Airbus rudder/tail problems?, page 1

In February 1996 the space shuttle Columbia was on a mission as a
spacegenerator - accelerator with a satellite, in searching of the Higgs
Boson. This experimental satellite was tethered to the space shuttle by a
12,8 mile long cable, which was blown apart by an unpredictable excess of
energy. The satellite was lost in space. The end of the tether looked
charred and melted. There was a large electrical discharge along the tether.
What went wrong? What went successful? Was the Higgs
Boson discovered?

The forces developed by "cold plasma" (or entropy) can be thousands of times greater than theory predicts. All electronics was fried. It would seem that this possibility, which owes its origin to a fundamental breach of physical law, was not factored into the design of the experiment. It is no wonder that the cable fused and the mission failed and that is all because the extremely high anomalous "cold plasma" (or entropy) forces know from decades of research have never been properly understood by the scientific community. The failure of a space mission aimed at generating power in space because far more power was produced than was bargained for. It had not been understood that the "false vacuum" which fills that space is ready and willing to shed excess energy once we contrive to develop circuital current flow.

In 1996(!) Aspden H. in "Space Shuttle "Columbia" Encounters Excess Energy. New Energy News". Vol. 3, № 9, March 1996, pp. 1-2.
]http://www.padrak.com/ine/BLOWSNASA.html]
wrote:
"The United States of America should not be sending men into space on
missions aimed at power generation by tapping into plasma fields until
enough research on the anomalous plasma discharge problem has been done in the Earth-based laboratory environment to understand fully this mystery energy source."

On February 1, 2003 the space shuttle Columbia was lost during its re-entry into Earth's atmosphere. What went wrong?
The investigation into what caused the break-up of the space shuttle
supports the theory that a left wing panel broke off during its mission,
possibly playing a role in its demise. The wing fragment where heat spiked
just before the spacecraft disintegrated is made of a sophisticated material
known as reinforced CARBON, that is designed to withstand extreme heat, but not ENTROPY. Corrosion along the wing's front edge might also have played a part. Investigators have narrowed the location where devastating superheated atmospheric gases entered the shuttle during its re-entry to somewhere near the leading edge of the left wing.

The investigators do not know where the breach in the wing was, but they say their probe points to several theories (entropy law or Second aw???) . .

Due to entropy, hiding damage of an airplane or a space shuttle, if not
addressed, may led to multiple site fatigue damage and fatigue cracking and could result in structural failure of the airplane or the space shuttle. The manufacturers of pressurized transport-category airplanes or space shuttles have to include in their structural repair manuals, training programs, and other maintenance guidance, warnings about the possibility of structural failure resulting from hidden damage.

Entropy won?