China's military closing the gap with U.S. of A., page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 27-6-2005 @ 07:06 AM by chinawhite
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer


More room? The F-14 is 50% bigger then the F-22. It has more thrust.


I meant room as in they already have carrier full of aircraft how are they going to accomundate airforce jets to. airforce poilots flying the planes or navy pilots


You don't even try and give an explanation? What exactly is wrong with those nations? They are all strong allies. We built Afghanistan's government. Australia and South Korea have both gone into Iraq with us, and contributed large numbers of troops.


IRAQ. south koprea and australia both have very strong ties to chinas economy. they had nothing to lose by going to iraq.



More like the entire developed world who buys Chinese goods. And China would be #ed because without the low prices goods, they loose massive amounts of investment.


and china buys machinery raw materials etc... does any other country have a large trade deficit with china?



Bull. There were interviews and pictures done with people in the square who were injured.


Proof?



I remembered my statement, you just didn't specifically address it in the entire topic. There was no argument on it. And what I said is entirely true.


True do you have any proof to back that up



And in all out war between America and China, Australia's trade with China is going to be shut down, anyway. Nothing would be coming in or out of China by way of sea. The best bet they have is to simply end the war as quickly as possible, and that's done by helping America in the end.



Yeah what happens after? do you think the chinese are going to have warm feelings to australian imports.

how long is this war going to be frought?


reply posted on 27-6-2005 @ 09:48 PM by Disturbed Deliverer
I meant room as in they already have carrier full of aircraft how are they going to accomundate airforce jets to. airforce poilots flying the planes or navy pilots


If that's what you were talking abut, then your statement isn't even worth addressing it's that god damn foolish.

IRAQ. south koprea and australia both have very strong ties to chinas economy. they had nothing to lose by going to iraq.


Well, I don't see any explanation for Afghanistan. Guess that means I won't even get some half-assed explanation from you on that one.

They have more ties with America militarily, economically and socially. They won't be able to trade with China as long as America and China are at war, anyway.

and china buys machinery raw materials etc... does any other country have a large trade deficit with china?


Japan, and just about every other developed nation that trades with China.

True do you have any proof to back that up


For someone who gives so little proof, you sure ask for a lot of it.

Known for its combat role in the Korean conflict, this aircraft was single-handedly responsible for turning the tide of the air war in favor of the United States.


www.globalsecurity.org...

Yeah what happens after? do you think the chinese are going to have warm feelings to australian imports.


After China will be in American hands, and Australian companies will be given special privelages in the rebuilding process.

Also, FredT didn't call it a holocaust, he compared YOU to the people who deny the holocaust happened.

[edit on 27-6-2005 by Disturbed Deliverer]


reply posted on 27-6-2005 @ 11:10 PM by chinawhite
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer

If that's what you were talking abut, then your statement isn't even worth addressing it's that god damn foolish.


i was talking about that all along



Well, I don't see any explanation for Afghanistan. Guess that means I won't even get some half-assed explanation from you on that one.

They have more ties with America militarily, economically and socially. They won't be able to trade with China as long as America and China are at war, anyway.


afganistan doesn't need a mention. just imagine the logistic problems.

China is koreas largest expot market and austrailas second. how much south koreans australians live in america



Japan, and just about every other developed nation that trades with China.


www.rieti.go.jp...



For someone who gives so little proof, you sure ask for a lot of it.


you haven't gave any proof in you arguement with me.... and i have provided links maps and quotes. i dont have to spoon feed you everytime you wanna know something.

Known for its combat role in the Korean conflict, this aircraft was single-handedly responsible for turning the tide of the air war in favor of the United States.
www.globalsecurity.org...


Ummm.......... whats this have to do with anything



After China will be in American hands, and Australian companies will be given special privelages in the rebuilding process.

Also, FredT didn't call it a holocaust, he compared YOU to the people who deny the holocaust happened.



ummmm....... you think china is going to let people in their country. think about the 2+million troops + reserve forces +milta... ifs gonna be a long war. it wouldn't matter how much high-tech equipment you have you wont have enough to patrol the chiense population


reply posted on 28-6-2005 @ 06:52 PM by Disturbed Deliverer
afganistan doesn't need a mention. just imagine the logistic problems


Afghanistan borders China. What logistical problems would there be? It certainly wouldn't be more difficult then launching from Australia or Japan.

China is koreas largest expot market and austrailas second. how much south koreans australians live in america


First, there aren't that many of either group in America. We don't even have that many Chinese.

www.rieti.go.jp...


You'll notice this part right here:

Of this amount, exports to China surged 43.6% to $57.2 billion, while imports from China rose 21.9% to $75.2 billion.


That's a trade deficit.

And they had to add in Hong Kong and Taiwan to tip the scales in China for everything else. Pretty pathetic...

you haven't gave any proof in you arguement with me.... and i have provided links maps and quotes. i dont have to spoon feed you everytime you wanna know something.


I just gave links in my last post. I've given a source anytime you've asked. You have not done the same.

Ummm.......... whats this have to do with anything


Before the Sabre was introduced into Korea, the airwar was in the communist forces favor.

ummmm....... you think china is going to let people in their country. think about the 2+million troops + reserve forces +milta... ifs gonna be a long war. it wouldn't matter how much high-tech equipment you have you wont have enough to patrol the chiense population


The only problem is supplying the bullets. With weapons like gunships, any mob of Chinese civillians could be cut down easy. Once America gains air superiority, and we will, it's over for all Chinese conventional forces.

i dont deny people died in beijing but no-one was killed in tiananmen square


I still fail to see what the point of bringing this up is. Even if true (it's just a dumb statement by the Chinese government), it shows nothing at all. Thousands of civllians were still killed.

The accomplishments of the CCF (Chinese Communist Forces) against an army which was far better armed, and which enjoyed total air supremacy, are truly remarkable. Although the NK had been well armed by Russia, and carefully prepared for their invasion of the South, the CCF were so ill-equipped to challenge a modern army that it is almost understandable why our Far East Command initially thought they were an ineffective rabble of "volunteers". Armed with a bewildering mixture of British, US, Japanese and other weapons, presenting an incomprehensible logistics problem, without heavy artillery or tanks, and no air power, it was difficult for high command to take them seriously. Plus, they gave no obvious sign of their entry, let alone their large numbers, until they first attacked.


When China first invaded, it had superiority. It had Russian pilots and a large number of Mig-15's (over 1,000). America wouldn't even let its pilots fly until we got the Sabre.


reply posted on 28-6-2005 @ 11:05 PM by chinawhite
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer


Afghanistan borders China. What logistical problems would there be? It certainly wouldn't be more difficult then launching from Australia or Japan.


austraila and japan both aren't land- locked countries. you would need to fly everything in. pakistan wouldn't let you use their ports or iran.



First, there aren't that many of either group in America. We don't even have that many Chinese.


omg. you said those countries were connected more socialy compared to china. i was pointing out how many south koreans and austrailans live there.



You'll notice this part right here:

Of this amount, exports to China surged 43.6% to $57.2 billion, while imports from China rose 21.9% to $75.2 billion.


That's a trade deficit.

And they had to add in Hong Kong and Taiwan to tip the scales in China for everything else. Pretty pathetic...


i those figures are out-dated. chinese and japanese trade reached 160billion



I just gave links in my last post. I've given a source anytime you've asked. You have not done the same.


one link to nothing about the subject were talking about.

if you want me to quote the links i gave you then i will



Before the Sabre was introduced into Korea, the airwar was in the communist forces favor.



the mig-15 was first flown in korea in november 1950 and the sabre entered service in december 1950. i dont see a huge time gap?

By September 1951, with some 525 MiG-15s in the Yalu area, Soviet and Chinese leaders were confident enough to begin planning the deployment of Chinese and new North Korean MiG-15 regiments into North Korea itself, outside Chinese sanctuaries.




The only problem is supplying the bullets. With weapons like gunships, any mob of Chinese civillians could be cut down easy. Once America gains air superiority, and we will, it's over for all Chinese conventional forces.


yeah tried gain air superioty with 10,000 anti-air missile launchers.... It hasn't been proven that air power alone can win a war. WW2, Korean war, vietnam.



I still fail to see what the point of bringing this up is. Even if true (it's just a dumb statement by the Chinese government), it shows nothing at all. Thousands of civllians were still killed.


thousands??

read my links that i have provided.

the offical estimate of the US governement is 180-500killed



When China first invaded, it had superiority. It had Russian pilots and a large number of Mig-15's (over 1,000). America wouldn't even let its pilots fly until we got the Sabre.


Please please please stop with these ignorant post.....

During the height of the korean war. russia deployed 2 divisions and china deplyed 2 divisions and north korea im not sure. all together there was 525 planes .

chinas airforce in 1953 numbered 1000 planes of all sorts... in the first phase of the war the chinese pilots didn't have air cover. china didn't deploy her airforce into the korean war at the time. only in 1951 did she recivie mig-15s

www.afa.org...


[size=4]Disturbed Deliverer you are very misinformed.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Nano Drones Flying in Formation
  Posted 10 days ago with 15 member flags
FPS RUSSIA
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags
Spinel Thin Transparent Ceramic Armor defeats Barrett .50 Cal BMG
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
Self-steering Bullet Researched
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags
Shockrounds take out three of your five senses.
  Posted 3 days ago with 5 member flags
Defective Ammunition Warning
  Posted 3 days ago with 5 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 68 replies