Actually... why couldn't somebody just mount a micro video camera to a radio controlled glider or airplane and send it into the base? Transmit the image back to ya or broadcast live over the internet as it happens.

A UCAV in some respects if you will


I would be amazed if they could take out a tiny glider or airplane like that say during the night..... hell even if they could I'm sure you could get some really cool images before they did

Land on their runway... like hey, whats up haha

[edit on 26-10-2007 by zarlaan]

Originally posted by iksmodnad
More pictures:

Most of these are access denied.


Mod Edit - removed large quote

[edit on 3-2-2008 by elevatedone]

Same problem here with the links. Also the UAV would be picked up either my mics around the base or radar. mind you if you feed it live feed back to a sation that wouldn't be too bad you'd at least get some footage until you locked away lol.

Hello to all of you-
Although I am new to this forum, I am definitely not new to the subjects discussed on this system. I've been around this subject since the 60's. I took a quick look at some of the pictures that have been posted here that are supposed to be from Groom and found them to be pretty dated, and to be frank, I am doubtful that they were taken out there. I see prototype development for the Stealth, possibly at Helendale or Palmdale. I see what could be some shots of Tonopah and the runway shots are definitely not from Groom. The runway is too narrow.
Let me bring you up to speed a bit from my perspective. The Golden Triangle of development for prototype planes was Palmdale, Groom and McClellan. The planes were built in Palmdale, tested at Groom and repaired during the night at McClellan, which had the one and only hanger size plane x-ray facilities in the USAF. Just an FYI, large triangle shaped craft were flying out of that base in the early 90's. These were much bigger than the stealth and utterly quiet.
The other place that you folks should get serious about watching is Michael AAF which is on the NW corner of the Dugway facility. There has been a ton of underground construction out there since I discovered in 1996 that more than 50% of Groom's mission had been moved there. Then, of course, McClellan was decommissioned and guess where the work went- Utah (specifically Hill AFB).
I am in total agreement with the information that was online (but not now) that Michael was to be the next military spaceport. The progeny of the X-33 were to be stationed there. Officially I see that the project was cancelled, but I strongly suspect that it went black.
BTW, it has been my experience that it is adviseable to watch the pattern of critter activity, as this is an indication of Black Project stuff. Whether they are there because they are friendlies, or not, you figure it out.

The photo of the Boeing Bird of Prey was taken inside a building at Boeing's Phantom Works facility in St. Louis, Missouri.

The X-20 Dyna-Soar picture is an artist's rendering of the vehicle on approach to Edwards Air Force Base, California.

Neither of these are Groom Lake pictures. The Bird of Prey was tested at Groom Lake, however.

i can't see the images....

Not to kill the mood of the thread or anything, but why is it still topped if it has been a dead thread for almost 3 years? Just wondering.

DTOX X

Hmmm these pictures never really fascinated me, as they are all just pics of jets/planes/base. I want to see something more. So I am going to research tonight to see if I can come up with anything.

Here is a page in German or Dutch im not sure. It has a few cool pictures on it though.