UK Armed Forces, page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 26-7-2005 @ 02:34 PM by Cilandak
The Challenger 5.1km kill was with the Challenger during GW1 not the Challenger II which has a different (improved) main gun. The Challenger II is a great tank, as to if it's the best tank? Who knows? One of its strengths is its ability to engage mutiple targets in a short time frame, as the commander selects a targetting sequence for the gunner and the gun automaticlly aligns the gun on the next target. Theoretically a squadron of Challenger IIs could do away with a regiment of armour in under a minute. Additionally, its armour package is second to none. The British Army, at this time, has some of the best training facilities available to it on the planet. Live fire ranges for battle group training takes place in Canada. Vehicle simulators in the UK and Germany allow crews to practice unit manouevers as a battle group without wearing out equipment, or the tax payers wallet.. Its weaknesses, such as they are, is communications (to be put right with Bowman) and the a relatively low level of magnification for some of the optics when compared to the MIA2SEP. If you wanted to be picky, for urban warfare it could use some more remotely operated machine guns. If you look at an Israeli tank, they seem to half half a dozen hanging off them

So the Challenger II is definately a competitor. Having the best tank doesn't mean too much if you don't know what to do with them though. The French had the best tank on the planet in 1940 and look what happened to them.
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Eerie Second World War RAF fighter plane discovered in the Sahara
  Posted 14 days ago with 8 member flags
Stealth chopper based in Nevada
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
HIFiRE Scramjet Research Flight Will Advance Hypersonic Technology
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags