This topic is in the New World Order discussion forum.  (rss)


NWO: Lets be serious here....


<<  2    3    4    5  >>



reply posted on 5-12-2005 @ 12:26 PM by billybob


a global (communist/capitalist is moot, because it will be neither. it will be slavery) fascist state. a cashless society. either one or NO religion 'allowed'. gps tracking of everyone. directly controlled population growth/reduction. guilty until proven innocent. reeducation and extermination for troublemakers(people like me).

think of that eye atop the pyramid as being 'skynet', and the pyramid(obviously) is the heirarchal power structure built of people, not block.

'the needs of the many outwieghs the needs of the one'. (lip sevice only, 'they' will be immune to the police state and it's 'laws'.)

one need only look at katrina to see the nwo in action. fema is the nwo in waiting for america. you americans have let president after president sign over TOTAL AUTHORITY to fema in the event of a 'national emergency', and it is quite obvious from watching fema's actions and the way they spend their money, that they are only interested in power, and not philanthropy.

right now, the world 'leaders'(i put that in brackets, because, thank GOD there are ground-up effects, and not just top-down effects) are all two-faced(perhaps, 3 or 4 faced, even, .....they are politicians, afterall) showing the face of concern about the development of (x) country, when in fact, the only way to get your country wedged nicely into the world economy, is to PLAY BALL with the bankers(the layer just below the all-seeing eye).

money is not power in a cashless society. power becomes a matter of consensus, and 'consensus' will be TAKEN by those who implement the changover from cash to credit.

a central database will be the 'real' ruler. erasing a life will be as easy as calling up a profile and hitting delete.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-12-2005 @ 12:44 PM by jenkwater

...



So it seem to me that just about everything you don't like -- whether it's a capitalist society, an islamofascist state, or anything which has one group of undetermined people which have stuff and you and others which don't -- is "NWO".



As long as the people who 'have' don't interfere with me or the world with their 'stuff'. If these stuff havers were not in power and not meddling with the masses I would not care about them boning gay pornstars at bohemian grove. But they are, and I do.

it's the equivelant of getting stuffed in a locker by a bully, we are encouraged to stand up to it when we are young. Experience and maturity should dictate we not back down from corrupt leadership pushing us around.




What's the difference between your "NWO" and the way things are now?



once it's global there will be no way to stop it.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-12-2005 @ 03:02 PM by mashup


Not all dictatorships are bad though. While studying Stalin in history, my teacher said that Brunei was under a dictatorship but wasn't brutal or run down.



The Sultan is advised by several councils and a cabinet of ministers although he is effectively the supreme ruler. The media is extremely pro-government and the Royal family retains an almost godlike status within the country. There is no elected legislative body. The country has been under hypothetical martial law since a rebellion occurred in the early 1960s and was put down by British troops from Singapore. A battalion from the British Army's Royal Gurkha Rifles is still stationed in Brunei under agreement with the Sultan to protect the oil fields in the West of the country. Other units from the British Army are present to support and train the Brunei Army



It seems that Brunei is quite a stable country, even with a dictatorship.
The main problem with the NWO is us. Because most of us (if not all) have been brought up during the Cold War and post cold war, we see most wars being fought against the evils of dictatorships. Be it fascist or communist, we believe that it's wrong. Not just because of the media but also our parents opinions, other peoples and teaching at school. Take Germany in the 1930s for example. We may think it's evil, and don't understand how the German people could've been lured into something, but it did happen bit by bit. Everyone was indoctrinated, from youth to parents so they would fight for Germany in the Waffen-SS to purify their race. The reason I mention this is because they believed it was right, while we believe it's morally wrong, to purify Germany and the Aryan race they did the correct thing (although brutally awful).

Now suppose the NWO came into power, like the UN, and started all nice and doing good, and either kept it that way by uniting the world, but there's still a 50-50 chance of the NWO being a dreded boogeyman.


All I'm trying to say is that the NWO might be a good thing, associated with a bad thing.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-12-2005 @ 03:49 PM by syrinx high priest


I'm sure this isn't original or new to this thread, but I think the days of nations are over, the era of corporations has begun.

Tha manchurian candidate is now the halliburton candidate.

I believe in global elitist cronysism, power corrupts, and international bankers are in control of almost everything

I draw the line at satanic connections, or an elaborate scheme spanning generations and continents



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  2    3    4    5  >>










ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , , ,
















ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.075 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread