It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
Originally posted by Rasputin13
I'm getting fed up with all the sissy liberals who are always afraid of confronting evil where evil exists. "Don't be mean to Kim Jong Ill, he might do something bad!" Gimme a break, would yas?
Rasputin, are you signed up in the US or NK military?
Even if Rasputin isn't in the the U.S. military, there are plenty of others like my son who voluntarily signed up to guarantee your right to think and say whatever you want - even if it doesn't make much sense.
[edit on 6/3/2005 by centurion1211]
Originally posted by Hajduk
Originally posted by titian
The war never ended, technically.
Was the Korean "War" actually even a declared war to begin with, or was it just an intervention like Vietnam?
Originally posted by The Vagabond
How much longer can the US continue to provoke North Korea before Kim Jung Il decides to commit his country to a nuclear exchange with the US?
For however long it takes the Koreans to engineer a nuke small enough to fit on their missiles, only 5 of which can even reach the United States according to estimates at GlobalSecurity.org.
Besides that, there is really not rhyme or reason to a first strike. The most certain way for the little dictator to get nuked is to launch one first, and how could he fail to know this? The Alpha and Omega of North Korean security has to be developing and protecting their deterrent so that it can deter us. If you launch your deterrent you lose it.
[originally posted by lightseeker]I don't know about others but as for myself, this is scary stuff! I resent both the powers that be in Washington and the crazy leaders of N Korea playing nuclear one-ups-manship with the stakes being the possible destruction of the civilized world.
If it makes you feel any better, the stakes are mainly Japan and the Koreas. It would still be quite possibly the largest single loss of life in human history, so it probably shouldn't make you feel any better. At the end of the day though, Kim is making the Cuban Missile Crisis mistake. He is on the brink of starting a war with us in his attempt to keep us from doing something we never intended to do anyway. In my humble opinion, the primary fault for this situation rests with him.
I agree for the most part with this, however, I don't trust Kim to have the sense to back down the way Khruschev did with Cuba, although I pray he will.
Originally posted by blueknight
Iran is just as dangerous as North Korea (if not more).
Originally posted by blueknight
Anyone who keeps up on world politics and current events should be aware, regardless of their politics, that we are at a breaking point.
Originally posted by blueknight
Iran and North Korea both harbor terrorists,
Originally posted by blueknight
promote the development of offensive nuclear weapons,
Originally posted by blueknight
hate America
Originally posted by blueknight
and western Europe
Originally posted by blueknight
and openly challenge anyone and everyone on a daily basis.
Originally posted by blueknight
The comparison could be made to an inner-city gang member looking to kill someone important just to gain notoriety.
Originally posted by blueknight
We are stuck with a catch 22: If we placate them and bow to their demands, terrorists will soon be controlling the lives of everyone through the fear factor.
Originally posted by blueknight
If we take them on, it will NOT be like Iraq. Both Russia and China have openly admitted that they supply Iran and North Korea with weapons and computer technology.
Originally posted by blueknight
They have also openly expressed their intentions to back those countries, should we confront them.
Originally posted by blueknight
Regardless of where you live or whether you give hugs or slugs, I see no way out of this without serious bloodshed on both sides. I pray I am wrong, but the facts are there.
Originally posted by subz
Originally posted by blueknight
We are stuck with a catch 22: If we placate them and bow to their demands, terrorists will soon be controlling the lives of everyone through the fear factor.
I'll take my chances with the terrorists thanks. Seems we've already given control of our lives and liberty over to our politicians for the very same fear factor. Atleast I know where I stand with a terrorist.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
There's also the fact that their 'demands' are simply to be left alone to exercize their sovereign rights. They're not on our doorstep threatening aggression, we're on their doorstep threatening aggression.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
Terrorists? The only foreign terrorist attack on our soil was committed by 19 Saudi Arabian members of al Queda, led by a Saudi Arabian called Osama bin Laden. Why aren't we on their doorstep? Will attacking Iran and North Korea in addition to Afghanistan and Iraq, stop those Saudi Arabians from terrorising us?
Originally posted by djohnsto77
subz, withdrawing from the NPT is a totally different situation than from the ABM Treaty. With the ABM the U.S. and U.S.S.R. simply promised to not develop a technology, but with the NPT non-nuclear signatory states get nuclear technology for peaceful purposes from the nuclear states. If they then withdraw and use that gained technology to develop weapons, its still a breach of the treaty and actionable by the UN Security Council.
Each Party shall in exercising its national sovereignty have the right to withdraw from the Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other Parties to the Treaty and to the United Nations Security Council three months in advance. Such notice shall include a statement of the extraordinary events it regards as having jeopardized its supreme interests.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
You seem to be ignoring the facts...India, Pakistan and Israel never signed the NPT and never received any nuclear technology from the U.S., Britain, Russia, France or China. Iran and North Korea were signatories and did receive such technology. The Treaty requires for withdrawal that the UNSC get involved, it's not an arcane reading, it's in the plain text:
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Obviously the UNSC needs to go over the reasons why the country wants to withdraw and determine if it will use any nuclear technology gained by the treaty for weapons use and the country could face consequences from the Council.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Besides, why shouldn't the US move super fighters to the border of an enemy that its at war with and who is threatening to use nukes against it??