It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by astroblade
and i suggest, Ocelot, you stop regurgitating what the conspiracy theorists tell you. if the disease was first spread in africa then why did the first cases appear in america?
Originally posted by XyZeR
If you look at who it targets then the possibility isn't that remote, i think there is a reason Africa and the Gay community is hit the hardest by this disease. Coincidence ?
Originally posted by Ocelot
It's not a coincidence. Black Africans and Homosexuals were targeted on purpose to test out the virus. Do some reading on it. You can find tons of info online as well as here on ATS. Do a search on past threads, you'll find all kinds of opinions on this.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
It’s still a theory you cant prove it, if you could stop being so ignorant you would see that the U.S. government had nothing to do with aids. But of course if you wanted to believe something so bad even if the facts were staring you in the face you still wouldn't see them
Dr. Boyd Ed Graves can be reached at 619-578-3254
On June 9, 1969, Dr. D.M. McArtor, then Deputy Director
of Research and Technology for the Department of Defense,
appeared before the House Subcommittee on Appropriations
to request funding for a project to produce a synthetic biological
agent for which humans have not yet acquired a natural immunity.
Dr. McArtor asked for $10 million dollars to produce this agent
over the next 5-10 years. The Congressional Record reveals that
according to the plan for the development of this germ agent,
the most important characteristic of the new disease would be
"that it might be refractory [resistant] to the immunological and
therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our
relative freedom from infectious disease". AIDS first appeared
as a public health risk ten years later.
The fact is our government does in fact do evil things.
Supposedly, HIV does not cause AIDS, since an infected human immune system will naturally create anti-HIV to fight off the HIV. It becomes AIDS until an person infected with HIV or (anti-HIV), take these "Loaded" nanites...I mean drugs such as AZT which supposed to help cope with the disease...
Originally posted by Tinkleflower
Look at it another way.
The older we get, the more likely we are to need longer term healthcare. If you're going to kill off large numbers of people, you've just removed that potential medical goldmine.
If it's all about money....then it'd be logical to conclude that the most prudent way of doing so would be to keep folk alive....and thus generate income over a much longer term.
You can't exactly get paid from a corpse...