It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GodAtum
Under what law did they do this?
(4) "Neglect" includes:
(B) the following acts or omissions by a person:
(i) placing a child in or failing to remove a child from a situation that a reasonable person would realize requires judgment or actions beyond the child's level of maturity, physical condition, or mental abilities and that results in bodily injury or a substantial risk of immediate harm to the child;
(ii) failing to seek, obtain, or follow through with medical care for a child, with the failure resulting in or presenting a substantial risk of death, disfigurement, or bodily injury or with the failure resulting in an observable and material impairment to the growth, development, or functioning of the child;
www.familyrightsfoundation.org...
(b) The refusal of a parent, guardian, or managing or possessory conservator of a child to administer or consent to the administration of a psychotropic drug to the child, or to consent to any other psychiatric or psychological treatment of the child, does not by itself constitute neglect of the child unless the refusal to consent:
(1) presents a substantial risk of death, disfigurement, or bodily injury to the child; or
(2) has resulted in an observable and material impairment to the growth, development, or functioning of the child.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
An amber alert for this child, like she was kidnapped by a pedophile or axe murderer?
The couple, members of the Church of God, have said they oppose blood transfusions unless they were from Katie's mother. But the couple's attorney, Daniel Horne, said religion wasn't at issue in the fight over cancer treatment.
None of you normally intelligent people flapping their gums have bothered to Google the parents name to really check into this story! You YAK, YAK, YAK, about how bad the parents are, that's all!
To the original poster, check more than one source before stating 'facts'. Several doctors were contacted BEFORE the alert was given.
These parents belong to the same bunch that knock on your door on Saturday morning and try to convert you to their beliefs. In this case they DONT BELIEVE IN BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS unless it is from a parent. They are nuts!
If any of you 'DOCTORS' out there would bother to check into this a little deeper then you would understand the need for the alert and realise just how wacko the parents really are. If it is left up to them there is a very good chance this girl will die.
No I wont post links because I have better things to do than post links for people that dont bother to check out a story properly when posting it as NEWS under ATSNN.
Originally posted by victor was right
THE GIRL IS MATURE ENOUGH TO DECIDE; end of the story.
Speaking Thursday on NBC's "Today" show, Michele Wernecke said her daughter's illness is unique and should be treated as such.
"I think they should treat her for what her body calls for and not standard protocol. Nobody will look at that," she said. "Not every cancer is the same. Nobody understands that. Her body is not standard, and her cancer is not standard."
The couple, members of the Church of God, have said they oppose blood transfusions unless they were from Katie's mother. But the couple's attorney, Daniel Horne, said religion wasn't at issue in the fight over cancer treatment.
Rather, they believe doctors haven't been upfront about Katie's care and have not answered all their questions about the side effects of the radiation.
"This issue is about parental rights, not about religious rights," Horne said. "They just want to be informed of her treatment. They want to be involved in this."
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
I think this might be about religion also, but to my mind, that doesn't matter nearly so much as the underlying question that needs to be answered. Does the definition of abuse overrule freedom of religion?
In some cases it's an easy answer, if some wacko thinks flogging his 8 year old niece gets him closer to god, he is probably not fit to be a parent.
If someone believes the flu shot will make their child sick, and say no, does that make them abusive?
Regardless of their beliefs, don't you think they should have the final say regarding what the doctors do to their child?
So is the FBI going to stake out the snake handler Christians and arrest them for allowing their children to play with rattlesnakes?
I for one would not want my child to undergo radiation therapy. I've SEEN, with my own eyes, the damage done. I watched my mother suffer, and there is no way in hell I'd do that to my child. Now keep in mind, I'm not some religious wacko, I'm just a hard working American citizen who knows there are worse things than death.