It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
hey waynos how goes it. well personally i love number1 the look of the a400. also i like the thinking of the us buying this in return for the f-35 support but i would say it wouldn't be in overly large numbers. also to add my own little hopes. this would be a sweet replacement for the ageing (even faster aging) of the canadian C-130's. what do you think about the chances of that waynos? i'd be interested in your openion. regards Can_EH
Originally posted by Canada_EH
agreed agreed agreed your nailin this subject waynos but i dont know about can we have had to fight so hard to get our freakin gov to do anything for the forces. in the past 5 years thigns have leveled out with them cutting big bucks from the military but they got a long way to go before they start properly fixing things spending wise. as for the lockheed build it seems likely that they would try to do something like that. so also wondering what would be the most likely role of the a400 the brits and usa have the C-17's. would it be more of a complementing role to the 17? any ideas?
Originally posted by waynos
Whats the general opinion on this board then, does the US really need to be making stealthy transports or might the transatlantic alliance be better served (and billions of dollars better spent) by the US buying into the A400 in return for our continued support of the F-35? Enjoy the piccies and then let rip guys!
"The A330 Tanker offers a state-of-the-art platform and refueling system clearly exceeding the performances of competitors' alternatives,” said Rafael Acedo, Vice President Programs EADS Military Transport Aircraft Division.
The Air Force has a requirement for several hundred aerial tankers to assure its in-flight refueling mission for U.S. forces worldwide, and EADS is committed to be a viable competitor in this important program.
Originally posted by waynos
Oh, a third thing occurs, I wasn't promoting the A400 as 'compensation' as you put it, merely as an opportunity for a trade offset deal, as these things are quite common in international deals, eg when the RAF bought the Sentry AEW.1 the USA placed contracts worth 100% of the AWACS deal with UK companies, thats the sort of thing I'm advocating.