It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by FearNoEvil
The difference is the Bible is a book of myths which have no evidence backing them up (at least not the supernatural elements). There is no evidence anywhere in the Universe for magical creation.
Evolution on the other hand has genetic and fossil evidence enough to prove the theory a hundred times over.
That's why Creation versus Evolution is pointless as the thread says, its not comparing apples to oranges its comparing apples to bricks. Since Creationism is based in myth and magic and isn't science there's no reason for real scientists to bother debating.
[edit on 22-5-2010 by Titen-Sxull]
Regarding Dragiero's statements, it does not seem logical that if nature could make something as complex as the human body that nature could easily make.... oh say... a pencil, or even a watch.
Originally posted by gncnew
no evidence of a monkey becoming a man. Just like there is no evidence of a rat becoming an elephant.
Originally posted by gncnew
reply to post by Titen-Sxull
Dude... one kind of fish into another kind of fish IS NOT a fish to a rat...
educate yourself hommie. Nice link, and nice vocabulary. You should read your own link next time.
Now, you show me a link where that fish grew some legs and started walking... or maybe where the rodent grew hooves?
Like I said - the evidence is not there.
Now, you show me a link where that fish grew some legs and started walking... or maybe where the rodent grew hooves?
Originally posted by FearNoEvil
Just show me one undisputed fossilized skeleton of the “The Missing Link” then give me another 20 years for it to be debunked like all the rest.