It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
.......and then there is the entire issue of how your gov & industry expects to sell to Europe but wouldn't dream of buying European. Even the BAe Hawks you had to make in the US.....
Originally posted by Zaphod58
As far as planes go, there are several countries that outsource to build our planes there, so why shouldn't we? Korea is buying the F-15K, the first of which are to be built here in the US, later models in Korea once the equipment is in place. Japan builds the F-15J. That's common with Russia as well. As far as buying planes mostly built by Boeing, again why wouldn't we? We have an industry leader here in the US, so what would be the point of buying predominantly from another country to supply our transportation aircraft? If Airbus and Boeing had the same history, I'm sure that you would see the same thing happening in Europe with them buying predominantly Airbus, and the US buying Boeing. It just makes more sense if you have a company like that in your country.
Originally posted by Qwazzy
Boeing is only assembling the planes in th US, not building them.
Originally posted by Qwazzy
I pesonally think all the technology is in Japan and Europe. American cars get the WORST fuel efficiency in the world. Airbus, I personnaly think, is the best plane maker. No oofense to anyone that's American, but all the technology that you have is from somewhere else. The first car was made in Europe. German scientists were way ahead that the Americans in making the atomic bomb, 3-4 years exactly. The small, fuel-efficient cars were made in Japan. The first car in the US was made in 1895-6, 10 years later that Karl Benz in Germany. I could go on and on about this but i think you get the point.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Originally posted by Qwazzy
I pesonally think all the technology is in Japan and Europe. American cars get the WORST fuel efficiency in the world. Airbus, I personnaly think, is the best plane maker. No oofense to anyone that's American, but all the technology that you have is from somewhere else. The first car was made in Europe. German scientists were way ahead that the Americans in making the atomic bomb, 3-4 years exactly. The small, fuel-efficient cars were made in Japan. The first car in the US was made in 1895-6, 10 years later that Karl Benz in Germany. I could go on and on about this but i think you get the point.
Sure and all the technology from almost every country in the world started somewhere else. Germany built cars first, now Japan makes them. The US made the first flight, now many countries make planes. So why is it different for the US? You make it seem like it's a bad thing that the US uses technology that was started in another country, when every country in the world almost, does the same thing.
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
It's called co-production, which is why every single WAH-64 Apache was made by Westland (now Agusta Westland) made in Yeovil with RTM engines, jsut like the Japanese AH-64Ds are made by Subaru in Utsunomiya with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries engines.
let me tell you about bikes. Japanese bikes are as reliable as the day is long, but they have no soul (I have owned about ten of them, from all four of the big makers).
And, I am embarrassed to say, I have owned a Milwaukee Tracter, a genuwine Hogley Davidson and would never own another.
And the Italian bikes? Well, they're okay, I guess, but I'm a confirmed heterosexual, so that sort of lets me out.
I think we can agree that there is only one country that knows how to make real motorcycles.
But Jaysus, man, you gotta do something about those $^**)^Y#^%%&()* Lucas electrics!!!!
Originally posted by Figher Master FIN
Yeah... Nice comments... Does anybody here think that somebody will build the A380 to a perfect luxury plane... or will everybody stick to the standard "We'll build as many seats as possible"...?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
As long as it's built for the airlines, the "We need to put as many people as we can" attitude will prevail. The airlines are out for profit plain and simple, so they'll want to get as many people as they can on a plane. There may be some luxury added to it, but they'll have as many seats as they can.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
From what I've heard, British Airways is NOT planning to buy the 380. But the airlines have to make profit to survive. If they increase ticket prices, fewer people will fly, therefore less profit, therefore they have to cut costs to keep from losing money, so less luxury...... it's a catch-22.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
From what I've heard, British Airways is NOT planning to buy the 380. But the airlines have to make profit to survive.