posted on Aug, 14 2003 @ 05:25 PM
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
I still have yet to see the difference between liberals and cinservatives.
Conservatives: whites and self hating minorities who hate anyone who isnt a white anglo saxon protestant
Liberals: Minorities and self hating whites who hate anyone who is white.
They both hate people because of race.
Conservatives:forcefully dogamtic goons who want to shove a puritan christian state down peoples throats because thats whats best for them
Liberals:forcefulldogmatic goons who want to shove "new" and "enlightened" polices down peoples throats because its best for them.
The both are dogmatic goons who force thier agendas on others
Conservatives: anti constituional tyrants who want to kill the first and 4th amendments, along with the civil rights and womens sufferage amendment
Liberals: anti constitutional tyrants who want to kill the first, second, and end of prhibition amedments, as well as enforce unconstitutional
The both are undermining the constituion.
Cobservatives: terrorize anyone who holds ideals opposite thiers.
Liberals: terorize anyone who holds ideals opposite thiers.
They both terrorize people for not agreeing with them.
SO I ASK AGAIN,K WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?
OK. I'll be the bad guy. I do not agree as willfully as others with your assessment.
You seem to also generalize in a negative sense the attributes of billions of people on this planet.
Liberals vs Conservatives. The two are not truly distinct as all share core ideas and beliefs of how life should be lead. The label and archetype are
used to give reference to a general
idea of thought amoungst a uncalculated number of peoples grouped by political affiliation, general as that
I, as the forgotten Black(re: Minority)hehe person of this board am somewhat offended to be called self- hating because I am labeled conservative in a
Negative sense. Do I hate myself because of my ethnic/heritage history? By no reason! I believe it takes a little bit more resolve to stand up and
buck the status quo and break out of lockstep with ideas that are proscribed for a whole.
My example is this-
The Washington Times:
You really have to look at the gray areas too or you gloss over a larger idea in America: America.
We did not begin as Liberals and Conservatives, we began as those seeking fredom from tyranny resulting from monarchy. The deterioration is evident by
the content of your post which, is indeed reflective of the division we face across the divide of ideology that has emerged in this country. The third
leg of this tripod is political atheism- non-belief in any ideology either party offers within the system.
Yes, some terroize the weak into submission into their party line- the elderly are targeted frequently, some have subverted the law for gain and
power. Yet are these the sum of our system or the exception?
I think the discussion is not as in depth as it can be to ferret out this answer.