It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

bio-anarchist?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 11 2005 @ 04:58 PM
link   
Is there such a thing as a theory as bio-anarchist? What I mean by that is a biology-anarchist, which means humans have been genetically made to be good people by taking out all their bad genes out that make them do all the bad things, so we don't need laws to govern them and to keep them order because they will be good people and good to each and live in harmony. What are the ethics in this and does this go against the whole anarchist theory because they are made to be good? what are your opinions?




posted on Jun, 14 2005 @ 09:57 AM
link   
It's hard to isolate the part of the Human that causes them to do such things that are wrong; in some respect the Nazi Party tried to do this with the Master Race. They assumed that the problems that were being caused were because of the poor, Jews, Blacks and homosexuals and by destoying these people they would only allow those who were good to live.

The main problem with any such theory is the fact there is no "gene" that will make someone commit a crime. Normally it is the fact they are living in poverty or the actions of their parents and peers that force someone into the spiral of crime . For Example if someone's mother was a drug addict, they grow up thinking taking drugs is O.K. due to the way in which they become socialized this then repeats. I remember an interesting T.V. show which followed the lives of ten abused children a smiliar thing happened they all were abused and then abused people.

But there is a way to "stop" crime. You need to get people out of poverty, you need to make people understand they are all equal and they need to fear what will happen to those who break the rules of the society. The Governments need to push a much more active role so people do not have to turn to drugs, crime, etc, and can live without having to do such things. It's more about the socialisation of someone when they are a child which results in how they act towards others.



posted on Jun, 17 2005 @ 01:18 PM
link   
You can't take the bad out of the good! There will always be apart of you that is bad.....it's just apart of life.



posted on Jul, 21 2005 @ 11:34 PM
link   
expriences can make your good or bad and then again it depends on which side your standing doesnt it?

as for an antrichrist. I wouldn't worry too much about that



posted on Jul, 22 2005 @ 11:30 AM
link   
But when there is a lot less of a need to do something "bad" people will not do it.

A lot of people do not go and steal food because they want to do it but because they need to eat.



posted on Dec, 29 2005 @ 10:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Odium
But when there is a lot less of a need to do something "bad" people will not do it.

A lot of people do not go and steal food because they want to do it but because they need to eat.


so I guess John Gasey just needed to not NEED to kill children and it would have been all good..

or Dahmer just needed a better grocery store.

this is of course a smart ass comment..

thing is.. what it gets down to is why are people hungry, what are they doing to not be hungry, where does the responsibility lay?



posted on Dec, 29 2005 @ 11:27 AM
link   
Mr. Bunny, you are deliberately changing the level of deviance to make a point.

Now, let me see what you are trying to argue? That because they are stealing they are not trying to get out of the position they are in? Have you ever lived in one of these areas?

I used to live in Wolverhampton, in one of the worst areas where the average person is a drug addict. I know someone, who lives there now and works over 60hrs a week. They can’t go to College, they can’t finish their education and they can barely afford to live. The house I live in now, is a two bedroom house in an area classed as “poverty stricken” - it’s not as bad as where I used to live. But for this place, in an area classed as that I have to pay £700 a month rent, with bills, utilities, etc, I am well over £1000 a month.

If I didn’t have people supporting me, I would stand no chance of getting out of the situation these people live in the problem is they do not have this opportunities. I was lucky, always have been - a lot of my friends are well off, and were able to support me and still do. Those who do not have this? They are screwed.

I know people, who wish they could work and get enough off of the welfare system so they could eat but they can’t. They can’t go through education as well as work, so there is no chance of them improving their situation. They are trapped and it falls to those of us who are not, to help them out and to help remove these crimes of need. I work in the criminal justice field now, I meant even more people now who are mothers of 3 whose husband left them and the CSA do not get money from him they wish they didn’t have to steal but they do.

So while we waste billions on military spending, we allow the other sectors to go to hell and allow crime to spiral up and increase.



posted on Dec, 29 2005 @ 02:07 PM
link   
and that is a perfectly good example of situations where help is needed.

now if I may add my own.

I lived on the streets on Albuquerque NM a desert town a the base of several mountain ranges elevation of just over a mile. Hot days and freezing nights.

I slep in parks and when possible broke in to the steam tunnels under the university to stay warm. Slowly i worked my butt out of that situation by not doing drugs, not wallowing a pool of self pity and alcohol. Many people around me chose that route.

Now, several years later I have a good job and my own place. I do however have the joy of hearing my perfectly healthy neighbors laugh about running up massive debt knowing they can just declare bankrupsy, the fact that "section 8" is making they live in this "crappy POS neighborhood" smoke pot and bitch that they are not getting enough help from the government now that they have a 3rd kid.

I know there are people out there who need help.. but I would argue that there are more who simply want things handed to them, people who abuse the system so they don't have to make an effort, or steal what is easer to take than it is to earn.

These are the people who make it harder to help those who really need it and that is really sad...

We should just kill everyone on earth... that will solve all the social and political issues.



posted on Dec, 29 2005 @ 02:11 PM
link   
Mr. Bunny, that's the problem - people abuse it.

However, to remove things on the basis of this is wrong. It is unfair to harm those who use welfare to get out of the situation, we just need the system to be taken care of better.

The problem is, money isn't given to key areas such as the Tax Office. In the U.K. they can only go through 20% of the returns, the others never get checked adn so on and so fourth.



posted on Dec, 29 2005 @ 02:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Odium
Mr. Bunny, that's the problem - people abuse it.

However, to remove things on the basis of this is wrong. It is unfair to harm those who use welfare to get out of the situation, we just need the system to be taken care of better.

The problem is, money isn't given to key areas such as the Tax Office. In the U.K. they can only go through 20% of the returns, the others never get checked adn so on and so fourth.


Yes, people tend to screw things up for everyone. Thats why I hate people for the most part. They are sick, devisive, selfish little roaches.

That is also why I am trying to get into a field where I will have as little contact with the human race as possible. Field research in plant biology.




top topics



 
0

log in

join