It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Say one person mentions that aliens are helpful and kind, while others say they are mean and malicious. Well really which one is it?
If one person claims they exist and another claims they don't, well someone is a liar.
Do you really think the government can hide every single UFO that crashes, lands etc?
Say one person mentions that aliens are helpful and kind, while others say they are mean and malicious. Well really which one is it?
Originally posted by Gazrok
Say one person mentions that aliens are helpful and kind, while others say they are mean and malicious. Well really which one is it?
Are all humans helpful and kind, or are they mean and malicious?
I believe you have your answer...
Originally posted by Phood
My personal belief is that there is simply too much evidence to ignore it.
So, yes, I believe that there is SOMETHING to it, how much importance it holds I'm not sure of, but it seems pretty significant.
Wether we will ever know who is right or wrong in this life, I don't know, but hopefully
Originally posted by lost_shaman
I don't understand why hard evidence should be everywhere?
1.) Aliens (if they exist) would be intelligent , would understand cross-contamination, would take measures to avoid this when possible. ( Un-like many of today’s criminals.)
Originally posted by Ksnazdnzon
Without evidence we can't prove much.
Originally posted by Dulcimer
A simple general topic, but really covers all aspects of the belief in E.T. life.
When covering topics of UFO's and aliens, everyone with a sighting seems to have a different story to tell. Now thats fine because UFO's, like automobiles, may come in different shapes and forms. When we talk about alien contact things tend to change.
We can agree that there are possibly multiple kinds of aliens, greys etc and thats alright.
But the stories are filled with contradictions to other peoples accounts.
Say one person mentions that aliens are helpful and kind, while others say they are mean and malicious. Well really which one is it?
This is just one example in the realm. We could go on and on.
1- Ufos Exist 2-Ufos don't exist
1-Something alien crashed 2-A weather balloon crashed
etc, etc.
Someone is lieing.
If one person claims they exist and another claims they don't, well someone is a liar.
Originally posted by Ksnazdnzon
Hard Evidence should be presented, because without it the explanations of explaining what really happens are endless. If you see a light in the sky, it could be aliens, but it could be just about anything if you have no evidence.
Hallucinations
Angels
Spirits
Ghosts
Flashlight thrown out of a plane.
Intellegent Flying Flames
Magic Glowing Flying Monkeys
Giant Intellegent Onions that are in two dimensions at once, and reflecting a glare from the 57 suns in the other dimension.
It can be ANYTHING.
Also.. Why do you assume aliens HAVE to be intellgent? I know it has nothing to do with my previous arguement, I just thought that was a pretty close-minded remark. I mean.. they could be giant living molecules that have been preprogrammed to transport matter from a distant planet.. lol who knows.
Without evidence we can't prove much.
[edit on 17-6-2005 by Ksnazdnzon]
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Originally posted by Ksnazdnzon
Hard Evidence should be presented, because without it the explanations of explaining what really happens are endless. If you see a light in the sky, it could be aliens, but it could be just about anything if you have no evidence.
Hallucinations
Angels
Spirits
Ghosts
Flashlight thrown out of a plane.
Intellegent Flying Flames
Magic Glowing Flying Monkeys
Giant Intellegent Onions that are in two dimensions at once, and reflecting a glare from the 57 suns in the other dimension.
It can be ANYTHING.
Also.. Why do you assume aliens HAVE to be intellgent? I know it has nothing to do with my previous arguement, I just thought that was a pretty close-minded remark. I mean.. they could be giant living molecules that have been preprogrammed to transport matter from a distant planet.. lol who knows.
Without evidence we can't prove much.
[edit on 17-6-2005 by Ksnazdnzon]
Also , beyond that , to get here would require navigation, and planning, (i.e. life-support systems, bringing or making food along the way and supporting themselves while they are here), once here more navigation is required to get anywhere in particular.
Originally posted by Ksnazdnzon
So they can get here by means unimaginable and undiscovered by human science, but would still follow and act like a human in every other way? Right.
We can't apply any of our human ideas to aliens, we just have to figure out if they are here with concrete proof.
If we can't find that, doesn't mean they are not here.. but it means anything could be here. I mean I can't prove giant onions are controlling all your thoughts but it doesn't mean they are not doing it.
But you would somewhat think(well, I think so anyway) that they would have a common agenda, a common goal, so that they would maybe act the same way?
My two cents
First , we have tons of " Soft" evidence , enough to make a conviction in a court of law!