So you are saying only one human just spawned another human? You asy that I need to back up my evidence, even though you have no evidence to support
your theory that animals spawned themselves. You can be a stubborn atheist, you can say I have no proof, whatever. If you stopped for 2 seconds and
actually thought about what I have said, you would get it. You know, it takes the same amount of faith, if not more, to believe that there was a big
bang or any other scientific theory. The big bang is an excuse to say that everything did not come from nothing. I did not say I believed that the
earth is 6000 years old. Im not going to be talking about "evidence" or "proof." because I'd be as bad as you are, saying "you have no proof"
even though you don't have any more than I do.
There is evidence for the young earth theory though. Go to this page:
Answers in Genesis
Here is some evidence:
"
Galaxies wind themselves up too fast
The stars of our own galaxy, the Milky Way, rotate about the galactic center with different speeds, the inner ones rotating faster than the outer
ones. The observed rotation speeds are so fast that if our galaxy were more than a few hundred million years old, it would be a featureless disc of
stars instead of its present spiral shape.1
Yet our galaxy is supposed to be at least 10 billion years old. Evolutionists call this ‘the winding-up dilemma’, which they have known about for
fifty years. They have devised many theories to try to explain it, each one failing after a brief period of popularity. The same ‘winding-up’
dilemma also applies to other galaxies.
For the last few decades the favored attempt to resolve the dilemma has been a complex theory called ‘density waves’.1 The theory has conceptual
problems, has to be arbitrarily and very finely tuned, and lately has been called into serious question by the Hubble Space Telescope’s discovery of
very detailed spiral structure in the central hub of the ‘Whirlpool’ galaxy, M51.2
2. Comets disintegrate too quickly
According to evolutionary theory, comets are supposed to be the same age as the solar system, about 5 billion years. Yet each time a comet orbits
close to the sun, it loses so much of its material that it could not survive much longer than about 100,000 years. Many comets have typical ages of
10,000 years.3
Evolutionists explain this discrepancy by assuming that (a) comets come from an unobserved spherical ‘Oort cloud’ well beyond the orbit of Pluto,
(b) improbable gravitational interactions with infrequently passing stars often knock comets into the solar system, and (c) other improbable
interactions with planets slow down the incoming comets often enough to account for the hundreds of comets observed.4 So far, none of these
assumptions has been substantiated either by observations or realistic calculations.
Lately, there has been much talk of the ‘Kuiper Belt’, a disc of supposed comet sources lying in the plane of the solar system just outside the
orbit of Pluto. Even if some bodies of ice exist in that location, they would not really solve the evolutionists’ problem, since according to
evolutionary theory the Kuiper Belt would quickly become exhausted if there were no Oort cloud to supply it. [For more information, see the detailed
technical article Comets and the Age of the Solar System.]"
No evidence huh?
5aret
