Not all dictatorships are bad though. While studying Stalin in history, my teacher said that Brunei was under a dictatorship but wasn't brutal or run
down.
The Sultan is advised by several councils and a cabinet of ministers although he is effectively the supreme ruler. The media is extremely
pro-government and the Royal family retains an almost godlike status within the country. There is no elected legislative body. The country has been
under hypothetical martial law since a rebellion occurred in the early 1960s and was put down by British troops from Singapore. A battalion from the
British Army's Royal Gurkha Rifles is still stationed in Brunei under agreement with the Sultan to protect the oil fields in the West of the country.
Other units from the British Army are present to support and train the Brunei Army

It seems that Brunei is quite a stable country, even with a dictatorship.
The main problem with the NWO is us. Because most of us (if not all) have been brought up during the Cold War and post cold war, we see most wars
being fought against the evils of dictatorships. Be it fascist or communist, we believe that it's wrong. Not just because of the media but also our
parents opinions, other peoples and teaching at school. Take Germany in the 1930s for example. We may think it's evil, and don't understand how the
German people could've been lured into something, but it did happen bit by bit. Everyone was indoctrinated, from youth to parents so they would fight
for Germany in the Waffen-SS to purify their race. The reason I mention this is because they believed it was right, while we believe it's morally
wrong, to purify Germany and the Aryan race they did the correct thing (although brutally awful).
Now suppose the NWO came into power, like the UN, and started all nice and doing good, and either kept it that way by uniting the world, but there's
still a 50-50 chance of the NWO being a dreded boogeyman.
All I'm trying to say is that the NWO might be a good thing, associated with a bad thing.