AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Ancient & Lost Civilizations discussion forum.  (rss)


Out Of Place Artifacts


<<  4    5    6    7  >>



reply posted on 31-10-2008 @ 03:00 AM by Valkyr8


Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by jonSUN
The Smithsonian institute & many museums have been known to cover up or hide unexplained artifacts that have been found.

This is absolutely untrue.


Actually, you are wrong. It is a known fact that the Smithsonian has not only covered up history but has intentionally destroyed artifacts that contradicts popularly accepted history. This is a dig that the Smithsonian actually did itself and denies it totally because it disrupts popularly accepted history.

www.surfingtheapocalypse.com...

Why not try it yourself? Get a copy of THE PHOENIX GAZETTE April 5th, 1909 front page and call up the Smithsonian. Ask about this article and see what they tell you. They will deny the whole thing.

[edit on 31-10-2008 by Valkyr8]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 31-10-2008 @ 02:04 PM by Anonymous ATS


reply to post by Valkyr8



That's right. It's just another in a long line of goverment conspiracies, right up to the white house. After all, we know almost nothing of what really went on during the administration of President Thomas E. Dewey. And what isn't NASA telling us about the Lunar Bat People? These coverups have to end!

I would however like to engage in a thought experiment for a moment if I may, out of idle curiousity. Lets say, purely for the sake of argument, that the article in question was false. I know, it's a stretch to even imagine it but bear with me. If, just hypothetically, it should transpire that the events described never happened, if one were to still contact the Smithsonian about it, what do you suppose their reaction would be?

-Oniomancer



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 31-10-2008 @ 04:25 PM by Harte


Originally posted by Valkyr8
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by jonSUN
The Smithsonian institute & many museums have been known to cover up or hide unexplained artifacts that have been found.

This is absolutely untrue.


Actually, you are wrong. It is a known fact that the Smithsonian has not only covered up history but has intentionally destroyed artifacts that contradicts popularly accepted history. This is a dig that the Smithsonian actually did itself and denies it totally because it disrupts popularly accepted history.

www.surfingtheapocalypse.com...

Why not try it yourself? Get a copy of THE PHOENIX GAZETTE April 5th, 1909 front page and call up the Smithsonian. Ask about this article and see what they tell you. They will deny the whole thing.

[edit on 31-10-2008 by Valkyr8]


Take a peek around ATS and you'll find that one of the supposed participants in this find never actually existed.

Note that the Gazette's article mentions it is a follow-up of a story covered in a previous issue.

Now note the date (month and day) on the article.

Do you suppose that pioneers in Arizona never pulled each other's legs?


Originally posted by Anonymous ATS

That's right. It's just another in a long line of goverment conspiracies, right up to the white house. After all, we know almost nothing of what really went on during the administration of President Thomas E. Dewey. And what isn't NASA telling us about the Lunar Bat People? These coverups have to end!


Coverup? What coverup?

We've all been long informed that Bat Boy has joined the marines and is today fight'n them turrists over in Eyerack!

Originally posted by Anonymous ATSI would however like to engage in a thought experiment for a moment if I may, out of idle curiousity. Lets say, purely for the sake of argument, that the article in question was false. I know, it's a stretch to even imagine it but bear with me. If, just hypothetically, it should transpire that the events described never happened, if one were to still contact the Smithsonian about it, what do you suppose their reaction would be?

Hmmm...

How about:
"We can answer this question, but please don't ask about the Ark of the Covenant again."


Onio,
What is the advantage to posting under "anonymous" and then signing you're username?

Harte



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-11-2008 @ 09:58 PM by Anonymous ATS


I just found a new website with a tremendous amount of unique research materials I haven't seen before on out-of-place artifacts and other ancient mysteries. It goes into a lot deeper studies on many of the same type of artifacts your site covers, plus a listing of at least 150 geologic anomalies, some of which date back an incredible 4 billion years or more. Check it out at:

www.forgottenagesresearch.com



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 01:43 AM by Hanslune


reply to post by Anonymous ATS



The information on that site is for sale and not freely available.

Mods this might be a sales attempt



   copyright & usage 


<<  4    5    6    7  >>

















































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.010 seconds
Page processed in 0.073 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.