It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pictures from Inside Groom Lake

page: 12
64
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 5 2007 @ 11:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost01

Examin it carefully, and you will see that the shape of the craft that John photographed over Area 51 doesTim






The photo was taken by Gary Shultz. He was at the black mailbox facing west, after sunset. The saucer was departing to the north.




posted on Apr, 5 2007 @ 02:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear
The photo was taken by Gary Shultz. He was at the black mailbox facing west, after sunset. The saucer was departing to the north.


"Facing west, after sunset" would mean that any real craft in the sky would be illuminated from behind (if at all), and should therefore be dark against a possibly still somewhat light sky (depending on how long after sunset the photo was taken).

However, this is not what appears in the photo. The "saucer" is much brighter than the background! How is it illuminated? In fact, the whole "saucer like" look of the alleged object is because of its apparent(!) illumination from the top left, i.e. from a sun in the south.

=> This doesn't add up! Could you please explain these inconsistencies?

Regards
yf


[edit on 5.4.2007 by yfxxx]



posted on Apr, 5 2007 @ 02:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear
The photo was taken by Gary Shultz. He was at the black mailbox facing west, after sunset. The saucer was departing to the north.


The dark blue color of the sky in the photograph would suggest this could have been taken at night. How long after sunset are we talking about 1 1/2 - 2 hours? More?

Respectfully,

Tim



posted on Apr, 5 2007 @ 03:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by yfxxx
This doesn't add up! Could you please explain these inconsistencies?
Regards yf




I can't but I'll ask Gary next time I see him.



posted on Apr, 5 2007 @ 03:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost01
The dark blue color of the sky in the photograph would suggest this could have been taken at night.


No, if you take a picture at night the sky is black, dark black.

If you take a picture after sunset like 30 or 40 minutes the sky on the film is dark blue.



posted on Apr, 5 2007 @ 03:40 PM
link   
True!

I have to admit you are 100% correct, John. The sky is in fact back at night, not blue as I suggested in my last post. I think I confused the point when the sun first disappears behind the horizon, with the later part of sunset. Perhaps Dusk might be a better word than night.

Respectfully,

Tim

[edit on 4/5/2007 by Ghost01]



posted on Apr, 5 2007 @ 03:42 PM
link   
and i though they only make porn movies in area 51

keep up the good work fellas



posted on Apr, 9 2007 @ 06:16 AM
link   
thanks for the pictures mate this is my favourite topic on the boards



posted on Apr, 28 2007 @ 05:12 AM
link   
I studied the pictures and I can say that I don't know if those are from inside area 51, but I would be very interested in knowing how you managed to get hold of such pictures. You can email me at expertpaintballer@yahoo.com. I will look forward to your reply.



posted on Jul, 1 2007 @ 06:56 AM
link   
Those were some pretty good pics ,I've got a feeling those were from area -51, all I'm wondering is who obtained these photos and if it is possible to obtain any photo evidence that S-4 exists 'since I'm a firm believer in John Lear and Bob Lazar.



posted on Jul, 1 2007 @ 08:09 AM
link   
Ive just been browsing A-51 using flashearth.com, try zooming in and it didnt let me, ended up moving the image to the Atlantic Ocean.. freaked me out abit.



posted on Jul, 1 2007 @ 06:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Knights
Ive just been browsing A-51 using flashearth.com, try zooming in and it didnt let me, ended up moving the image to the Atlantic Ocean.


You have to zoom in really slowly using Flashearth, or it will jump on you. I just tried looking at Groom Lake and had no problems. However, the area does have a maximum zoom level. When I tried to go closer, I got a picture of one of thoes circles with a line through it that means forbidden.

Tim



posted on Jul, 26 2007 @ 07:22 AM
link   
iknow this is off topic but what are the main reasons for an area being forbidden to see?



posted on Aug, 28 2007 @ 11:12 AM
link   
hey guys im pretty new to this whole thing. but i have fond fasination wth area 51 and ufo and the likes. the other day i took a notion to look at area 51 through the eyes of maps.google.com a supposed liter version of google. hours of scanning the landscape i came across a few interesting formations located in and around the supposeed area51 base and the nellis air force base grounds. below is a few of the shots i came across they are in jpeg fom:

i228.photobucket.com...

i228.photobucket.com...

i228.photobucket.com...

i228.photobucket.com...

i228.photobucket.com...

i228.photobucket.com...

i228.photobucket.com...

i228.photobucket.com...

i228.photobucket.com...

i228.photobucket.com...

i228.photobucket.com...

i apologise in advance for not getting the cordinates for these snapshots. using google maps doesnt have the same functions as earth. the last few are interesting as its a lone building located far out from any other of the buildings located on the nellis base. also i ahve notice that these strange formation tend to occur in the flatter parts of the canyon in the dry lake areas. is there a reason for this im not sure??


im putting this up because what i have here could be quite frankly a load of crap and could simply be weather formations or natural pheneoma?? you guys be the judge. my reasoning is that it def not weather, the shapes are to perfect in some of the cases, and also resemble shapes of "so called crop circles" coincedence?? hmmmmmm???



posted on Aug, 28 2007 @ 02:21 PM
link   
Most of these photos show bombing and gunnery targets on the Nevada Test and Training Range. These are used during exercises such as Red Flag. Some of the targets include derelict vehicles (trucks, tanks, etc.). You will also find simulated airfields and missile sites.

Without knowing the location of the small building complex, I couldn't tell you what it is for sure. There are many tracking and communications sites throughout the range.

[edit on 30-9-2007 by Shadowhawk]



posted on Sep, 4 2007 @ 04:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by PopeyeFAFL
To Zipdot

What make you think, that the Russian didn't know about the SR-71 at the time ?


Didn't really matter if they knew. They didn't have anything that could catch it, or detect it.



posted on Sep, 25 2007 @ 10:28 PM
link   
Whoa doggie. A good 60 percent of the external images got iced. Must have hit a nerve somewhere. These phonecams must drive blackops berzerker.



posted on Oct, 10 2007 @ 10:30 PM
link   
This is just a pic from google maps

It shows some weird liquid metal looking stuff on the ground outside on the road

Thoughts?




posted on Oct, 13 2007 @ 01:18 PM
link   
It's either water, deicing fluid, or fire suppression foam. Maybe an airplane underwent deicing on the taxiway. Perhaps an airplane caught fire. There do not appear to be any service vehicles of fire trucks nearby and the airplane is no longer on the taxiway.



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 08:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by meshuggah1324
Yeah, the planes coming out now were made in the 70's and 80's. Some of the air craft being developed today won't be seen until around 2035!









TRUE




top topics



 
64
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join