It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Wow, talk about rewriting history. Japan was after raw materials that they didn't have in their own country. They were trying to become a major power and needed materials to build up their military/civilian industries. And how does what they did to people in China count as liberating them? You don't drop chemical/biological weapons on people you're trying to liberate, unless you want to kill them and move more people into that area. And we won't even go into what they did to POWs. Bataan Death March? what? And they CERTAINLY weren't out to liberate Hawaii. The only reason they even bothered with Pearl Harbor was to eliminate the Pacific Fleet.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Except the huge difference between Japan and the US is that Japan was doing it to take over resources, and occupy those countries, where as 99% of the military actions the US has taken were to protect people from genocide, or invasion. I'm not suggesting that all the military actions were for purely altruistic motives, because we all know they weren't, but they weren't for world conquest, and we didn't drop chem/bio weapons on anyone, or perform surgery just to replace parts of a human body to see what would happen.
Originally posted by AceOfBaseThe Japanese were just trying to liberate the Asian countries that had fallen to western nations.
The 'Asia for Asians' policy was all about 'liberation' and of course security for their own nation. Right?
They should have allowed to liberate nations just like the US.
If what Japan did seems wrong,
then it must also be wrong for the US when they bombed and occupied those same nations and many more.
Originally posted by Nygdan Iraq is not a province of America. Neither are germany and japan today.
Originally posted by Interseptor
And another thing American Politics in my opinion has messed with about every country in the world, By means of attack/war or by political means such as banning that countries trade with any other country.
Originally posted by elevatedone
Originally posted by Interseptor
And another thing American Politics in my opinion has messed with about every country in the world, By means of attack/war or by political means such as banning that countries trade with any other country.
How many countries are there ... 191 or 193 according to your source ?
so show me how the U.S. has messed with MOST of them ?
you can't because we didn't.
Originally posted by Zaphod58 , but what resources did Kosovo have? Or Somalia? Or Grenada? We already had helped put Hussein into power in Iraq, so we could have just made a deal with him and let him keep Kuwait instead of going in and liberating it.
\
Originally posted by AceOfBase
Kosovo:
Strategic access to Caspian Oil?
Newsmax: Pipeline Politics
Billions worth of lead, zinc, cadmium, silver and gold? antiwar
Grenada:
Nutmeg?
reagan.utexas.edu
Plus it was in the US shpere of influence and they didn't want any commies over there.
Originally posted by skippytjc
Hate pharm thread, move it or close it up.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Oh, and just for the record, we didn't "bomb" Somalia, Grenada, Haiti or in the Koren Tree Cutting Incident. There were airstrikes READY for the Tree Cutting Incident, but they weren't used, I believe. Bombing occurs when aircraft drop explosive devices causing an explosion on the ground, damaging structures or killing people.
PBS
July 12 1993
Abdi house attack
In a major escalation, American Cobra helicopters attack a house in south Mogadishu where a group of clan leaders are meeting, destroying the building with TOW missiles and cannon fire and killing a number of Somalis. Four western journalists who had gone to investigate are beaten to death by an angry mob.
dtic.mil
On 25 October, Navy A-7 Corsairs mistakenly bombed a mental
hospital near the Grenadian command post at Fort Frederick. Two
days later, an Air-Naval Gunfire Liaison Company (ANGLICO)
lacking Army communications-electronics operating instructions
(CEOI) failed to coordinate an attack on a sniper target near
Frequente with the fire support element of the 82d Airborne
Division. This time, the Corsairs attacked a brigade
headquarters of the 82d Airborne Division, wounding seventeen
soldiers, three seriously.12