It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Siroos
Many Iranian exile opposition groups have for more than 6 months now called on all Iranians to boycott the Iranian presidential elections. President Bush has as recently as only a couple of days ago urged the Iranian nation to boycott the elections and thereby show to the world that the Islamic Republic of Iran is "illegitimate". But Iranians as usual turned out in full force with a close to 70% voter turnout.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Read my post. Then re-read it again. And please point out where I used the word terrorist.
What the hell are you talking about?
Originally posted by djohnsto77
When did the U.S. call Iranians to boycott the elections???
I must have missed that statement...
WND
Iran's radical cleric-led regime is bolstering its efforts to jam satellite television signals from about 20 foreign TV channels beaming calls to boycott a nationwide election widely regarded as fraudulent.
A man who installs satellite dishes, which technically are banned by the regime but in wide use, told Agence France- Presse the microwaves used to block the signals "have never been so strong."
The move comes on the heels of coverage by foreign radio and TV channels of the "Iran Freedom Walk," from Philadelphia to Washington, D.C., in which participants called for peaceful regime change and for Iranians to stay away from the polls June 17.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Dissident does not equal terrorist, now does it?
But then, maybe it your selective eyes it does, eh?
Originally posted by jsobecky
One has to look no further than the recent parliamentary elections, in which 2,300 candidates were arbitrarily disqualified by the Council of Guardians, to realize that true, free elections in Iran are stll a distant dream.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Ace,
Nothing in there says that the U.S. government is doing this or supporting it.
WND
.....Several members of Congress have expressed interest in participating in the rally, including Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., and Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa.
--snip--
Their message and interactions are beamed back to Iran each day by the Voice of America's Iran service on both television and radio and by Radio Free Europe's Radio Farda, which has a reporter on the walk. Also, radio KRSI - a Farsi-language service in California that reaches Iran via satellite - is following it. The coverage includes profiles on American life as seen in the cities and towns on the route.
payvand
Washington, DC, June 17, 2005 -- The Broadcasting Board of Governors today announced it is using a third satellite to help overcome jamming of Persian-language news broadcasts during Iran’s election period.
The broadcasts affected include Voice of America’s (VOA) direct-to-home Persian-language satellite television news programs, Radio Farda, and VOA English. The three are carried on the Eutelsat Hotbird satellite and Telstar 12. Today, the BBG Office of Engineering added a third satellite transmission. This additional signal makes it more difficult for Iranian authorities to block the broadcasts in many locations.
BBG Chairman Kenneth Y. Tomlinson condemned Iranian attempts to jam satellite television and radio services that carry U.S. international broadcasting for Persian audiences: “That the government of Iran would jam Persian television and other U.S. international broadcasts illustrates how threatened the authorities are by truth.” Tomlinson said the BBG would continue to counter efforts to block open and free information by providing programs on multiple satellites and transponders.
Originally posted by AceOfBase
You just kind of proved the point made by WyrdeOne.
Someone committing a terrorist act is considered a dissident when they're doing it against people or Governments you don't like. The same act against the US or a US ally would be called a terrorist for doing the same things.
by Kriz_4
You are obviously privvy to information we are not.
Can you tell us why the candidates were disqualified? I would like to know.
The elections took place amidst a serious political crisis that developed due to the January 2004 decision of the conservative vetting body, the Council of Guardians, to ban thousands of candidates from running -- nearly half of the total. A vast number of reformists, including some of their leaders, and particularly members of the Islamic Iran Participation Front (IIPF), were barred from running. In many parts of Iran, there weren't even enough independent candidates approved, so the reformists couldn't form an alliance with them. Out of a possible 285 seats (5 seats are reserved for religious minorities: Christians, Jews, and Zoroastrians), the participating reformist parties could only introduce 191 candidates.
:
The day before the election, the reformist newspapers Yas-e-no and Shargh were banned.
Farce