black eagle russias main tank???, page 1

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times

Topic started on 26-6-2005 @ 12:45 PM by russiankid

ive heard the the black eagle is russias main tank... is that true??? ive also heard that the black eagle was from 1997.... is that also true??? and if u konw about any other new russian tanks that r going to come out any time then just post pictures links or any other information.... thanks

files.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 26-6-2005 by russiankid]

[edit on 26-6-2005 by russiankid]

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 01:16 PM by tomcat ha

Black eagle is still in test phase i thought. So i dont think its the mbt yet.

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 01:20 PM by russiankid

they are testing something that was made in 97? well anyway thanx for ur post

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 01:33 PM by Winchester Ranger T

That's one impressive looking tank.

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 03:56 PM by Interseptor

Russian Black Eagle

could be some kind of tech deal with Russia and Israel both tanks look nearly the same. The Turat is exacly the same on both Tanks.

Well this looks like a another Israeli tech transfer to a foriegn country Russia both tanks look quite similar to each other this is just a theory.
If you look at the turat of both tanks they are exacly the same.

[edit on 26-6-2005 by Interseptor]

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 07:40 PM by russiankid

eh slight diference... well anyway is it really from 1997???

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 07:44 PM by ulshadow

here is a 3D look at the Black Eagle MBT.

yet Black Eagle 3D
Very cool!

It's my favor tank... in looks

lol, since it is not battle proven yet

[edit on 26-6-2005 by ulshadow]

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 07:52 PM by Seekerof

Erm, anyone....full-scale production of this mythical beast is to happen or take place when?

Thank you.

seekerof

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 07:56 PM by ulshadow

Originally posted by Seekerof
Erm, anyone....full-scale production of this mythical beast is to happen or take place when?

i don't think it is going into full scale production, it is just a russian exprienmental tank... russia don't have the funds to go into frull scale production.

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 07:59 PM by Seekerof

I thought and knew so.
Simply wanted some here to understand that exact mention, being it has been made repeatedly over and over in the past, ulshadow.

Thank you, sir.

seekerof

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 09:21 PM by Winchester Ranger T

The Russian tank looks to be a whole lot bigger than a Merkava.

You would only really know if there had been a technology transfer if we knew what was on the inside, not the outside.

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 09:58 PM by russiankid

wow thank you for the 3D look

its awesome!

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 10:15 PM by russiankid

... how can it be russian main tank when its not battle proven??? so our (russias) main battle tank is not battle proven... we rely on something that is unrelyable???

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 10:50 PM by DaVirus

Well take the SU-47 for one I actually thought that it was going to be Russia's next generation Fighter, but as far as I know its only used for experimental stuff. So I guess the Black Eagle is a Prototype for a newer one...

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 10:55 PM by russiankid

it could be the next fighter but its not a tank... not a ground unit... but it could be the next air fighter tough

reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 11:12 PM by chinawhite

the t-95 and the black eagle are 2 different tanks.

the black eagle is a T-80UM2 a racially upgraded t-80UM

the T-95 uses a unmammed turnet.

www.tanksim.com...

reply posted on 27-6-2005 @ 11:02 AM by russiankid

ok... which tanks are better??? the T-72 the T-90 or the M1A2 Abrams?
and who thinks that the black eagle is the best? (u cant really know that its the best
but just say it if u think it is)

[edit on 27-6-2005 by russiankid]

reply posted on 27-6-2005 @ 11:26 AM by ulshadow

Originally posted by russiankid
... how can it be russian main tank when its not battle proven??? so our (russias) main battle tank is not battle proven... we rely on something that is unrelyable???

what i am saying is that it never went into battle, i know it would be a good tank but if it never went into battle before you will never know how good it is. like the american M1 abrams MBT we know it's a good tank cause it went into battle many times and it sure kick the crap out of the enemy so it's battle proven that it is a good tank.

reply posted on 27-6-2005 @ 11:31 AM by russiankid

oh ic so its our MBT but it never went into battle... anybody think that they konw when they will go into battle???

reply posted on 27-6-2005 @ 11:35 AM by deltaboy