It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I proved this to myself last night using 5 magnets to create linear motion. I simply took 4 old T.V. magnets that are cylindrical , and took a cylindrical refrigerator magnet and mounted it on two buttons with glue. Then I lined the 4 larger magnets up in a line in different positions .
If I start the refrigerator magnet off at an offset angle it will flip causing it to roll forward past all the 4 larger magnets, when they are correctly positioned.
Look im not replying to you if youre going to keep at this. It slows down the whole process.
Youre wrong. accept it.
Instead of simply arguing, get some magnets and do the thing yourself.
Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
>>> I proved this to myself last night using 5 magnets to create linear motion. I simply took 4 old T.V. magnets that are cylindrical , and took a cylindrical refrigerator magnet and mounted it on two buttons with glue. Then I lined the 4 larger magnets up in a line in different positions .
If I start the refrigerator magnet off at an offset angle it will flip causing it to roll forward past all the 4 larger magnets, when they are correctly positioned.
Originally posted by lost_shaman
I'm really glad that you asked!!!
Let me ask this if I say no will you reconsider your flawed mathematics?
Simple , so I will provide you with a magnetic arrangement that = more than a net gain of Zero. Of Course we both acknowlege no permanemt magnet will hold it polarity indefinenitely.
Will it make me world famous? Likely not , it's too simple.
Many PM inventors these days are tinkering with magnets on wheels. Why the fascination with magnetism? I think it's because most people, even those who have had physics and engineering courses, still are a bit mystified by how magnets work, so they are less likely to see flaws in a magnetic engine design.
The behavior of magnets is often fascinating to observe, as they exert force on each other, and on metallic objects. One is tempted to think that their movement is due to their "stored" magnetic energy, and if you could design a device to turn that stored energy into useful work, you'd have achieved, if not perpetual motion, at least something very useful. Such is the allure of magnets to perpetual motion seekers. Even if they understand that magnet internal energy is not being extracted, they suppose that the magnets are somehow a conduit of energy stored in the vacuum, or somewhere else.
The magnetic energy stored in a magnet is a paltry amount. It may easily be "extracted" by sharp blows to the magnet, or by heating the magnet. When you do this, the magnet isn't magnetized anymore. In the absence of such processes, the motion of magnets in a device in no way uses or depelets their stored magnetic energy. Such motions are entirely the result of the initial mechanical energy you give to the magnets when you place them in position relative to others.
And let me guess what happened next.....did it stop?
You realise that you aren't just telling me I'm wrong, but every mainstream physicist and engineer on the planet? And you want me just to accept that? OK, you're right and everyone else is wrong.
Originally posted by Shadow88
I dont know how many times i can say, ITS NOT BREAKING ANY LAWS, just bending them/stretching them a little further than conventional parameters.
Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
Originally posted by Shadow88
I dont know how many times i can say, ITS NOT BREAKING ANY LAWS, just bending them/stretching them a little further than conventional parameters.
You can't bend or stretch a law; the law is either correct and physical phenomena must adhere to it, or it is wrong. There is no in between.
Have you had a look at the links I posted above? I would be interested in your comments on their debunking of the shielded PMM such as you are suggesting to build.
You are correct in one respect though, if you do manage to build such a device I (and many others much smarter than me) will be wrong. I will then eat not only my hat, but the hat stand as well.
Originally posted by Shadow88
I need MULAH!!! damn santa....stealin all my mulah....lol
So um......I will start construction around Jan/Feb?
Originally posted by Frosty
Well, not all gases obey the ideal gas law.
Your first post (in this thread) was in June
Of the 1.6 billion people in the world who have no access (to electricity), more than 30 percent live in sub-Saharan Africa.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Mozambique’s Cahora Bassa hydropower plant has an installation capacity of 2,075MW but “90 percent of people have no electricity.”
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Electricity and drinking water supplies have been cut off, and both towns face food shortages.
Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
And why do you choose to believe they might have worked? For a start any of them could simply demonstrate their machine to James Randi and win a million dollars. If they worked that is. Any idea why no one has chosen to do this?
Well the principle is bunk, and the machines don't work either.
Well as their is no evidence of a conspiricy, massive or otherwise,
I shall assume they are all lying (or misguided in some cases).
Can you show me any evidence of the "powers that be" somehow interferring with any of the "free energy" machine makers?
Aside from anything else the "powers that be" here in the UK are desperately looking for ways to wean us off our dependence on Middle East oil. They would jump at a perpetual motion machine.
If any of these "inventors" could demonstrate over unity in their machines not only would they take a $1 million from James Randi but they would have investors throwing money at them.
Don't really know what you mean by this.
Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
As one of the "naysayers", I'm not saying don't try - it will be an interesting project and you will probably get some useful skills and knowledge out of it. Just don't expect to build anything than a normal magnetic motor.
People have been building magnetic motors since 1821 and none of them have ever achieved over-unity. What is it about your device that is different from all the ones that have ever been made?
That's not really evidence though is it? It's just rumour, and pretty vague at that.
Originally posted by StellarX
Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
And why do you choose to believe they might have worked? For a start any of them could simply demonstrate their machine to James Randi and win a million dollars. If they worked that is. Any idea why no one has chosen to do this?
A million dollars is not a whole lot of money unless your thinking very very small.
Who says Randi is serious and will not just use the chance to destroy the machine as have happened to many of these groups?
The principles is just fine if you cared to look at them.
Why are you even on this forum?
Well as their is no evidence of a conspiricy, massive or otherwise,
And you would know how? What in your mind shows there is no conspiracy to make cheaper energy sources impossible for the average man to exploit?
Why would governments want people to gain more independence with massively cheaper energy that they can each generate in their own home free from any state networks? You think that is not cause enough for any government to try destroy this technology? If you believe that you have no place on this forum imo.
It's not on the market and the scienctific basis has been established in sciene theory since 1880 at the latest. There is obviously other evidence but what else do you need to know other than that?
Many governments are allready using these machines ( Russia/China/Brazil and two others not mentioned) in secret weapon systems but they know very well that it's not something you can let people have while keeping them dependent.
Capitalism is based on dependence and a cycle where people need to earn money to heat/cool or feed themselves. The moment this cycle is undermined the whole thing will eventually come crashing down. Investors are watching their bottem line and not one of them will ever benefit from this technology in the long run. Just follow the logic.
How will they make profit if every person could afford their own little power station in their back yards?
These self same power stations are allready tapping energy from the vacuum and it's all they have ever done. All fossil fuels ( or anything else) ever does is create the dipoles from wich energy then freely flows from the vacuum. All the fossil fuels we have ever burned up never added any single watt of power to our power grids.
Originally posted by Shadow88
Look i know how to solve this. I have said time and time again only this.
Believe in my actions not in my words.
When we have proof, physical proof, you will see. If not you'll be correct until proven wrong. Until then, all sides are on shaky ground.
Originally posted by Shadow88
And i also notice postings hasnt posted anything. You've probably put him off.
Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
posted earlier:
The Classic Magnetic Shield Engine
and why it doesn't work:
Debunked