Can Evolution be proven? or is it just a theory/religion?, page 18

reply to post by Cosmic.Artifact

---

I am so sick of hearing/reading "it's just a theory"!!!

Evolution is an established fact....on many, many levels. It is the ENTIRETY of the process that has yet to be fully understood, in ALL aspects.

ON that basis, it remains a "theory"....but, so do many, many, many OTHER science disciplines.

Evolution is a subject that will always (probably) have theoretical segments, parts that will defy any solid confirmation as to EXACT behavior, repeatable processes, etc. There is a RANDOM element to it, that will forever (I would think) preclude a final "definition".

Still, an intellectually honest individual, who takes time to look objectively at the facts, will realize that evolutionary theories are well-founded on a great deal of past empirical, and current ongoing, evidence......

reply to post by Cosmic.Artifact

---

I honestly thought you were smarter than that. Do you seriously not know the academic definition of theory?

A theory is a unifying framework of ideas, its a broad subject of study and is the most sturdy thing in science. Theory, in science, does not mean the same thing as theory in layman's terms.

Here's a picture I use that illustrates it well:





By the way Gravity, technically, is just a theory.

reply to post by Cosmic.Artifact

---

You asked this, in response to a quote of mine that mentioned SCIENCE:

I believe in an unseen God and the philosophies of a guy named Jesus

Whats the difference ?

Sorry if you can't understand the difference between observable, measurable, repeatable and predictable SCIENCE....and a "belief" in something based solely on, well....no more apt word for it other than "faith".

BTW, before this gets circular, as it sometimes does...."faith" is yet another word that is misunderstood....by the types of people who ALSO misunderstand the word "theory".

As the image ZJ posted above shows, an actual scientific theory, as defined, is NOT the same as someone merely "guessing" at something, and then using the word "theory" to describe that action.

THAT example would best be described as "hypothesizing"....but, even for science, an hypothesis is FAR more exacting than what we practice in our ordinary lives, when WE do it. OUR efforts are focused on our day-to-day existence and concerns, and aren't usually disciplined science-based, in the sense we're discussing regarding evolution, and theories of that sort.

On example of that (I am struggling to convey) is how we interact with other people...we intuit, we "guess", we use our experience and "hypothesize" on their actions, and try to predict their future behavior and reactions...that is NOT science, though. Hence, that well-worn habit gets muddled when scientific theory is brought up, and perceptions of actual science theory are colored by those personal experiences....

reply to post by expert999

---

the only way i can explain where i think it is, is by using a example.

if there was a murder, the police would gather evidence, they end up being able to prove that a suspect was in the right place at the right time, however they cannot prove he actually struck the person, even though all the signs point to him being the one who did it. so it is left to the jury.

that's kinda of where evolution is and we are the jury, so i would not say theory, i would say a theory with supporting evidence.

reply to post by Titen-Sxull

---

I prefer the dictionary version, not some internet truth.

the·o·ry
   /ˈθiəri, ˈθɪəri/ Show Spelled[thee-uh-ree, theer-ee] Show IPA
–noun,plural-ries.
1.
a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity.
2.
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
3.
Mathematics. a body of principles, theorems, or the like, belonging to one subject: number theory.
4.
the branch of a science or art that deals with its principles or methods, as distinguished from its practice: music theory.
5.
a particular conception or view of something to be done or of the method of doing it; a system of rules or principles.
6.
contemplation or speculation.
7.
guess or conjecture.

5,6,7 being quite proper.

reply to post by Cosmic.Artifact

---

You types (not a pejorative, mind you...but referring to those pre-disposed to "believe" in so-called "creation"....I am assuming this, based on earlier comments) tend to use that dictionary definition, in that manner. In a "false argument" style.

You are INCORRECT to focus on the last three, from that listing...5, 6, and 7.

Learn about how dictionaries rank their word definitions, and WHY they are ordered in the way published.....

Find a printed, bound REAL dictionary. Open it up to the first page, and begin to read it. See what it tells you about itself, and the editors, and how they list definitons...what criteria they use.

The "Internet" isn't the only place for information, you know.......

reply to post by expert999

---

Breath is love and is life.$*


Surely, a good question, can evolution be proven?!!

It probably is that the same DNA we find in animals is a sign of one creator. Ever thought about that?

nothing further to think about that. We were created, why

Why doubt about it, why want to know it? JHVH lord created us. The science of the earth can take such weird bends.?

The Genesis Code
  Posted 7 days ago with 4 member flags

Explain Diversity Reloaded
  Posted 8 days ago with 3 member flags

Tree of Life and Tree of Knowledge
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags

The carrot (chicken or egg , vegetable version)
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags

A theory of proof of a God
  Posted 8 days ago with 2 member flags

Eden: The Double Sided Coin
  Posted 2 days ago with 2 member flags

We are all connected with nature and The Universe IMO
  Posted 2 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: