It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stumason
Level the city? Nice forward thinking there.
Originally posted by stumason
And you wonder why they keep on fighting!
Originally posted by thaei
1. Pro-US atsers urging NUKING NK, Iran preemptively. - no explanation needed here, views like this will never be legitimate in any discussion even if held with the neocons (although they may privately cherish the act). everybody, even the most anti-american atsers NEVER posts "AMERICA should be NUKED" but some overly patriotic posters openly endorse it on their enemy
and Titor is right, half of you should be dead.
2. PRO-US atsers claiming the ungodly superiority of the US military that they almost sound the same: "US can rule the world if we want, so thank us that we hadn't yet" - discussions regarding insurgents or military comparisons often lead to someone claiming this and someone agreeing with him/her.
3. Any criticism of the US govt/policy always result to pro-us atsers claiming the poster as anti-american. no matter how legitimate the criticism is, there is bound to be someone saying: Your hatred of america has blinded you".
4. Many same atsers criticize other governments for being dictatorial(censors the net, bans opposition) but when the same criticism of undemocratic practice is commited by the US govt. (patriot act) is made, some claim that those against the practice is unpatriotic. for parties concerned: "Is it that difficult to not see the obvious double standard in play here?"
Just to point out an obvious thing here, if there seems to be many more "anti-US" things on the board as opposed to "anti-country xyz" is that maybe, just maybe it is because it is America that is doing stuff that causes concern?
Originally posted by robertfenix
For example we could have just leveled Falluja with a massive wave of Large Bombs a huge carpet run from B52 with 2,000 lb bombs and just wiped out the city if we wanted to, no nuke required....
But our sense of steward ship and responsibility meant that we would have to fight it out with the terrorists on foot, causing the loss of many US soilders....
The US armed forces can inflict this kind of damage on a moments notice but are told not to to save public and international face...
We do not want the death of all muslims or arabs or any other person for that matter...
And its a good thing that our Goverment is not going to just sit back and let these people rattle their swords at us...
YOU WANT A FIGHT, WELL NOW YOU HAVE ONE.
It is good to see that cracters typecast by the first post are happy to act out their role on the stage of international cyberspace.
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
passerby says:
Just to point out an obvious thing here, if there seems to be many more "anti-US" things on the board as opposed to "anti-country xyz" is that maybe, just maybe it is because it is America that is doing stuff that causes concern?
That does explain why there are so few anti-Denmark or anti-Brazil posts, but it doesn't explain why there are so few anti-DPRK or anti-PRC or anti-Myanmar or anti-Iran or anti-Indonesia or anti-Rwanda or anti-Zimbabwe-posts, does it?
Originally posted by Boatphone
It is good to see that cracters typecast by the first post are happy to act out their role on the stage of international cyberspace.
And Masked you are carrying out your role and someone who cannot grasp the fact that America is at WAR. And even being at war we go out of our way to rebuild and protect people who live in the nations we are attacking.
It is very true that we could have sent in ZERO troops and just bombed Iraq for a year, but we didnt. Can you understand this???