Take an example of humbled_one,that guy has the nerve to debunk that aliens dont exist and reptilians are a figment of our imagination and says that
the lacerta files are fake.SON I know 2 people aka menguard and vertu who have clarified that it is true and both are in contact with the
Oh, well if they are coming on the internet and SAYING it's true, then who are WE to doubt it, right?
My personal opinion is that the Lacerta
files are fake. Why? Because it doesn't stand up to logic....and we've gone through this in numerous threads, analyzing the Lacerta files.
YOu think that any person would have soo much creativity to pull that thing off(lacerta files).This site's motto is deny ingorance and lacerta said
that our kind is more ignorant than thought.
I'm still amazed that someone had the creativity to write "The Wizard of Oz" or "Alice in Wonderland". Both show FAR more creativity than the
Lacerta files. If we humans are so ignorant, how did we manage to drive them underground? Why is she so bitter?
Wake up people this site has been invaded by debunkers and to all debunkers who think that the truth would be supressed forever then consider this:
JUDGEMENT DAY IS INEVITABLE,YOU CAN ONLY POSTPONE IT but it is inevitable.
Just because someone doesn't believe one cockamamee file doesn't make them a debunker. Am I a debunker? Yes I suppose, when something seems false
or fake. But, at the same time, I attempt to show the evidence, and make the case for a solid event, when it can stand up to the arguments of
skeptics. In crusading for truth, one has to be willing to throw out evidence that just doesn't pass the test. For me, the Lacerta files do not
pass this test. For you, the Lacerta files are more than evidence now, they serve as the cornerstone of your faith and the anchor for all that you
believe on the subject. That's a dangerous role for any one small piece of evidence...
ps:and saying that the lacerta,dulce files are total fake is saying that dinosaurs didn't existed
Really? I don't recall any fossil evidence of these intelligent reptoids. We have that for dinos. I don't recall any physical evidence for the
dulce base. We have the physical remains of dinos. There are only a handful of people claiming the existence of the dulce base...and each has more
than their share of history with lies, deception, and outright fraud. Whereas with dinos, there are hundreds of reputable scientists reinforcing the
existence of dinosaurs. Such a comparison, of dulce/lacerta being as provable as dinosaurs, has no basis.
Feel free to consider me a disinfo agent if you like, but I will never knowingly and purposefully put out false information. I will state what I
BELIEVE to be false, but in order to be a disinfo agent, you'd have to KNOW the truth, and then put out false info that goes against it. I do not
KNOW if reptoids exist or not...but the evidence for it isn't really there in my opinion. My opinion could change, but again, I'd have to see the
evidence for it.
For example, I originally believed the Roswell story of a Mogul crash. The evidence I saw at the time supported it well. This was prior to even
cursory digging on the subject of course (and way before coming here). But, the deeper I went into it, the more and more things didn't add up. If
it was truly a Mogul balloon, the military response would not have been what it was. That right there was the key to seeing that the story was bogus.
Not the testimony, etc. of witnesses, but the sheer logic that what happened didn't fit what was claimed.