It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

M14: Back 2 Waste The M16 and M4:

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2005 @ 04:43 AM
link   
Out of hate of the .22, I've been searching 4 some more M14 info a few weeks ago, and found these:

troyind.com...

www.ukasc.net...

www.ukasc.net...

www.specwargear.com...

www.specwargear.com...

If it can b equiped with a nade launcher, it kills the M4 SOPMOD.

This is A LOT better.

This has been out 4 a long while now, and I'm glad:


[edit on 29-6-2005 by SEAL Trident]




posted on Jun, 29 2005 @ 06:21 AM
link   
Yeah this is much better. I so prefer battle rifles over assault rifles.



posted on Jun, 29 2005 @ 01:03 PM
link   
it looks a little like the an-94


M6D

posted on Jun, 29 2005 @ 02:16 PM
link   
out of curiosity, why do they state what looks like an normal 20 rounder mag is a 130?



posted on Jun, 29 2005 @ 02:25 PM
link   
!!! I didn't get that either:

1. It's a new type of rd:


2. or it's a glitch or typo.


I thought it was just me 2 a point. That was sad: 130 rd mag in that small of a thing.
We wish.



posted on Jun, 29 2005 @ 03:35 PM
link   
nice gun any comparison charts for M14 with the M16 n M4???



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 06:01 AM
link   
It's smaller, better range, and more accuracy than the M4 and M16, but I'm not sure how much more reliable and lighter, if it is, that the M16 or M4. Like I said, it's back 2 waste the M16 and M4.

Ahh, revenge is sweat, isn't M14 SOPMOD.
!!!



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 09:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by M6D
out of curiosity, why do they state what looks like an normal 20 rounder mag is a 130?


Because the picture shows a wannabe airsoft gun.



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 10:15 AM
link   
Really.......

Oh crap.

Sry bout that.



lol, that sucked.


M6D

posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 11:16 AM
link   
Awww damn!
can somebody perhaps tell me if its theres a real M14 SOPMOD and not some airsoft crap?



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:01 PM
link   
it's just the ukasc links, the other 3 r real. Besides, 4 the 1st 1, I doubt a airsoft silencer costs $900+.



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:07 PM
link   
My dad frequently mentioned his disdain of the M-1 Garand he was issued in the Pacific, favoring the '03 Springfield on which he'd trained. A crack shot with most weapons, my Dad swore by the Springfield alone.



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:08 PM
link   
Sry bout b4, so here r some other REAL M14 SOPMOD Pics:

www.defensereview.com...

www.securityarms.com...

troyind.com...

www.depot53.com...

www.gun-world.net...

[edit on 1-7-2005 by SEAL Trident]



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by periwinkle blue
My dad frequently mentioned his disdain of the M-1 Garand he was issued in the Pacific, favoring the '03 Springfield on which he'd trained. A crack shot with most weapons, my Dad swore by the Springfield alone.


A3-03 Springfields are nice game guns. Nowadays people just don't like the bolt action guns. Everybody wants full auto waste a ton of ammo guns. The 03 signifies 1903 the date the gun was adopted by the army. 03 Springfields and 98 Mausers are great, vintage, and accurate guns. Plus there are modern barrels available so when your barrel is shot out, you can screw if off and screw on a brand new one.



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:25 PM
link   
Wow, those are not the M14's that I remember from the Vietnam era!!!


M6D

posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:28 PM
link   
M14 well always be a very sexy gun, is the SOPMOD just as accurate as the origonal M14?



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by groingrinder
Wow, those are not the M14's that I remember from the Vietnam era!!!


welcome to the 21st century my friend.
things have changed since the M14 was used during Vietnam war, people stil use the M14, they have the specialized version for sniping called M21.



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:35 PM
link   
I see they eliminated one of the drawbacks of the original M14, that was the non-linear buttstock. That increased the tendency to wander upwards when using automatic fire. The newer model now has a straight stock, just as nearly all other contemporary automatic fire weapons have.

But now it seems to be rather unergonomic to aim using the normal ironsights, since they are too low now.



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:46 PM
link   
Well, i like the m-4 better...


M6D

posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 02:11 PM
link   
Aye, i know that, i kinda meant a regular M14 SOPMOD, i wasnt referring to things like the M21 nad M25, not to mention the M14 national match.




top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join