It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Odium
May Day Riots: 2004 and 2003 (1st of May) the Police attacked protestors and then blamed them for starting the violence. (Was there) This has happened in both Germany and Britain. In 2000 about 10 German people were so seriously injured due to Police violence they were in a critical condiction.
Originally posted by Odium
Problem is China has what 1/5th the population of the world? It's going to have corrupt aspects of it and the gangs will be a lot larger as will there be more corrupt politicians as there are more of them.
Originally posted by Odium
But still I've yet to see one bit of this link back to the National Government, only a small region and still the National Government are getting the blame for it.
Originally posted by Hamburglar
I am not sure that 6 people qualifies as a massacre. A terrible loss of life to be sure, but a massacre? Zimbabwe is experiencing massacres now, Rwanda experienced massacres...this is not a massacre. This is ugly for sure, but not a massacre.
Originally posted by Hamburglar
Why do we have to create a circus-like superlative atmosphere for everything. It's always, "the worst since...," or, "the biggest since..." Who cares?
Originally posted by Hamburglar
It is usually not relevant to the situation and it really serves to diminish the event. As in, "this riot/massacre wasn't nearly as bad as the last time."
Originally posted by Hamburglar
I say we get over the superlatives, stop going for the shock value in EVERYTHING, and try to keep a little bit of perspective on things when we read about this stuff.
In a nutshell, there were ties found linking crime lords, power bosses, and local government officials. The police had been harassing the people for months, and they had testimony from one of the captured thugs that he and others were paid $12 by them to beat up the villagers.
As to why they didn't just choose to use the Army, my guess is "Plausible Deniability". If they aren't in official police or army uniforms, the government isn't BLATANTLY responsible to the world.
What, just because it happens in Botswana, or Zaire, or some other god-forsaken place, it's okay for China to do this?
The reason the article is a shot at China is because China should know better!
Dominic Waghorn, Sky's Asia correspondent, said: "These are the pictures China does its best to stop the rest of the world from seeing.
"But this time they have got out.
"It looks like a medieval battle but this is Chinese protest control in the 21st century."
Originally posted by Hamburglar
First, thanks for the good story libra.
That said, I wonder if anyone else takes issue with our culture of superlatives. Instead of just calling this a riot where a few (6) people were killed, we call it
.
worst massacre in China since the Tiananmen Square massacre of 1989
I am not sure that 6 people qualifies as a massacre. A terrible loss of life to be sure, but a massacre? Zimbabwe is experiencing massacres now, Rwanda experienced massacres...this is not a massacre. This is ugly for sure, but not a massacre.
Also, the article itself didn't actually say that it was the worst massacre. instead, it said it was the
worst footage of violence to emerge from the secretive country since the Tiananmen Square massacre of 1989.
Big difference there if you ask me. Careful with that thelibra.
Honestly though, why can't we be content to say this is a terrible thing and let's not let it happen again? Why do we have to create a circus-like superlative atmosphere for everything. It's always, "the worst since...," or, "the biggest since..." Who cares? It is usually not relevant to the situation and it really serves to diminish the event. As in, "this riot/massacre wasn't nearly as bad as the last time."
I say we get over the superlatives, stop going for the shock value in EVERYTHING, and try to keep a little bit of perspective on things when we read about this stuff.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
This kind of uninformed guessing, tenuous conjecture, extrapolation and gross generalization only comes from a misunderstanding of the internal workings of China as a nation.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
You state that local officials are to blame, and then you go on to describe a theory of how the central government is behind it all.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
In Chinese there is a saying, "yi pian gai quan", which means to take one side of a situation and stretch it to cover everything. I reiterate - the actions of corrupt local officials does not incriminate the national government.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
And local officials have absolutely no control over the PLA. The CCP, bunch of crooks though they are, do not order these kind of actions willy-nilly. This kind of uprising is a thorn in the side and an embarrassment to the party. Where the CCP's criminality lies is in covering up these sort of incidents to protect their image, not in ordering them to be carried out. There are plenty of criminal and inhumane actions that the CCP do commit, without having to clutch at straws by blaming them for every little violent episode that occurs in China.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
What sweeping rhetoric is this? Thelibra, I'm surprised at you. 'China this', and 'China that'. Replace these words with 'America this' and 'America that' and not only will you have an uproar, but you will have put your finger on exactly why lately this forum has become a bi-partisan farce, whereby you either take a stance to defend America, or attack America, or you are simply ignored.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
"China should know better"? What the hell are you talking about? These are the actions of corrupt, local officials in a country of 1.3 billion people, not the actions of the CCP kingpins, and not of the Chinese people in general.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
If Bush attacks Iran, or the ATF burns children at Waco, should I then say, "America should know better"? Or, "Thelibra should know better"?
I see the new cold war propaganda with mainland China is affecting even the more astute members here. Score one for Lockheed-Martin's coffers.
thelibra said
Yes, in the case of Waco, America SHOULD have known better. I have no idea at all how you arrive at "Thelibra should know better". While I admit to having a large amount of followers in my quest for World Domination, I had absolutely nothing to do with either Waco or Iraq, and the inference that I did is ludicrous.
thelibra said
As to why they didn't just choose to use the Army, my guess is "Plausible Deniability". If they aren't in official police or army uniforms, the government isn't BLATANTLY responsible to the world.
wecomeinpeace said
China this', and 'China that'. Replace these words with 'America this' and 'America that' and not only will you have an uproar, but you will have put your finger on exactly why lately this forum has become a bi-partisan farce, whereby you either take a stance to defend America, or attack America, or you are simply ignored.
thelibra said
I'm rather surprised at you as well. You're raising a flag against something that isn't there, and now tying it into a completely unrelated situation as well to try and support a moot point. Bravo! What exactly are you trying to accomplish here?
thelibra said
You stress that "these are the actions of corrupt local officials" - No. They were the actions of uniformed men, in camo, armed with shotguns, and at the time of the quoted articles, ties had been found to local police and government officials. This does not mean that those local officials were to blame, nor does it mean that the chain of command that caused it stopped with them. It could have come from much higher up, or it could have come from someone else completely. What I reported were the ties. Then I offered a guess, later on, and stated it as a guess.
thelibra said
They were the actions of uniformed men, in camo...
wecomeinpeace said
Score one for Lockheed-Martin's coffers.
thelibra said
No, it has nothing to do with propaganda, and I have no idea WTF you are talking about with LM, or how they enter into this. It doesn't take propaganda of any sort to piss me off when I see people murdered in cold blood.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
Yeah, sorry mate. I had a bad day that day and was a little drunk.
...(snip)...
I apologize again for my tone and for maybe misreading your intent, and I hope we can continue to debate amicably in the future.