It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Fry2
A Howitzer would do nicely....
The UN can't take military action without the consent of the secuirty council, thus they can not enforce any such law on America without America's consent
Didn't they do something like that in Nazi Germany?
What they'll probably do--and are doing--is making sure that school shootings, etc., get all the publicity they can
This process is the same as what they did in Great Britain during the periods of 1994 to 1997 till the Labour Government disarmed us and it seems to now be happening in America as well.
Well at the moment there has been an increase in the number of violent crimes involving guns that are gaining massive publication by the media
the US gun culture (or cult, if you will) is one of the weirdest things about the
As the October issue of the NRA magazine, "American Rifleman," phrases it, the UN is "preparing a binding international treaty that could transform your Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms into empty words. Because if ratified by the United States, it would instantly become domestic federal law."
The UN and IANSA are most assuredly pursuing actions to achieve regulations over small-arms proliferation, Peters says. But "the thing that the NRA sees as so threatening to them is something that most people in the world see as a completely reasonable level of regulation." IANSA and other such "civil society" organizations have been working through the UN "to try to get some international norms established," she says.