Holy Smokes! ConservaRag WorldNetDaily is going NUTS over GOP/Porn Connection

Really, this is only remotely interesting because WorldNetDaily.com tends to be such a Republican lapdog and Democratic attack machine. But the real agenda behind WorldNetDaily's posturing is more than clear in the slurry of articles they just can't seem to stop writing on porn star Mary Carey's GOP fundraising.

Indeed, there's something about Mary.


She's singlehandedly seperating the "Patriotically Correct" from the "Christian Correct" and the GOP's unholy alliance of Big Money and Big Jesus is splitting at the seams over her.

Their recent headlines:

White House Won't Address Porn Star Dining With Bush
Not even a "President" Bush on that one. They are pissed and relate the snub in detail.

Here is the dialogue from today's White House press briefing:

WND: What is the president thinking about the propriety of the Republican Party accepting $5,000 from a pornographer and the example that is set for the moral climate of this nation, and I have a follow-up.
McCLELLAN: I think you need to direct those questions to the committee itself.

WND: Among the evangelical protestant leaders that so helped the president win re-election, the Rev. Don Wildmon of the American Family Association said, "The Republicans need to go public with an explanation. Just doing nothing is the worse thing they can do." And my question: Do you think tomorrow night none of the TV cameras at all will focus on Mary Carey, who was arrested in Tacoma last month for publicly touching herself in a sexual manner?

McCLELLAN: You've asked this question before –

WND: No, no, no – this is a new question. It's newly worded –

McCLELLAN: It's another question to direct to the event's sponsor.

WND: But do you agree with [Wildmon] or not?

McClellan then called on another reporter in the room.

Bush Dinner Porn Star: I'm a Praying Christian
No sarcasm in that one.

Porn Industry Pushing GOP Fundraiser

The President and the Porn Star
A scolding editorial.

When asked by WND's White House correspondent Les Kinsolving about the attendance of this pair at the Republican event, White House spokesman Scott McClellan played dumb, claiming he had not yet looked that far ahead on the president's schedule.

It's time for the Republicans to give this matter some serious thought, rather than brushing it off or laughing it off.

Do Bush and the Republicans justify accepting money from pornographers for their campaigns?

Do Bush and the Republicans understand that appearing with a porn star and a pornographer gives them and their criminal industry credibility?

Do Bush and the Republicans think they are setting a good example for the moral climate of our nation by meeting with these people?

Maybe you don't think this is an important issue. I do. I think presidents are defined by the kind of people with whom they meet.

Bush Event Organizers Okay With Porn Star Attendance

Some choice reader quotes:

"It hurts for self-respecting citizens to watch their leaders play the fool for influence ... Let's not let those who abuse their bodies, and our children's future, buy a voice in this administration." (K.R.)

"Mr. Bush brings many virtues to his job. But, he refuses to lead on important moral issues. When Janet Jackson outraged Super Bowl viewers, he professed to be asleep and ducked the issue. ... [T]here is a vacuum of leadership on issues important to this country. Yes, Mr. Bush can and should speak to the issue." (David Wallace)

"Look how far the Republican Party has come in just two decades: from Reagan's Commission on Pornography, under then-Attorney-general Edwin Meese in 1985, to today, porn stars invited to a White House fund-raising gala. The leadership of the Republican Party has lost its mind." (Brian Hudgins)

"Basically politicians are prostitutes anyway. Why should there be a problem associating with porn stars and entrepreneurs?" (Ken Zwick)

"If you stop and think about it, you can see where Bush might be her hero. I can't think of anyone who has screwed more people in such a short period of time. Especially the veterans." (Fred Perry)

"Why wouldn't they use porn stars at a fund-raiser? Porn stars are about 10 steps above politicians. At least they are honest about what they do. The real question is why would the porn stars want to degrade themselves?" (Bob Bolton)

Bush Snubs Crowe; But Not Porn Star
Actor's arrest cost him dinner date, but actress' bust doesn't scare GOP


Bush Fete With Porn Star to Raise $23 Million for GOP
McClellan refuses to comment on propriety of tonight's event

Really as you see the same outraged right wing preachers and religious leaders quoted over and over, you begin to get the idea. The religious right is furious at the economic right because they just figured out they got played for power and don't matter one bit. You can also hear the voice of the editor throughout as he makes his point. Basically it's that Arab-American, Super Christian and WND Editor Joseph Farrah doesn't like porn. You got that!

And the Religious Right wonders why they're called the American Taliban.

[edit on 15-6-2005 by RANT]

White House sex has come out of the closet. No, I am not saying that anybody is doing anything, but folks in the SEX industry are welcomed in Washington, D.C.
I am old enough to remember when sex between unmarrieds was dirty, and Politicians in the USA avoided PUBLIC appearances with anybody in that Industry.
I suppose that by trying to reach out to more Americans, the "Conservative" White House must welcome all with open arms. The Porn Industry must be making much more money than I ever imagined. The White House Visit has brought RESPECTABILITY to it.
The Religious Right is upset, but I have to ask "Why?" Didn't the Leader and founder of Christianity, Jesus, spend time with Tax Collectors and other "Sinners"?

Do Bush and the Republicans justify accepting money from pornographers for their campaigns?

Do Bush and the Republicans understand that appearing with a porn star and a pornographer gives them and their criminal industry credibility?

The religious right has been totally hoodwinked. Probably only because they so wanted to believe this president is the Christian they've been praying for for so long.

He is not. It's all lipservice. He worships at the alter of the military industrial complex. It's no more complicated than that. That is why he takes money from a porn star and allows a gay male escort (who is seriously and sickeningly confused) into White House Press conferences.

What I STILL want to know is who "Jeff Gannon's" White House benficiary is. That question has never been answered. The reason: he was suckin sumbunny's "member," in all probability.

[edit on 6/16/05 by EastCoastKid]

Originally posted by EastCoastKid
The religious right has been totally hoodwinked. Probably only because they so wanted to believe this president is the Christian they've been praying for for so long.

From The President's Prayer Breakfast Sermon this Morning

"We're working to support and defend the sanctity of marriage and to ensure that the most vulnerable Americans are welcomed in life and protected in love. (Applause.)"

The day gay partners entering a monogamous relationship in Maryland break up more straight "Christian" marriages in Texas than pornography, I'll vote Republican.

And way to protect those teen runaway's from the sex industry el Presidente. The most vulnerable Americans don't really know "love" until they've been trained by Republican donors in a skin flick, right?

It's just absurd. Completely absurd. :shk:

[edit on 16-6-2005 by RANT]

Best part is, a porn star at a Dem meeting is no big deal.
A black person, or a gay person, or a Arabic, Asian, Jewish, Hispanic, all no problem.

But get them at a GOP Meet? All hell breaks loose. Even more funny they are offended when they are called out on what they are, an all White Christian Party. No Elected blacks, asians, hispanics, gays, Arabic, none.

In the Seante there are 350% more minorities in the dem party then the GOP. 600% more if you don't count women as minorities, since the GOP has none then.

Originally posted by James the Lesser
Best part is, a porn star at a Dem meeting is no big deal.
A black person, or a gay person, or a Arabic, Asian, Jewish, Hispanic, all no problem.

But get them at a GOP Meet? All hell breaks loose. Even more funny they are offended when they are called out on what they are, an all White Christian Party. No Elected blacks, asians, hispanics, gays, Arabic, none.

In the Seante there are 350% more minorities in the dem party then the GOP. 600% more if you don't count women as minorities, since the GOP has none then.

Hehehe...big tent party, huh? Just big enough to hold the Fortune 500 and the Falwell Fundies, I guess.

Originally posted by James the Lesser
No Elected blacks, asians, hispanics, gays, Arabic, none.

Oh come on now! The GOP has, er had, Congressman J.C. Watts! And and and Colin Powell! They're black!

Keyword, HAD!!! Also, Powell wasn't elected, he was placed in power by 4 dif. presidents. Although, with the latest he was forced to resign for using his brain and not being a puppet like Rice.

All I have to say is.. and on him!

I saw him and Watts on TV recently STILL talkin up the party line! What IS WRONG with those guys?!

Well, probably made a deal, they won't be executed/sent to concentration camps when the GOP declares martial law for being both black and smart, as long as they speak like mindless puppets. I can see it, John McCain might want to start being a puppet to for the GOP "Rapture" is coming and if he doesn't go back to being a good puppet he will be going to Auswitch, I mean Little Rock.(Saying Little Rock would be a concentration camp, not Auswitch is a city in America)