Out Of Place Artifacts, page 7

privacy

Pages: << 4 5 6 7 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times

reply posted on 31-10-2008 @ 03:00 AM by Valkyr8

Originally posted by Nygdan

Originally posted by jonSUN
The Smithsonian institute & many museums have been known to cover up or hide unexplained artifacts that have been found.

This is absolutely untrue.

Actually, you are wrong. It is a known fact that the Smithsonian has not only covered up history but has intentionally destroyed artifacts that contradicts popularly accepted history. This is a dig that the Smithsonian actually did itself and denies it totally because it disrupts popularly accepted history.

www.surfingtheapocalypse.com...

Why not try it yourself? Get a copy of THE PHOENIX GAZETTE April 5th, 1909 front page and call up the Smithsonian. Ask about this article and see what they tell you. They will deny the whole thing.

[edit on 31-10-2008 by Valkyr8]

reply posted on 31-10-2008 @ 02:04 PM by Anonymous ATS

reply to post by Valkyr8

That's right. It's just another in a long line of goverment conspiracies, right up to the white house. After all, we know almost nothing of what really went on during the administration of President Thomas E. Dewey. And what isn't NASA telling us about the Lunar Bat People? These coverups have to end!

I would however like to engage in a thought experiment for a moment if I may, out of idle curiousity. Lets say, purely for the sake of argument, that the article in question was false. I know, it's a stretch to even imagine it but bear with me. If, just hypothetically, it should transpire that the events described never happened, if one were to still contact the Smithsonian about it, what do you suppose their reaction would be?

-Oniomancer

reply posted on 31-10-2008 @ 04:25 PM by Harte

Originally posted by Valkyr8

Originally posted by Nygdan

Originally posted by jonSUN
The Smithsonian institute & many museums have been known to cover up or hide unexplained artifacts that have been found.

This is absolutely untrue.

Actually, you are wrong. It is a known fact that the Smithsonian has not only covered up history but has intentionally destroyed artifacts that contradicts popularly accepted history. This is a dig that the Smithsonian actually did itself and denies it totally because it disrupts popularly accepted history.

www.surfingtheapocalypse.com...

Why not try it yourself? Get a copy of THE PHOENIX GAZETTE April 5th, 1909 front page and call up the Smithsonian. Ask about this article and see what they tell you. They will deny the whole thing.

[edit on 31-10-2008 by Valkyr8]

Take a peek around ATS and you'll find that one of the supposed participants in this find never actually existed.

Note that the Gazette's article mentions it is a follow-up of a story covered in a previous issue.

Now note the date (month and day) on the article.

Do you suppose that pioneers in Arizona never pulled each other's legs?

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS

That's right. It's just another in a long line of goverment conspiracies, right up to the white house. After all, we know almost nothing of what really went on during the administration of President Thomas E. Dewey. And what isn't NASA telling us about the Lunar Bat People? These coverups have to end!

Coverup? What coverup?

We've all been long informed that Bat Boy has joined the marines and is today fight'n them turrists over in Eyerack!

Originally posted by Anonymous ATSI would however like to engage in a thought experiment for a moment if I may, out of idle curiousity. Lets say, purely for the sake of argument, that the article in question was false. I know, it's a stretch to even imagine it but bear with me. If, just hypothetically, it should transpire that the events described never happened, if one were to still contact the Smithsonian about it, what do you suppose their reaction would be?

Hmmm...

How about: