I'm sorry.
I've tried really hard, to find a logical or even quasi-logical pattern involving these dates, and I keep coming up with blanks.
Though this is probably outwith the realm of this particular thread, here's my prediction.
June 6th, 2006 will come and go, without any major upset.
June 6th, 2066 will come and go, without any major upset.
June 6th, 2166 will also come and go - ditto.
I'm yet to find any datecentric (if that's even a word) predictions which have taken into account the wee fact that during certain periods,
different countries altered their calenders in different ways, to account for the jump from Julian to Gregorian counting. The interesting factoid in
this entire mess is that they weren't terribly consistent. Some countries made changes involving the same gap - but not all....
Hungary: 21 Oct 1587 was followed by 1 Nov 1587 = 10 days
Italy: 4 Oct 1582 was followed by 15 Oct 1582 = 11 days
Greece: 9 Mar 1924 was followed by 23 Mar 1924 = 14 days
Great Britain and Dominions (including what is now the USA):
2 Sep 1752 was followed by 14 Sep 1752 = 12 days
Now - as we can see, different areas made up for the change in calenders using different years, and in some cases, used different gaps.
Also note that countries who delayed the change-over beyond 1700 AD had to add eleven days as they had inserted an extra leap year; in addition, not
every country even started their new year on January 1st. Confusion abounds, no? Absolutely. If you think this is confusing now, imagine what a
pain in the derriere it must've been back then.
What does this mean? Well, realistically, probably nothing at all. Except that where predictions and numerology are concerned, there are vastly
different gaps, spaces and jumps depending upon where in the world you were located....this means there's an awful lot of space for
interpretation.
An awful lot of space.
So, who are we to believe?
There's entirely too much leeway for "oh, well, this date has come and gone...BUT!!! If we follow
this particular method, or the method
used in this geographical location at this particular time, then the date hasn't yet arrived anyway, or could change...so it could all still
happen!".
I'm a simple girl. I like my predictions to be pretty straightforward - if you can't be exact, you're not going to be impressing many people (if
only because we can
all sit here and say "if we account for three hundred other possible influences should the original scenario fail, then X,
Y and Z will probably happen at
some point")
And that's about it.
We can use numbers to prove, suggest, hint at and disprove just about anything if we put our minds to it. We can find links between a million random
events, and disprove them all as random in the next sentence.
Because it seems we're far too busy trying to find links where none really exist at all.
If you got this far at all - then thankyou for reading. I'm not sure of the coherence myself, so bless you for even trying to follow my
ramblings.
You get the gist though.