It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NWO - Earth is a Prison Colony, and has been for a long time...

page: 2
1
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 02:04 PM
link   
Ultimately, I don't care about what people have written down. I know how to deal with governments.

1. Abide by the law
2. Invest wisely
3. Think globally

The rest is backdrop. As such, I have plenty of time left over for the important things in life. Why waste time feeling indignant over words?




posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 02:16 PM
link   
will any of this really work?

is it really legit??

i am sick and tired of living under their corporate BS and i want to be FREE agian


i mean life just gets harder and harder with all the BS they put our strawmen under .... life doesnt have to be a struggle; but they make sure it is a struggle for all of us

if i deny my corporate strawman; what are the reprecussions???

ive read some stuff about this before but i didnt think it was real

can i still live in an apartment? can i still have a car? can i still buy food?
if i deny my strawman??

will the IRS come arrest me anyways?
will anyone arrest me anyways, just for trying to get out of the system??

im am just sick of living and supporting a system that grows from everyone elses losses; a system that creates poor hungery people and lets them die of starvation...their kids covered in flys dying

if i support their system than i support evil and if there is a God, i WILL be held accountable because i didnt fight that system of evil
which is tantamount to supporting evil

well....im really downtrodden....and this seems like the only light at the end of the tunnel

is this for real? can i deny my strawman?
have Any of you done it yet?

please im confused alot
please help me understand

ok to summerize; heres my Qs

1) is this for real
2) have any of you done it
3) what are the penaltys for rejecting your strawman
4) can i still live in my apartment
5) can i get paid for working
6) can i still drive my car legally
7) is there any other bad things that could happen

thanks for your time sorry for asking so much
but i really wanna know
its kinda like im running out of hope
and im becoming very cynical about life altogeather
sorry
i just want to take off these economic shackles
please help me free myself


Aim

posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 02:47 PM
link   
I suggest the above poster to view this website, it has much relevant information for yourself, if you are still questioning feel free to private message me with your MSN and I will add you.

And Shadow, what you say is fine, every decision is your OWN. But you do not realise that these shackles of income tax and false legality are what hold the poor to be poor. The national debt is money the Gov't owes to the PEOPLE, do not let them fool you into believing you OWE them ANYTHING. You have given your whole lifes efforts to the system for money? HA, money does not exist, 'money' is credit and debt. I can apply for credit card and max it out and never pay for the debt I owe because the letter they will send you does not EQUAL debt. Money is created solely with your SIGNATURE, all money is CREDIT & DEBT, true money stopped existing ages ago. Everytime you use your signature at a bank it can be used to CREATE credit, it is the one thing they use to create it, YOU are the one who has the power, not the banks, not the Gov't. If you borrow 1000 dollars and no other money exists how do you possibly believe 1100 dollars can be repaid? This false sense of needing to owe the banks back something for their service is INTIMIDATED onto the people, after simply analyzing it is easy to see it would never possibly work. YOU are the ones that keep the banks in business, it is not the banks that keep the people in business.

When you sign for a loan at the bank you are given an interest rate to adhere by. Did you realise that after you have signed the promisary note the bank can immediately loan 9 times up to what you promise to pay back to them? If you borrow 300,000 dollars the bank can loan 2.7 million dollars IMMEDIATELY after the loan has been created, THIS is how 'money' truly works. They have ALREADY profited from your promise to repay. They have profited solely by your SIGNATURE. Did you know after a loan is completely repaid (interest and all) you are legally allowed to request for your interest to be returned? It is YOUR INTEREST ON THE LOAN. The promisary note is what holds this shackle in place, if everyone requested to have them returned it would CRASH the economic 'pyramid' that is used to fund international commerce. YOU are a battery for economic commerce. If you have paid a million dollars in interest, the bank has loaned 9 million dollars in return. If the people (namely Gov'ts) that have borrowed 9 million dollars have paid 18 million dollars in interest the bank has then loaned 162 million dollars in return. IT CONTINUES, this is where the funds come from to pay for WARS and WMDs, this is the money that pays for the killing of innocence around the world.

YOU are the only person who can free Oneself from this system, and if you believe that as long as you pay your taxes and work a good career you will not be effected by it then you are WRONG. Nothing you 'own' is yours, it is property of the STRAWMAN, which is property of the corporations masquerading themselves as Gov't.

Heres something to think about, if the millions who were killed by Hitlers "Final Solution" had their paper work done they would still be alive today. The Gov'ts OWN your body if YOU credit YOUR body to be the property of the STRAWMAN. They tell you what 'YOU' can and cannot do, YOU are a slave.

www.wealth4freedom.com...
www.naturalperson.com...



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 08:10 PM
link   
What would life be like without this prison as you say it is? Much worse...



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 10:10 PM
link   
Here is an example I like to use:

In the U.K. the Government say I can't go on a motor-bike, without wearing a helmet. Yet why not? Well because I stand more chance of dying if I fall off. However is it not my body? Will I kill anyone else because of this? No.

So who does own my body? I can't even choose to wear a helmet or not, something so simple and I get no say? clearly, I do not own my body.

So who does?

Those who make profit from me living.



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 10:34 PM
link   
Bitching about wearing motorcycles is the best example of how we are prisoners, then someone please delete this thread.



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 10:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Frosty
Bitching about wearing motorcycles is the best example of how we are prisoners, then someone please delete this thread.


No I can list even more, it is just an easy example to show.

Another good one:

If I have a serious illness, which doctors can operate on me and save me and yet I say no, it is possible for two doctors to co-sign a form and do the operation on me against my will. No matter my views, morals or religion.

There are a lot of cases where we are no longer the owners of our body.

Who by I and any higher power(God, Fate, etc), have the right to decide when I die?



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 10:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by ShadowHasNoSource
I can not be held liable to a contract that was not fully disclosed upon signature. Until all contracts, that the U.S. considers me under, are disclosed in full; all contracts are null and void.


"An unrebutted affadavit stands as the truth in commerce."
One of the maxims of commerce. The concept is similar to a lien, which can be collected upon unless you challenge it.



posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 01:51 AM
link   
So why is it that most of you guys who state that we live in a prison planet and need to be free go into other forums and denounce Bush's actions to free the Iraqi people of a brutal and murderous dictator? By doing this, you are only contradicting yourself. Unless of course you thought the people of Iraq were already "free" with Saddam in power.
My assumption is that most of you either are young adults (25-35) entering into a world in which you don't like because you made poor choices leading to your current life-style, or that many of you never obtained a degree from a four year college, instead went to voc school or none at all, and are stuck with making $25K, or you are just lazy bastards.

Odium, if what you say is true, then why not move here to America or another country?


Aim

posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 05:02 AM
link   
Frosty, you did a poor job reading what I had to say. It's unfortunate that you blind yourself from what freedom truly is by attempting to agitate others. You live in Wonderland, a true card you are!



posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 11:04 AM
link   
Just my thoughts on income tax, We have to have some sort of regulation in place to fix the things our government (Voted by the people) have put in place for a better country, Where would you be with out roads etc.

Now before all the Patriots start saluting me,

What does very much concern me is all the legalize in the tax code etc. Anything with that much verbiage is meant to hide something. Our elected officials have voted for these things on our behalf though? How many here that believe in the NWO did the research on your congressman/women’s views and then held them accountable for it. That’s the way it works. I do believe the government is corrupt. We have helped them on this. We do not as a people care enough because of our own personal wealth (Compared to other countries) to rock the boat or perhaps we are just to lazy. There is a way to fix it. But its very unlikely we can get a large enough percentage of Americans to care enough to fix the corruption. To be involved enough to know what laws are being made and who they affect and then if you don’t agree about it visit your state or federal congressmen/women.

Funny thing is we do hold the key, but its a hell of alot easier to blame it on Shadow governments and evil corporations, which you cannot do anything about. Then to get off all of our @sses and follow what real democracy has given us.

Granted it is not an easy struggle, and I do understand that the people with the money who fund our officials and dictate alot of policy will continue to do so because we allow it. They have fattened us up like pigs, happy content pigs who have the ability to have a good life with out asking to many questions, Very smart I might add. But that just common sense. Will the government become so corrupt that it becomes a dictatorship? It could happen . Then you wont be able to do anything and you will know what’s it like to be a Real Slave.

One thing I would bet my life on.

if 50 Million Americans said we want this and pushed and yelled and pushed and didnt back down to the lawmakers we could make a change. IF 50 million Americans did anything it would get done.

We just wont.



[edit on 13-7-2005 by ShiftTrio]



posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 12:21 PM
link   
Frosty, when have I said I was pro-Saddam? Or pro-his Government?

In fact, if you bother to check I will and have backed up the removal of him, however I dislike the lies the Government gave us, I dislike the way they handle the war and I dislike the fact there are people a lot worse than Saddam who get off free.

If you wish to Police the World, you have to apply it to all - even Nations that you yourself back.



posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 02:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Aim
Frosty, you did a poor job reading what I had to say. It's unfortunate that you blind yourself from what freedom truly is by attempting to agitate others. You live in Wonderland, a true card you are!


Freedom from loans? What are you stating? That the way the world runs you don't agree with, how else should it be done? Maybe it's time for some of you to come up and outline another way for the world to run, rather than bitch and moan about loans. Don't take out a loan if it bothers you that much. Did you also know the bank does not have to give you a loan? IF this is the system for making money, so far it has been a good system.


Aim

posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 03:06 PM
link   
Again you have to place negativity in your responses Frosty, I don't understand the point.

I would really like it if common law was re introduced, and the secrets the corporations disguising themselves as Gov't had would be revealed. Common Law is so much better then the crooked Commercial Law we have now, if you wish to see how crooked it truly is I suggest you read Alice in Wonderland.. it was written as a satire for the commercial law system.

I would love it if people would start to work in harmony with eachother, realise money does not exist. Truly what is done is not for money, it is for
everyone. Some fall short in realising that money is only there to keep you focused on helping everyone, they become consumed by their ego.

What I would love is for everyone to start working together, to stop using these backwords=forwards, right=wrong, up=down, and around laws. There is no purpose for them other then leeching from your lives efforts.

Again I highly suggest you visit the websites I posted earlier, they have tons of informative information on how you can start to change things in your life.



posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 05:38 PM
link   
It is only going to get worst and that is the truth so enjoy with what little time all of you have left because the curtin is about to be lifted and the faces of the power's that hide in the background will no longer hide and as little god's they will want to have us bow to them and be good little cattle
and do what we are told or else.Fight fight never give in



posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 05:50 PM
link   
There can be no altruicstic endevour to help one another out of pure emotional thought. How would anything be accomplished if we didn't not trade goods with one another for our very survival. Money is only one of these goods. You people are making money out to be much more than it really is. You act as if a few men in this world plant subliminal messages on the back of the dollar to keep us all brainwashed. You have no proof, no sustenance for what you are saying, all you have is motivation: your own unexpressed greed and jealousy.



posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 06:21 PM
link   
Frosty, that isn't the point.

The problem is, over time money is becoming worth-less and less, as time goes on people are finding it harder to get by. The big National corporation, use cheap labour and make millions and the Governments of the world are too scared to stand up to them.

If you value democracy, you should value what is best for the majority and that isn't what the Governments of the World are doing right now. Instead they are happy earning millions through back-room deals.


Aim

posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 06:46 PM
link   
Listen Frosty, I'm sorry I need to smack you in the face with reality but you do not even own your money. ALL you 'own' is credited to this STRAWMAN and following the Roman law of Persons and Property, which is a legal maxim that effects EVERYTHING you cannot possibly own even your money.

You say show you the subliminal messages that hold control over the planet, I say look at your very 'own' bank notes, it says right on it that it is property of the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve is not even a part of the Government, it is a private corporation owned by a select few.

The 'Government' is not even Government, it is a corporation that was created in the 1800s (or 1700s, I will look for the exact date if you ask me to). The 'US' does not equal to The United States of America.

Actually you know what, I am going to do you a favour, it is your choice if you wish to read this material.

Here is the history of your 'country', here is the history of the 'US'.


U.S. Law is Private Merchant Law, leaving the people as Surety and Debtor on the bankruptcy.

Law is contract, universally and in the U.S., so we must follow the progression of contractual agreements which constitute the underlying U.S. Law. (We cannot address all individual laws and cases or you would not have time in a life to review it, even though ignorance of the millions of laws, statutes, codes, etc… is no excuse in Private Admiralty Jurisdictions.)

In basically chronological order, the following progression of contracts, and our interpretation of them follows:

The USA, a corporation of the English Crown, is bankrupt, and has been since at least 1788. The Articles of Confederation states in Article 12: “All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed as considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged.” The “Founding Fathers,” as constitutors, acknowledged and reorganized the debt in the US Constitution 1787, Article VI, hence “constitution.” Bankruptcy occurred on January 1, 1788 based on 21 loans that the United States of America received from the King of England dating from February 28, 1778 through July 5, 1782, the repayment of which had been ratified by Congress on January 22, 1783. The United States Bank, created in 1791, was a private bank, with 18,000 of 25,000 shares owned by England.


No de jure, constitutional Congress has existed since March 27, 1861 when seven (7) Southern States walked out of Congress leaving Congress without a quorum for adjourning and therefore ending sine die. That which is called “Congress” today assembles and acts under the authority of the President acting in capacity of being Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces, under emergency war-powers rule, i.e. “law of necessity,” i.e. no law (see 12 Stat 319, which has never been repealed and exists in Title 50 USC §§ 212, 213, 215, Appendix 16, 26 CFR Chapter 1 § 303.1-6(a), and 31 CFR Chapter 5 § 500.701 Penalties).


Since the above-referenced date, March 27, 1861, Americans have been under Fascist rule via presidential executive order under the aforementioned Emergency War Powers, 12 USC 95 a, b. Every “citizen of the United States” is now “legally” established as an “enemy” via the Amendatory Act of March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, amending Trading With Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, H.R. 4960, Public Law No. 91.


December 6th, 1865, the 14th Amendment was proclaimed as ratified (even though it never properly was, see below). The 14th Amendment, which is private Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Trust Law, constitutes a constructive, cestui que trust, a public charitable trust, “PCT,” that was expressly designed to bring every corporate franchise artificial person called a “citizen of the United States” into an inseparable merging with the government until the two are united (with the power inhering in the government, not the people). A cestui que trust is fundamentally different from a regular trust, which is express in nature and consists of a contractual indenture involving three (3) parties: Grantor (Creator or Trustor), Trustee, and Beneficiaries. In an express trust, legal ownership is transferred by written contract between Grantor and Trustee in which the Grantor surrenders ownership of property to the legal person, the Trust, to be managed by the Trustee on behalf of those who are to benefit from the arrangement, the Beneficiaries. A cestui que trust, on the other hand, differs from an express trust in several crucial ways:
a. It is not formed by express contract, i.e. overt agreement expressed in writing, but by legal construction, i.e. fiat.
b. A cestui que trust has no Grantor, but, being a constructive trust created by operation of law, i.e. by make-believe, has only co-trustees and co-beneficiaries. The co-trustees are the parties with the duties for managing property for the “public good,” i.e. for the benefit of those designated as co-beneficiaries.


The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, chartered a Federal company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US Inc.,” a “Commercial Agency” originally designated as “Washington, D.C.,” in accordance with the so-called 14th Amendment, which the record indicates was never ratified (see Utah Supreme Court Cases, Dyett v Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v Phillips, (1975) 540 P 2d 936; as well as Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972; 28 Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law Quarterly 484; Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646). A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.


In conformity with the above-referenced creation of United States (1871) and the 14th Amendment, the Legislature of each State created a limited-liability corporation, chartered in a private, military, international, commercial, admiralty/maritime jurisdiction, entitled “STATE OF…” e.g. “STATE OF CALIFORNIA,” as evidenced by, inter alia, the change in the seal and the creation of a new constitution, e.g. Constitution of the State of California (1879), concerning which, re California:

a. A general partnership agreement, hereinafter “General Partnership,” exists between the California Republic (1849), and STATE OF CALIFORNIA (1879), with STATE OF CALIFORNIA acting as governmental controller.

b. STATE OF CALIFORNIA now acts as an agent/instrumentality of United States, collecting whole life insurance premiums, known as “taxes,” for the International Monetary Fund, based, inter alia, upon the Limited Liability Act of 1851 and the bankruptcy of United States of 1933, see House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933; Public Law 73-10; Perry v. U.S. (1935), 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 L Ed 912; 31 USC 5112, 5119.


Inasmuch as all law is contract, the contract involved in a constructive trust is an implied contract. An implied contract can be ratified by two (2) means:

a. Acquiescence by silence, i.e. the “government” asserts its intentions concerning your life, rights, and property and you assent, don’t rebut, and compliantly go along with what they claim. In 1871 the Government changed the nature of its contract with the people from law as defined by the original Constitution of 1787 that recognizes law (common law), admiralty (on the sea only), and equity (functioning by voluntary contract between all participating parties), and began relating to people as if they were “citizens of the Unites States” within/under the private, commercial, international, military jurisdiction of the new de facto corporation, i.e. US Inc. They offered people a “new deal,” and almost everyone bought it (based on naïve and foolish trust and assuming that everything was OK).
The people were thereby denied access to law and placed on the ship of state of US Inc. where the captain’s word is law and no one has any rights. As Jefferson phrased the matter, “As government grows, liberty recedes.”

b. You expressly accept “benefits” offered by the government, and thereby finalize the contract by deed. This is similar to finalizing a contract with a restaurant by sitting down at a table, reading a menu, and then ordering and consuming a meal. By your deeds you affirm to the restaurant that you will pay for the meal in accordance with the price stated on the menu. No written contract is signed, but a contract is formed nevertheless.


By the above two (2) means people give implied assent that they are bound by an alleged contract with US Inc. in accordance with the terms and conditions that inhere in being treated as a “citizen of the United States” under the 14th Amendment, and are therefore placed into permanent legal status as a Debtor and Surety for U.S. Inc.. In such a position people leave the ground of sovereignty and all capacity for asserting their unalienable rights in favor of being presumed as having exercised their sovereignty and free-will autonomy for the purpose of going along with the government’s assertion that they sacrifice everything for the “public good,” i.e. the PCT. By so doing people lose their standing in law, i.e. they “die a civil death in the law.” They are placed in the legal position of mortmain (i.e. as if deceased) and are shorn of capacity for asserting their rights, since the presumption is that they have already exercised those rights for the purpose of being placed in the position they are in, i.e. property of the government with a lien against you and everything your life labor could ever create, including your children. The private being (the real individual) is sacrificed for the good of the public (the imaginary collective).


When people die such a civil death in the law they are like ghosts, and thereby incapable of managing their own affairs and enjoying their unalienable rights. Like the estate of a decedent, they are then managed by the executors/administrators of the estate, in probate. Such is the condition of every “citizen of the United States” today in law, managed by the government agencies acting as executors/administrators of their estates in bankruptcy, legal incapacity, and civil death as assets of the bankrupt US. The US is property of the private Real Parties of Interest, the Creditors in bankruptcy.


The 14th Amendment was allegedly established for the purpose of creating a citizenship for the liberated blacks, and other disenfranchised people, who otherwise had no citizenship because they could not comply with the requirements for state citizenship. What actually happened was that the blacks were taken off of the Southern slave plantations and placed into the slave plantation of US Inc., a far worse lot. The government then gradually absorbed everyone else—including state citizens—into the same condition.


1871-1913. Officers of the actual government held office in dual capacity, i.e. in both USA and US Inc. status.


1912. Bonds issued by US Inc. came due but US Inc. did not have the resources for paying their creditors (the seven families that founded the Federal Reserve Bank), so US Inc.’s owner (the actual government) was required to pay the balance. The national government was also without sufficient funds to meet US Inc.’s obligations, so the creditors settled for all of the assets of both US Inc. and the national government instead of foreclosure on and liquidation of the entire country. By so doing they expropriated the nation—both USA and US Inc. Sic transit America.


1912. US Inc. forms an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank (It is important to note that both of these entities are private corporations which removes the general allegations of treason or fraud from this relationship). Through this agreement US Inc. must function in debt, even though they have neither funds nor resources for financing their operation.


1912. The first corporate only Senators are seated in the next election year by popular vote of the US Inc. registered voters. The original-jurisdiction national Senators of the States did not assume office that year and at least one third of the nation’s Senators seats were lawfully and voluntarily vacant.



February 3rd, 1913. US Inc. passes its 16th Amendment and Congress orders the Secretary of State to enter it as ratified even though the States had not ratified it according to Law. The Secretary complied. It should be noted that this would not have been lawful if it were a national Constitution amendment, however it was perfectly legal within the colorable, de facto corporation. It should also be noted that where the national Constitution already had a 16th amendment and where the Supreme Court says that the new 16th Amendment did not do anything, this corporate amendment must simply be a space filler entered such that US Inc.’s Constitution (1871) would have the same number of amendments as that of the national Constitution (1787).


April 8th, 1913. US Inc. passes its 17th amendment and Congress orders it to be entered as ratified in the exact same manner as they did with US Inc.’s 16th Amendment. This amendment changes where US Inc.’s Senators are elected. This amendment is not even lawfully possible as a national Constitution amendment for several reasons, not the least of which is that the amendment would have required that Congress first pass an amendment that stated that they had the power to say where Senators are elected before they could even deliberate on such a subject matter, after which they would then have to have competent ratifications performed on such amendments in accord with constitutional limits, not as was done with US Inc.’s 16th Amendment.


December 23, 1913. The Congress, late at night with only a small cadre of supporters present, passed the Federal Reserve Act, surrendering the creation and management of the nation’s currency into the hands of a cartel of private—and mostly foreign—bankers. Currency is the single most essential and critical commodity in the world, embodying more law and principles of commerce than any other. Since all interactions are “commerce,” and the medium of doing business in commerce is currency, money is in a very significant sense the measure of all things. By abandoning control and management of the money supply the nation surrendered all capacity for claiming sovereignty. The government lost its independent treasury (one of the requirements in law for national sovereignty). The United States Government became a mere fiefdom, or administrative arm, of the bankers, who now owned the store.

Passage of the Federal Reserve Act was a major milestone on the “road to serfdom” that this entire progression outlines. The conspiratorial nature of matters is exemplified in comments by one of the major actors in the triumph of the Federal Reserve, Edward Mandell House, who had this to say in a private meeting with President Woodrow Wilson:

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will effect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.


Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”



1917. Corporate-only Senators begin participating in all matters with those Senators who still had original jurisdiction government capacity, as a result of which all activities of the government were performed in corporate capacity only.


1917. President Wilson was re-elected by the Electoral College, but only US Inc.’s Senate performed the Senate confirmation necessary for seating the national President. There was no national government Senate confirmation; no national seats were seated and all remained vacant. Note: the national President is also the Military’s Commander in Chief, and under the nation’s status of being ruled by the private, commercial, martial-law rule of the Bankers and English Crown, the business needs of the nation have remained under US Inc. control since 1871, i.e. ever since US Inc. was incorporated and made operational over such matters.


1917-1944. All national government seats are and remain vacant, and US Inc. continues maintaining the business needs of the government under martial-law rule.


June 5, 1933. US Inc. declares bankruptcy under House Joint Resolution, “HJR,” 192.


1935. The Social Security Act is passed.


On application, the new Social Security Administration (hereinafter “SSA”) creates a private Trust with a trust name that sounds like the name of the applicant except the Trust’s name is spelled with all capital letters. SSA makes the applicant a co-trustee of the namesake Trust, designates the SSA General Trust Fund as the Beneficiary of the namesake trust, and assigns the Trust a Social Security General Trust Fund Account number re the applicant for accounting and identification purposes.


1938. In Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, 1938, 304 U.S. 64-92, the U.S. Supreme Court sets the presumption re the status and capacity of an individual as that of General Capacity/General Partnership relationship with the namesake Trust, as if the two (2) entities—individual and namesake Trust—were one-in-the-same person.


1944. In the Bretton Woods Agreement US Inc. is quit-claimed into the newly formed International Monetary Fund (hereinafter “IMF”) in exchange for the power allowing US Inc.’s President the right of naming (seating and controlling) the governors and general managers of the International Monetary Fund, The World Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter-American Bank also formed in that agreement (codified at United States Code Title 22 § 286). It must be noted that this act created an unlawful conflict of interest between US Inc. (with its new foreign owner) and its purpose of carrying out the business needs of the national government. This is the cause of our use of the term “original-jurisdiction” government. With the new foreign owner of US Inc. a conflict of interest is created between the national government and US Inc., even though the contracted purpose of US Inc. has not changed on its face.


1962. At the National Governor’s Conference in Lexington, Kentucky, US Inc. informs the governors, under the guise of “public necessity”, that they must all form, or reform existing, private corporations under US Inc. (in their state’s interest), so that the people will not discover what the state governments are doing with the people’s money (dabbling in foreign notes, i.e. Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs), bonds, and evidences of debt), which activity is forbidden from State governments by their own State Constitutions, which information would likely cause a people’s revolt ending in the State official’s being at worst killed and at least replaced. The proposed incorporation deadline was 1968.


1970. By this time each State revised its constitution and statutes and formed private corporate entities of the name “STATE OF (X)” (where “(X)” is representative of the common State name), and then vacated their original jurisdiction government seats in favor of foreign ownership and control under the mandate of US Inc.


It appears that this was all done so a General Partnership could be presumed as existing between “The State” (of the national Union of States) and “STATE OF (X)”, a private corporation. Said STATE OF (X), as General Partner, then assumes the role of governmental operator/controller. This scenario is further proven by the fact that these corporate entities cannot handle gold and silver coin of the United States of America in commercial transactions without violating the Par Value Modifications Act and the Foreign Currency Exchange Act.


April 19th, 1994. Federal agents attack, burn, and raze the compound, killing approximately 100 of the members of the sect, without any lawful cause for the action.


50 USC 1520 et seq. demonstrates that there exists an agenda for using Americans (Sovereign and otherwise) as biological test subjects. This is a fundamental breach of an alleged Constitutional contract.


President Clinton pushes for a mandatory health care bill for the purpose of placing the physical bodies of all Americans under control of US Inc., with international identification attached, for the purpose of tagging the populace, as per the Biblical prophesy of the Mark of the Beast. The computer that would handle the tracking is even identified with the acronym: B.E.A.S.T.

What the above progression depicts is the systematic growth of the power, scope, and pervasive control of Government exercised against the American people by foreign, criminal, and hostile powers. This same dreary gestalt constitutes the nature of man’s history on this planet as far back as the eye can see. Civilizations rise, fall, and disappear, replaced by new ones that—based upon being founded on, and functioning in accordance with, wrong principles—are foredoomed for extinction, as were all of their predecessors and as all future civilizations will be until mankind finally learns and ceases “beating a dead horse” by structuring law, commerce, religion, and social organization in general on principles that are existentially impossible.

The above progression has proceeded in America by implementing such strategy as:

1. Relentlessly instilling in people the foundational idea that governments in general are absolutely essential in the society of man and that the Government in America is the people’s friend and servant, i.e. a “government of the people, by the people, and for the people.” These premises are untrue—self-serving cons by those who want the power.

2. Creating governmentally owned corporate franchises, such as a “citizen of the United States” and one’s all-capital-letter name, with which people are deceived into identifying.

3. Regarding every citizen of the United States as contractually being:
a. A corporate citizen, i.e. a corporate franchise;

b. A co-trustee (with duties) and co-beneficiary (with privileges) of the 14th Amendment Public Charitable cestui que Trust;

c. Pledged as an asset in the bankruptcy of US Inc., and therefore a co-surety for the debts of US Inc.;
d. An enemy of the Creditors;

e. Chattel property of the Bankers and Power Elite;

f. A slave with no capacity for asserting any rights, no standing in law, and no capacity for contracting.
4. Functioning on the presumption that the individual being, with autonomy and free will, knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily contracted into the situation of being united—like heads and tails of a coin—with a corporate entity created and owned by the Government.

As per the established maxim of law, “As a thing is bound, so it is unbound,” the way out of the problem is within and through the problem. This is accomplished by understanding what the problem is, i.e. its structure and character, just as solving the problem of a plugged drain is accomplished by realizing that the problem is the plugged drain, whereby the solution consists of unplugging the drain. “Know the truth and the truth shall make you free.”

The United States Library of Congress now has between 2,000,000 and 3,000,000 books on law. Any law library is a daunting place, possessing row after row of shelves with books full of fine print. Making knowledge of such “law” even more unattainable is not only that what passes for law today perpetually changes, altered by every new court case/opinion, legislative enactment, and all of the ever-changing policies, rules, and regulations of administrative agencies, but an immense amount of the world’s law today, as actually implemented, is unwritten and inaccessible.

This is not only because judges operate in general equity in which the ultimate arbiter of a matter is the “conscience of the court” (i.e. how the judge feels about something that day), but because almost all of the world’s law is the private Law Merchant of the Creditors in bankruptcy of the world’s nations, essentially all of which are insolvent and in receivership to the Bankers.[3] This private Law Merchant is of ancient origin, and is implemented today by men whose identities are unknown to the mass of mankind.

In the face of this undependability of law we may ask some fundamental and ingenuous questions:

1. Is there such a thing as genuine law that is timeless, stable, and dependable?

2. If so, can such universal law be effectively invoked and utilized in practice today? How can I use it to ensure my inalienable sovereign birth rights to life and happiness?

3. If genuine law exists, why is it not taught and uniformly utilized instead of the chaotic and colorable charade that dominates the legal field today?

4. Can we integrate said universal law with the ephemeral, desultory “law” that now enslaves the overwhelming majority of people on this planet?


www.wealth4freedom.com...

[edit on 13-7-2005 by Aim]

[edit on 13-7-2005 by Aim]



posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 07:54 PM
link   
My money is electronic. I have no bank notes.
Sure, the bank does, but the Fed is losing power ever year more and more switch to doing business electronically.

Don't insult my intelimegency, I know what the Federal Reserve is. I aced every history class I had in highschool and slept through economics with an A as well. Though government class was a little different. You know why The Fed is owned by a select few? The same reason other companies are owned and run by a select few. Tough cookies. Don't like bank notes, switch to gold. You wouldn't be alone in buying gold assests.

Why not fight fire with fire? I estimate there are 100 people on these forums just like you. If you could find someone with the skills and collect funds of $100 from everyone of these people everymonth and invest right in fed notes, etc, you could try and topple the Fed, though I am doubtfull...theys got over $9 billion in gold.

Fight fire with fire, and stop complaining and begging.



posted on Jul, 13 2005 @ 08:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Frosty
Don't insult my intelimegency, I know what the Federal Reserve is. I aced every history class I had in highschool and slept through economics with an A as well.


An American degree is "worthless" and by your post you only have a HighSchool qualification? Which is what we earn at 16 in the United Kingdom.


For example, I had an offer to go to American and attend one of your Colleges/Universities to get my law degree, after I looked into it with such a degree I could only work in America - with the present one I am working towards, I will be able to in any Nation that uses the Common Law system.

My second option was as a History teacher, same goes. With an American History degree I can't teach in the U.K. yet with an English/Welsh one, I can teach in most of the World.


Also if this is the case, why did you claim Native Americans were uneducated? That shows a lack of historical knowledge. Several of your posts actually show a lack of such knowledge. Or don't you touch this area of History?



new topics

top topics



 
1
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join