Soon to be Worldwide Water Shortage??, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 30-11-2005 @ 09:30 PM by worldwatcher
I've meaning to come back to this thread but time always seems to get into the way...well I'm making an attempt now...so there!

November 2005
Scientists Say Water Shortages Will Result From Global Warming

Scientists at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography predict there will be a water shortage due to global warming in as little as 20 years in the United States. Their study shows water supplies from glaciers and snow reserves will dwindle as more of the polar icecap melts.

Scientists say the timeline for loss of water in other parts of the world will vary, but it will not happen overnight.

"For other places in the world like Peru, probably sooner, and yet other places like China, maybe a little bit later,” said Dr. Barnett. “So it's not something you're going to wake up to in the morning and say, ‘Oh my God, we're out of water,’ it's not going to happen like that, it will just be slow."


Global warming to cause water shortage: study

Liberia; Water Shortage!

Water shortage panics China city

New Zealand; Wine growers face water shortage

June 2005
Rural China in clean water crisis

March 2005
China warns of water pollution

I could keep going but I rather you do the research for yourself to see that water will cost more than gas. Just google "water shortage" and see what you find.

So what do we do?

Would you be okay with weather manipulation now if you know that we will have to rely on collected rainfall for our water source? Should the government make it rain so that we don't run out of water?

Chemtrails, Haarp, scalar weather manipulation might be too far out there if the "They" already know about this water shortage that the majority of humanity is not aware of....



[edit on 11-30-2005 by worldwatcher]


reply posted on 2-12-2005 @ 10:24 PM by Munro_DreadGod
As was stated earlier why dont we just invest in technology to solve the problem, which will help bring down sea levels too.

Quote from website.

'In the wealthier countries of the world, one way to increase the supply of fresh water is to build a desalination plant, which will remove the salt from seawater. The basic technique is simple: the salt water must pass through a filter in order to become fresh. But this simple process requires a great deal of energy. To get fresh water from the sea in sufficient quantities you need to be able to provide and pay for the fossil fuels or other energy sources, such as nuclear power, that the desalination plant requires. These costs are quite high, particularly when added to the costs of building, staffing and maintaining the plant. Since burning fossil fuels and producing nuclear energy present, beyond their financial burdens, risks to human health and the environment, building a conventional desalination plant becomes an even more difficult decision.

In the developing countries, the costs of building and running a desalination plant are prohibitive. These are the same countries whose citizens bear the highest burden from water-borne diseases, and where the supply of fresh water for irrigation is most needed to help alleviate hunger. Even in wealthier lands, in areas where the population density is low and where revenues from taxes are not substantial enough, a conventional desalination plant is too expensive.

In all countries of the world, there are coastal areas that are effectively uninhabitable because of the lack of fresh water; making such areas inhabitable would relieve overpopulation and shortages of agricultural land worldwide. A method of desalination that is less expensive and easier to maintain can not only help avert disease and provide water for drinking and irrigation in the world�s poorer countries, but it can benefit the wealthier nations as well.'

www.solutions-site.org...

When the price of water reaches a certain level you will see this happening, we only invest in this sort of thing to make a profit.


reply posted on 19-3-2006 @ 02:59 AM by Muaddib
Originally posted by Indy
Well said Majic. And even if they said "worst flood ever" would it really be the worst flood ever? Or just the worst flood in recorded history which in reality only means since like 1880 or so when the NWS was founded. I am unsure of the exact year.
.....................
Personally I would describe the dust bowl era as more alarming than what we call global warming today and we certainly survived that.


I think you are tlaking about the explosion of the Krakatoa volcano, in 1883 which started making up to 100 m waves, but which attenuated rapidly and reached islands and coastlines in many places around the world at 40-50m high waves.

There are stories that the waves travelled all around the world, of course the height of the waves continued attenuating and weren't as high when it reached the other side of the world.

Here is a link with some info on that event, which were actually several explosions from Krakatoa.

www.drgeorgepc.com...

These days we have several possible scenarios which could result in waves higher than those that the explosions Krakatoa made back in 1883.

I am talking about "La Cumbre Vieja" volcano in the Canary islands, which at any moment, from today to 1,000 years from now, part of this volcano could break away, and cause a massive tsunami that will devastate parts of the eastern seaboard in the U.S. and other countries, it will also erase life from any islands on it's way to the U.S.

There is also some overdue underwater earthquakes in the Pacific and the Atlantic, close to the U.S. which would also cause a lot of damage to the U.S. as well as South America, Central America and islands in both oceans.

I am really not looking forward to something like this to happen.

Ok, back to the topic, and I apologize for going off tangent.

We will see in the not so distant future water wars.

I believe that in order to make sure that we don't run out of water, several countries around the world should unite and put to good use some of the icebergs that we can still find at the poles, before global warming melts them all, or most of them.

Anyways, there should be an international pact to build huge watertanks around the world and melt as much water from icebergs as is possible in those tanks. Of course this would take cooperation from most countries in the world, as well as billions of dollars. Even then it would take years for a plan like this one to work, and btw imo this plan shouldn't be placed on the hands of one country alone like some people like to do.

Anyways, with the way things are going now, i doubt this would ever happen anytime soon.


[edit on 19-3-2006 by Muaddib]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
  Posted 10 days ago with 176 member flags
Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
  Posted 18 days ago with 146 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 7 days ago with 135 member flags
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
  Posted 7 days ago with 121 member flags
6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
  Posted 11 days ago with 108 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
  Posted 8 days ago with 87 member flags
CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 75 member flags
Pictures from the Aurora lightshow
  Posted 19 days ago with 73 member flags