posted on Jul, 7 2005 @ 03:11 PM
No actually Warthog I am not trashing anything. What I am doing is trying to ask you simple qestions on how and what you base your statements of fact
on (or at least what you yourself claim to be fact). That is what this entire website is based on, the search for various truths on various subjects.
Your statement about me being put on global ignore is ridicilous as i am simply asking you questions that you seem to never answer. You yourself
though were put on global ignore because of your statements on this site of calling people who question you "debunkers" and "disinfo. agents".
Only very few people on this entire site make the kind of claims you do on what the "truth" is that is going in the world and then offer only
stories they have read on the net as their "proof". That is NO proof. The only proof you offer is that an author somewhere actully wrote a story.
Other then YOUR claims on what is going on in the world, there are then a multitude of other claims or "theories" of what is going on in the world
and all of them are different from your claims. So, people like me, who need more then "stories" on the net, ask people like you how you can come on
these threads and make the claims that you do when you have no real proof other then you say "Well, gee, I read the Lacerta Files or the Dulce report
so it must be true. How in the world do you not know that the Lacerta and Dulce stories are true and not just stories on the net?
You talk about "witnesses". Where are all these "witnesses" that say the Lacerta and Dulce reports are true. There were no witnesses to the
Lacerta interview or supposed interview, so how can you say it is factual and true and not just some guy making it all up?
Then to try and "validate" your claims on "reptilians" you say things like the Bible says that "reptilians and greys" are planning a fake 2nd
coming, which it does not say that. I then ask you to simply show me where it does say that and you come back calling me a "debunker" instead. You
do not even make sense. Then you say that the Hindu religion says that we are all a computer generated sim and i ask you were it says that in the
Hindu religion and again you come back with nothing. Why? Probably because the Hindu religion does not say that at all. How could it since computers
did not even exist when the Hindu religion was started.
Then you go so far as to say that God is a machine. Other then the Matrix movies, what do you base that statement on? Are you actually saying that the
Matrix movies were telling us the truth of how things are? Well, then I guess we could say that any Sci Fi movies are telling us the truth of the way
things are. That statement does not even make sense, as i pointed out before, if God is a machine then who built the machine.
I believe that there may be some "spiritual" truth to the main message behind the Matrix movies, but to say you know for a fact that God is a
machine is insane. How do you know this Warthog?
You say you talked to a guy over the net who says reptilians have put implants in him and you just go and believe him??? Why did you not ask the guy
why he has not just gone to get the implants x-rayed and removed so that he could prove to us all and the world that it is true?
When you were placed on global ignore, you actually wrote me a U2U blaming ME for YOU being put on global ignore. Do you actually think the moderators
put you on global ignore because of ME? I am just another guy on this site like you.
If you can show me where any of the above statements you have made are actually written in the Bible or the Hindu religion or in ANY respected,
reconized, time tested texts, then why not just show us all and prove me wrong and shut me up?
I already know you will not be able to. Instead you will make your wild claims of what the "truth" is and then when people like me (which is the
majority of people, even the majority of people on this site) ask you where your proof of your claims is, you'll not provide proof and instead call
us "debunkers" and "disinfo. agents".
Could everything you are saying be true? Yea, it could all be true. But then so could a lot of the "theories" or stories that have nothing to do
with what you say. So how can you say the rest of us are basically fools because we need real proof of your claims before we agree that you are
presenting us with the "truth". How do you know the other theories or stories out there are actually not the truth?
How in the world can anyone state that the Lacerta files are fact and actually happened? A guy writes a story that he interviewed a female reptilian,
yet he offers no pictures and there were no witnesses to this interview and YOU call everyone who does not believe it "debunkers".
Warthog, what if Anne Rice wrote "interview with the vampire" on the net or even in a book and claimed it to be true (instead of what it was,
fiction). Are you telling me YOU would then believe that her story of her interview with a vampire proves then that there are vampires just because
she says so and just because she says her story is true?
[edit on 7-7-2005 by GREGNOW]