow
Originally posted by chinawhite
this war is going to be fought for oil or other resources.
[edit on 29-6-2005 by chinawhite]
So every war the US got into is about oil? sad really
sorry Vietnam didnt have ani oil, they did have a lot of rice.. but in anicase who knows wat we will fight for, maybe bananas.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
The systems being developed and tested now will and cannot stop more then a few ICBM‘s coming at the US, they will improve in the future but as of now we would not be able to shoot down most of the Chinese ICBM’s. The systems as of now are not designed to handle mass number of warheads they are designed for countries like N. Korea that may have 5 or less nuclear missiles.