It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by C0le
Some of you anti-war people seriously loose any credibility you could have on your stance when you say things such as,
1.I hope hes assassinated.
2.Any thing regarding Nazis or the Schutzstaffel.
3.Oil War.
If you can make a case without that childish uninformed, unproven bs, name calling, putdowns ect, we conserves might actualy listen to what you have to say.
[edit on 29-6-2005 by C0le]
Originally posted by C0le
Some of you anti-war people seriously loose any credibility you could have on your stance when you say things such as,
1.I hope hes assassinated.
2.Any thing regarding Nazis or the Schutzstaffel.
3.Oil War.
If you can make a case without that childish uninformed, unproven bs, name calling, putdowns ect, we conserves might actualy listen to what you have to say.
[edit on 29-6-2005 by C0le]
Originally posted by WeBDeviL
Actually, it is a little known fact that WMDs and/or the materials needed for making such weapons WERE found in Iraq.
Hmm? Did you know that?
I read awhile back that in December, 2003, British and Dutch troops did infact come upon shells filled with mustard gas.
It is a fact that Saddam Hussein had WMD. The question is 'where did he transfer them to?'
Another country? Most likely.
Originally posted by C0le
As far as WMD's are concerned, devil, you atleast gotta be open to the possibility that there are large caches in Iraq that we havent found, heck look back at the large underground bunker they found a month or so ago.
Stuff like this cant realy be debated on "yet"
Heck remember at the beggining of the war we found, planes, burried under the sand, not in shelters or anything, but just covered with sand,
www.newsmax.com...
www.newsmax.com...
www.newsmax.com...
www.newsmax.com...
How do you know they didnt bury the weapons also?
Originally posted by Britguy
Do a bit of research Astroblade.
The CIA were unusually cautious over any intelligence that they provided to the White House, stressing it was old and that they had no up-to-date information. The CIA was also bypassed by the creation of the "Office Of Special Plans" set up within the Pentagon that had a direct reporting line to the White House. The sole purpose of this unit was to provide the "intelligence" needed to support war. This information went straight to the White House without oversight and has been discredited since due to it's sources.
Then we had the report supplied to the UN by Iraq on the weapons issue. That report was "censored" by the US before anyone else at the UN got to see it. Thousands of pages were missing from the submitted report and many others had been blanked out in whole or in part. The US had no right to do that but again, nobody questioned it.
Then there was the alleged link to 9/11. The 9/11 commission in their report debunked this too.
Terrorism? There was no terrorism or fundies operating or sheltered by Iraq before this war, they'd have been a threat to Saddam and their presence would not have been tolerated.
There is no question that we were lied to. No amount of spin or legalistic doubletalk can justify the lies. It's not conspiracy theory, it's fact.