It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The first as you mentioned, credibility of the witnesses.
Starting out a new disclosure project with a different more credible approach would be interesting. I could be wrong in that even with a better presentation, they would not succeed, but more supporters may take them seriously.
Originally posted by Musclor
I have to remember you that amongst the witnesses, we have people who were witnesses of ufo events such as Bentwaters 1980, Japan Airlines 1986, Malmstrom AFB 1966, just to name a few. Others may be less known but they are as solid as the others.
The Disclosure Project cannot do differently than what it did, simply cause truth is truth. You can't alter or make things "lighter" just to make them more acceptable by people.
Originally posted by Viendin
It all comes down to the question of which is more impressive:
Case A: Prvt. John Adamson "Sure I drank a lot, but the thing is, I saw it and its recorded on the radar - there has to be something there!"
Case B: John Callahan "At the time I was the Director of the FAA, and let me assure you, I'm certain something was there, and the CIA had me cover it up."
Cause, I'd go with B to tell the public.
Originally posted by feyd rautha
Friedmann supported Billy Meier? would somemeone please provide me a link to proof this statement?