It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jehosephat
one distrubing theory was that it was interduce into the humans by a guy having sex with a gorilla and receiving the virus
who knows anymore
Originally posted by BlackGuardXIII
On a similar track, you might want to check out the details of the Tuskogee Syphillis experiments that are a precedent setting criminal act carried out by the medical community on unsuspecting US citizens. It is proof that not all lives were considered sacred by the government that was supposed to protect them.
Originally posted by blanketgirl
such as the theories of where our cancer epidemic originated?
Originally posted by BlackGuardXIII
...I feel that cancer is just a catch all term for 'death'. Lung death is called lung cancer, skin death - skin cancer, stomach death... you get the idea. It is just a label arbitrarily assigned by us to define the death of a system. It is all just death imho.
And I also think that our poorer diets, with less nutrients, and more fat, sugar, etc. play a role. As do chemicals, additives, preservatives, pesticides, herbicides, etc...Anyway, the doctor's average lifespan is 58 years, and a bus driver's is 75, so I will be asking my bus driver how to live a longer life, for purely statistical reasons.
The scientific party line is that a monkey in Africa with AIDS bit a native on the butt. The native then went to town and gave it to a prostitute who gave it to the local banker who gave it to his wife and three girlfriends and what!
50 to 75 million people became infected with AIDS in Africa and throughout the world. This is an entirely preposterous story, and it is preposterous because:
1. The green velvet monkey of Africa doesn't get human AIDS. You can't reproduce the disease in monkeys even by injecting AIDS virus directly into them.
2. After injecting the virus into monkeys, you can't transmit it to other monkeys, much less to humans.
3. Genetically, AIDS (HIV-1) is not even close to the monkey form of immunodeficiency virus.
[For references on the three items above,
see: Seale, Dr. John J.,
Royal Society of Medicine, Sept. 1987,
Seale, Dr. John J.,
The Origin of AIDS -- International
Conference on AIDS, Cairo, March 1988.]
4. AIDS started not in the villages but in the cities of Africa, where there are no wild monkeys.
5. The doubling time of AIDS infection being about 12 months, one monkey biting one native and then spreading the disease would have taken 20 years to reach a million cases. Seventy-five million Africans became infected practically simultaneously. At the same time, the disease became rampant in the U.S., Haiti and Brazil.
It is obvious that one monkey couldn't have done that (or one homosexual, either). There had to be some sort of simultaneous seeding process.
The only worldwide simultaneous seeding going on at the same time was the smallpox vaccine program of the World Health Organization (the WHO).
The early epidemiology of the AIDS pandemic fits the smallpox vaccination project of the WHO -- AND NOTHING ELSE -- with the exception of the U.S., which we will examine subsequently.)
The AIDS virus was created in a laboratory by combining lethal animal "retroviruses" in human cancer (HeLA) cell cultures. These viruses have never before caused infection in man.
The "species barrier" has always been nature's way of keeping a deadly virus from wiping out the entire animal kingdom, including man. ...
The virologists deny that the AIDS virus, HIV-1, is of animal origin. I am sure that you see the paradox here. Aren't monkeys animals?
They are also united in saying that it's not possible for the virus to have been engineered in a laboratory. If it didn't come from other animals and it didn't come from a laboratory, and they now admit privately that the monkey couldn't have done it, then it must have come out of thin air. That's a theological position and hence beyond argument. It's certainly not scientific.
AIDS was not the first germ warfare attack against Americans.
In the early '60s, millions of unsuspecting Americans took either Salk injected polio vaccine or the live Sabin polio vaccine, which was taken by mouth.
BOTH WERE LACED WITH S.V.-40, A CANCER-CAUSING MONKEY VIRUS.14
With an incubation period of 20 years, we are only now seeing the grim results of this bio-attack against Americans, largely in the form of brain tumors and leukemia.
Salk didn't like the Sabin vaccine and Sabin didn't like the Salk vaccine. I think they are both right. It is interesting to note that polio was rapidly disappearing WITHOUT a vaccine (J. Trop. Pediat, env. Child. Health 21, 11) ....
Originally posted by Tinkleflower
Original lots of the polio vaccine have been tested for the presence of HIV using certain tests that were not available 1950s... no HIV was present in any of those lots.
In addition (and perhaps more importantly), HIV has been found in the frozen samples of people infected before the polio vaccines were created.