Originally posted by pepsi78
What is next , shortage of light? Who invents all this stuff anyway.
There is no possible way to run out of water, I can obtain water from thin air.
The question isn't so much "is there water around", because of course, there is. The question is more about how long your body can go without
water before dying.
The question is not about supply, it's about demand, but more importantly uninterrupted demand, that is, if water is not available for even a short
period of time, there will be problems, and perhaps death. So while you are right of course, and you can extract water from the air, you must agree
that your permission to do anything with the air or the water, is dependent upon the government, or whatever gang is running your town.
I think the question is more about control. As I walk through Wal-Mart I see a very, very tiny "food and water" section with little comically-small
shelved bits of non-foods there and overly-plasticized little bottles of water that say, "Nestle" on them.
nestle_targets_aquifers_and_springs_in_
new_england_for_bottled_water/
IRS to Go After US-held Swiss Bank Account
Records
Sunday July 6, 2008
According to a court statement by a former UBS banker, the Swiss bank holds about $20 billion in "undeclared" accounts for [THE RICHEST]
U.S. taxpayers.
Under the law, all U.S. taxpayers are required to report to the IRS all financial accounts in a foreign country if the total value of the accounts
exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. Willfully failing to report such funds can result in a penalty of up to 50 percent of the amount
in the account at the time of the violation.
Italics mine. So whilst they drain/redistribute our water, they also hide 30 billion USD so the richest of their collaborators can avoid taxes.
Nice. Meanwhile most Americans are being hounded by the IRS for sums of few thousands of dollars. Also, both rich and poor are enjoying bottled
water and also the fine television programs. Instead of a new Boston tea party, maybe we need a Boston chocolate and water party?
Anyway, mid-America, also there is an issue recently with some Colorado authority saying that people couldn't collect rainwater due to mosquitoes
(potentially not actually) and the reason for this issue is because the authorities up there have already coined the value of the water before it even
condenses in the air.
Collecting Water From Sky: Illegal
What's funny is that these people will probably try to say they are trying to protect the runoff and not have it redistributed but that is a total
lie because the runoff and rivers are far more affected by corporate irresponsibility than by citizens trying to act pro-actively. Any authority
which promotes any anti-human sort of thinking, is going to fail, imo.
Let's all protect the rivers and groundwaters of America. I have posted here about the East Coast of the US and what foreign corp(se)orations want
our water and hopefully they'll be prevented. Then about the middle of America and the county authorities efforts against the people there. Also
there is water protection happening on the West side of the country as well, but in this case, the results might be painful, but are actually
beneficial. Potentially Los Angelenos may have to water their lawns less so as to preserve the salmon, the rivers, and the waters of California
North. I think that is a good thing, because if one moves to conserve (or re-introduce) the salmon to the Trinity, Feather and Sacramento rivers up
north, then one creates the salmon as a sort of symbolic living soldier, who protects the river.
This issue is dear to my heart, and will always be: Protecting the California water supply from corporations and/or terrorists and/or corrupt
authorities and/or any and all threats, is the job of the
world, and that includes all the people who eat the yummy cherries and almonds and
apples, etc, etc which the California waterways produce. Most of it goes to Asia of course because they'll pay fifty bucks per cherry over there
--Hey that's yer free market for ya, but still, the point is that protecting the waters of the world benefits all who are IN the world. I am so glad
to see that there is movement at the top, to protect the Fountainhead of California. Let no Gold Rush ever again affect the Sacramento River or its
tributaries, be it corporate or otherwise.
As long as the fish and the wildlife are protected, a protected river and water table will literally feed billions of people. If unprotected, the
opposite might also apply.
